search for: depedning

Hi how do i set an SIP users to make outgoing calls that is worth only $5. if they exceed $5 they can't make any calls. what i need is not a calling card, but to limit outgoing calls for SIP users depedning on a value i give. I use realtime asterisk. Thank You Kanishka -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050227/73c38e9c/attachment.htm

Hello folks, I had an ext3 filesystem mounted as the root of a Linux MOO server. Unfortunately, the filesystem was on one of the infamous DTLA-3070xx drives - and the drive decided to fail at the worst moment it possibly could, trashing the filesystem fairly well. The situation is as follows: I used dd_rescue to create an image of what is left of the filesystem, but I ended up with some 65MB

...ULL' to omit lower bars. ## ui: upper end of error bars. Defaults to 'y + uiw' or 'x + uiw' ## depeding on 'err'. Set to 'NULL' omit upper bars. ## li: lower end of error bars. Defaults to 'y - liw' or 'x - liw' ## depedning on 'err'. Set to 'NULL' to omit lower bars. Best Volker

On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was

On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>

On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: >>>>>

On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster

On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca>: > > I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking > > if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the > > same issue as I describe below? > > > >

On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer <lists at

On 8 March 2016 at 19:13, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > > > >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On

Hi Sjoerd, On 09/20, Sjoerd Meijer wrote: > I have not been following the polyhedral developments in both GCC and > LLVM very closely the last few years, but I was just wondering if > there are any lessons learned we should look at (or actually already > aware of) in GCC's implementation and integration of Graphite. For > example, do we know if it is (still) enabled/used/etc.?

> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >> Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others, >> >>> On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>>

On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: > Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others, > >> On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> ** >> >> *Hi everyone,As you may know, stock LLVM does not provide the kind of >> advanced loop transformations

** *Hi everyone,As you may know, stock LLVM does not provide the kind of advanced loop transformations necessary to provide good performance on many applications. LLVM's Polly project provides many of the required capabilities, including loop transformations such as fission, fusion, skewing, blocking/tiling, and interchange, all powered by state-of-the-art dependence analysis. Polly also