search for: deny_do

...o change the filelocking-status of an opened file from EXCLUSIVE+BATCH to another status ? We have to open an file to write at the same time from different pc's into this file. For example the following smbstatus -u USER output: Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock Name DENY_DOS 0x1 RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH kund.dat But we have to change it from RDOnly to RW and the OPLOCK to anything else but EXCLUSIVE+BATCH. So what do we have to do ? Thanxxx for your help! -- SET THE CONTROLS FOR THE HEART OF THE SUN Jens

...started happening, but we first noticed it about 3 months ago. We have two seperate Samba servers, both having the same problem when using swat. Both are running 3.0.21a. When clicking on Status after logging into to swat, the Open Files section isn't displaying properly. Each process says DENY_DOS under Sharing, and under File, each process says A[] (The letter A and then a square). Does anybody have any idea what happend and how I can fix this? Thanks.

...pid machine Connected at ------------------------------------------------------- BigDeb_Ghs 1208 stu07-53 Thu Jan 29 00:22:32 2004 Locked files: Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock Name -------------------------------------------------------------- 1208 DENY_DOS 0x1 RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /holding/ghostbackups/dell28Jan04.gho Thu Jan 29 00:22:40 2004 Samba version 3.0.0-Debian PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1251 drratliff drra...

I have an intermittent problem with dangling MS Access DB lock files. In a productive environment with N batch queus (each on a separate Windows XP Professional) a scheduler PC dispatches the work load to a free queue by means of modifying a simple MS Access DB file called "PRIM.mdb", which resides on a Samba 3.0.20 share. Each free queue PC polls the same MS Access DB file every 60

Hi folks, I am experiencing a strange problem with 1.9.18p7 on FreeBSD 2.2.2. When I access files from the [homes] share, my Win95 client seems to be caching the files, and not realising that the files may have changed. For example, I can load a simple text file (from the [homes] share) into Codewright on the Win95 client. Then I edit the same file using vi on the samba server, and write out

...share_mode)) { + DEBUG(3, ("check_file_sharing: allowing delete\n")); continue; + } /* * Someone else has a share lock on it, check to see * if we can too. */ - if ((GET_DENY_MODE(share_entry->share_mode) != DENY_DOS) || - (share_entry->pid != pid)) + if ((GET_DENY_MODE(share_entry->share_mode) != DENY_DOS) || + (share_entry->pid != pid)) { + DEBUG(3, ("check_file_sharing: bailing early\n")); goto free_and_exit; - + } } /* end for */...

...ee Linux has got a faster processor than NT. Then why does it take longer using samba ? Is it a linux problem ? The shares on both the Operating system is read only and hence there is no problem of file locking. We have put locking = no in smb.conf. We checked smbstatus and found DenyMode to be DENY_DOS for the files accessed. Can anyone tell us what's going wrong ?

...path = /tivoli/staging guest ok = Yes default case = upper Also, where can I get info on the particular modes listed under "Sharing" in the SWAT status page? I'd like to know why I'm getting both "DENY_WRITE" (which is what I want) and "DENY_DOS" (no idea why).

Hi, I have an SMB server running RH6.2 with SMB 2.0.7. All the clients are WIN95, and require access to a database on the SAMBA server. The problem is that the database locks the file while the user is modifying it, and then unlocks it when the user returns to the programs menu. If the user then selects another action that uses the same file the program reports that the file is locked. Another

...avoid others from not beeing able to start the batch file and other files that are needed for the whole app. But since this was not sufficient for the multiusage of the application we had to go as far as defining 'share modes = no', thus the share modes that are disabled by this option are DENY_DOS, DENY_ALL, DENY_READ, DENY_WRITE, DENY_NONE and DENY_FCB. That made the application usable in a multi-user environment. But major downside of this is that for just this application the WHOLE SHARE is now in the unwanted modus of having no locking whatsoever going on.... The next problem now...

I saw a little discussion about this a few weeks ago but nothing concrete. We're running samba-1.9.18p8 under Solaris 2.6x86. I am periodically getting the following in the logfiles, usually _many_ at a time: 1998/11/03 14:42:00 request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 5411 on port 40884 for dev = 1980040, inode = 33c4d When I look up the PID (in this case

...ng is the "deny modes". These are set by an application when it opens a file to determine what types of access should be allowed simultaneously with its open. A client may ask for DENY_NONE, DENY_READ, DENY_WRITE or DENY_ALL. There are also special compatability modes called DENY_FCB and DENY_DOS. You can disable share modes using "share modes = no". This may be useful on a heavily loaded server as the share modes code is very slow. See also the FAST_SHARE_MODES option in the Makefile for a way to do full share modes very fast using shared memory (if your OS supports it). MAP...

....c: oplock_break(1050) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file TF4WIN/TF4WIN.EXE. and smbstatus returns Locked Files: Pid DenyMode R/W Oplock Name ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10476 DENY_NONE RDWR NONE /home/TF4WIN/TF4WIN/TFDATAFL.LDB 10476 DENY_DOS RDONLY NONE /home/TF4WIN/TF4WIN/TF4WIN.EXE 10476 DENY_NONE RDWR NONE /home/TF4WIN/TF4WIN/TFDATAFL.MDB 10476 DENY_DOS RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /home/TF4WIN/TF4WIN/IDFILE.DAT i can't figure out any sort of pattern. i can run it on one client and have it work, then exit and restart the program an...

...a few days back, except that I could not modify ACLs. I could see the current permissions, even add a user or group to the list, but at the very last "OK" button I received an "Access Denied" error (perhaps to do with locking? smbstatus showed the file in question locked as DENY_DOS, RDONLY, Oplock=NONE). Anyway, this latest CVS version plain crashes. I had a brief peek at the code, but I don't understand the -4096?! [2001/06/30 09:11:38, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(205) eelco closed file Backup of questionnaire_marketsurvey.wbk (numopen=0) [2001/06/30 09:11:3...