Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "dependencebuild".
Did you mean:
dependencebuilder
2016 Mar 24
3
Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM
...ion/ScopInfo construction logic from the pass logic, such that we
> can run the logic ScopDetection and ScopInfo construction in a function
> pass, call graph scc pass, or even a loop pass.
Totally agreed. Some kind of ScopBuilder interface that can be queried
would be perfect. Additionally a DependenceBuilder.
I would imagine something along the lines of:
Passes: ScopInfo <-----------[depends]----------- DependenceInfo
| |
[queries] [queries]
|...
2016 Mar 25
0
Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM
...logic from the pass logic, such that
> we
> > can run the logic ScopDetection and ScopInfo construction in a function
> > pass, call graph scc pass, or even a loop pass.
> Totally agreed. Some kind of ScopBuilder interface that can be queried
> would be perfect. Additionally a DependenceBuilder.
>
> I would imagine something along the lines of:
>
>
> Passes: ScopInfo <-----------[depends]----------- DependenceInfo
> | |
> [queries] [queries]
>...
2016 Mar 25
1
Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM
...logic, such
>> that we
>> > can run the logic ScopDetection and ScopInfo construction in a function
>> > pass, call graph scc pass, or even a loop pass.
>> Totally agreed. Some kind of ScopBuilder interface that can be queried
>> would be perfect. Additionally a DependenceBuilder.
>>
>> I would imagine something along the lines of:
>>
>>
>> Passes: ScopInfo <-----------[depends]----------- DependenceInfo
>> | |
>> [queries]...
2016 Mar 23
0
Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM
Hi Johannes,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Johannes Doerfert <
doerfert at cs.uni-saarland.de> wrote:
> Hey Utpal,
>
> First of, I think you made nice process here and have some very good
> ideas of what we could do in the future.
>
> [NOTE: I CC'ed some people that have shown interest in this topic but I
> might have forgotten some, therefor I also added the
2016 Mar 21
3
Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM
Hey Utpal,
First of, I think you made nice process here and have some very good
ideas of what we could do in the future.
[NOTE: I CC'ed some people that have shown interest in this topic but I
might have forgotten some, therefor I also added the llvm-dev list.]
For the upcoming GSoC proposal we should slow down a little bit and
reevaluate our goals. After talking to a couple of LLVM and