search for: deop

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "deop".

Did you mean: deep
2011 Aug 02
3
MySQL package to install on CentOS/RedHad 6.x
I can see Oracle has packages for RedHad 5 but not for 6... Should I install the rpm for redhad even though they are built against 5? Or should I install the generic rpm package from Oracle? anyone knows the differences? Thanks in advance Regards, Marc Deop
2020 Aug 25
1
[PATCH v4 4/4] vhost: add an RPMsg API
...the virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > > > driver, and that one has specific VirtIO queue and message usage patterns. > > > > That could be fine for legacy virtio, but now you are claiming support > > for virtio 1, so need to fix these assumptions in the device. > > I can just deop these checks without changing anything else, that still would work. > I could also make this work with "any" layout - either ignoring any left-over > buffers or maybe even getting them one by one. But I wouldn't even be able to test > those modes without modifying / breaki...
2020 Aug 10
2
[PATCH v4 4/4] vhost: add an RPMsg API
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:27:08AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and >
2020 Aug 10
2
[PATCH v4 4/4] vhost: add an RPMsg API
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:19:17PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:27:08AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and >
2020 Aug 12
0
[PATCH v4 4/4] vhost: add an RPMsg API
...entation, and it has to match the virtio_rpmsg_bus.c > > driver, and that one has specific VirtIO queue and message usage patterns. > > That could be fine for legacy virtio, but now you are claiming support > for virtio 1, so need to fix these assumptions in the device. I can just deop these checks without changing anything else, that still would work. I could also make this work with "any" layout - either ignoring any left-over buffers or maybe even getting them one by one. But I wouldn't even be able to test those modes without modifying / breaking the current...