search for: dependec

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "dependec".

Did you mean: depended
2017 Jun 22
2
A bug in DependenceAnalysis?
...%11* * store i32 %10, i32* %12, align 4* * br label %13* *; <label>:13: ; preds = %7* * %14 = add i32 %.0, 1* * br label %4* *; <label>:15: ; preds = %4* * ret void* *}* Can you please check whether the anti dependeces that you get are loop-carried or loop-independent? Thanks, - Stan On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stan, > > can you share your example.bc? Can you reproduce your issue with llvm 4.0 > or, better even, trunk? > > C...
2016 Mar 29
0
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
...Memory > space on the device does not belong to any stream, so any stream can access > it. The thing that does belong to the stream is the "task" of copying the > data from one place to another (or other tasks such as running a kernel). > Do you plan to introduce a cross-task dependece, as it is done in other models? Say, you started data copy in one stream and want to start two computation tasks dependent on these data in parallel. Can you assign these tasks on different streams? How can you ensure the data is copied before tasks are started? > Yes, I think the in-memory m...
2004 Oct 12
2
tclk, tcltk
I have been having problems with these two 'libraries' since I installed 2.0.0. I have built a package with couple of functions so that I can load it at startup every time R is booted. The problem is that I have the following error every time I call the library Loading required package: tclk Error: package 'tclk' could not be loaded In addition: Warning message: There is no
2017 Jun 21
2
A bug in DependenceAnalysis?
Hi Philip, Thanks for checking! I'm running my own Foo pass that registers DependenceAnalysisWrapperPass as a prerequisite and then I run it like so: opt -load libfoo.so -foo example.bc This is LLVM 3.9. Cheers, - Stan On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stan, > > in both cases I get a consistent anti result. Can you
2016 Mar 28
2
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries
Hi Sergos, Am I got it right, that SE interfaces are bound to the stream that is passed as argument? As I can see the stream is an abstraction of the target - hence data transfers for particular stream is limited to this stream? As for libomptarget implementation the data once offloaded can be reused in all offload entries, without additional data transfer. Is it possible in SE approach? If I
2012 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] Target Dependent Hexagon Packetizer patch
...nstruction(MachineInstr *MI); >> + >> + // isLegalToPacketizeTogether - Is it legal to packetize SUI and SUJ >> + // together. >> + bool isLegalToPacketizeTogether(SUnit *SUI, SUnit *SUJ); >> + >> + // isLegalToPruneDependencies - Is it legal to prune dependece between SUI >> + // and SUJ. >> + bool isLegalToPruneDependencies(SUnit *SUI, SUnit *SUJ); >> + >> + MachineBasicBlock::iterator addToPacket(MachineInstr *MI); >> + private: >> + bool IsCallDependent(MachineInstr* MI, SDep::Kind DepType, unsigned De...