search for: depesz

...to run multiple ssh-agents, and load each key to only one of them, and then, before connecting, pick which agent to choose. But this is pretty tedious, and error-prone. Is there any ready solution that could be used, or perhaps a work on incorporating key-filtering to ssh itself? Best regards, depesz -- The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it. http://depesz.com/

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:41:51PM -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 01/22/2014 09:44 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > > Is the solution to it addition of 5 separate "networks" in libvirt, and > > then connecting each guest to its own "network"? > > Yes, that's it. Right now I suggest you create 5 separate "isolated" > networks if you wan...

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 01:31:46AM +0200, ?ngel Gonz?lez wrote: > On 16/10/15 12:46, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 04:15:03PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >>> if the intermediary machine (the "jumphost") is jumphost.example, and > >>> you are trying to reach bar.example.com (which is behind the firewall), > >&gt...

...different guests, but they shouldn't be able to communicate with each other. Is the solution to it addition of 5 separate "networks" in libvirt, and then connecting each guest to its own "network"? Looks sensible, but perhaps I'm overlooking something. Best regards, depesz -- The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it. http://depesz.com/

...pplied when I just: ssh a.bb.cc Is there any way to make ssh apply rules both based on name and based on ip? I could, of course, add special rule for each hostname, but that would mean that my ~/.ssh/config will be huge, and constantly change (new hosts added, old hosts removed). Best regards, depesz -- The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it. http://depesz.com/

...th confirmation prompt required (ssh-add -c) > so that your local machine is still in control of when the different > keys get used. Yeah, but that will (from what I understand from man) re-ask for my password, which is highly impractical given the above passphrase situation. Best regards, depesz

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:02:58PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:34 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski > <depesz at depesz.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm in a situation where I'm using multiple SSH keys, each to connect to > > different set of servers. > > > > I can't load/unload keys on demand, as I usually am connected to at &gt...

On 01/16/2014 05:10 PM, Ján Tomko wrote: > On 01/16/2014 04:51 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > > What is the address reported by 'netstat -tnp'? Oops, 'nestat -tlnp'. > > Jan >

..., but at least I can change it). But whatever I do - I can't make it to listen on 0.0.0.0. I know I can use ssh port forwarding to get to this VNC, but I would very much prefer to be able to set VNC listen to 0.0.0.0 for at least some of my test domains. What am I doing wrong? Best regards, depesz -- The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it. http://depesz.com/

On 01/23/2014 02:45 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:41:51PM -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote: >> On 01/22/2014 09:44 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: >>> Is the solution to it addition of 5 separate "networks" in libvirt, and >>> then connecting each guest to its own...

On 01/16/2014 04:51 PM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > Hi, > First of all, I hope it's not a big problem - I'm running on Debian, not > Redhat. > > To my problem: I'm starting to learn virtualization, libvirt, and > decided to create some test machine. I did it with: > virt-install --name debian-te...

On 01/22/2014 09:44 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > Is the solution to it addition of 5 separate "networks" in libvirt, and > then connecting each guest to its own "network"? Yes, that's it. Right now I suggest you create 5 separate "isolated" networks if you want true isolation. If you...

...have a better write throughput. I would like to perform this change "live" without stopping access to this lv. I have found two interesting examples: http://community.hpe.com/t5/System-Administration/Need-to-move-the-data-from-Linear-LV-to-stripped-LV-on-RHEL-5-7/td-p/6134323 http://www.depesz.com/2015/10/08/converting-logical-volume-so-that-its-striped/ Both say basically to: - change the lv to a mirrored one by adding a stripped copy (~second device in RAID1) - change it back to a non-mirrored one by removing the primary linear lv (~first, source device in RAID1) My os is: $ cat /etc/...