Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "denormal_numb".
Did you mean:
denormal_number
2014 Aug 01
3
Fix and question apodization functions
Hi,
I was doing some speed and compression comparisons with various
apodization/windowing functions, and found out that the
definitions for the bartlett and bartlett_hann window in the
FLAC codebase have been wrong since their introduction. The
attached patch fixes that.
Furthermore, I found some peculiar behaviour of the gauss
apodization that seems to expose bug. Using different windows
2014 Aug 02
0
Fix and question apodization functions
...the
> case when using FLAC 1.3.0.
>
> I used gprof to check and it seems that the time spend in the
> function FLAC__lpc_compute_autocorrelation_intrin_sse_lag_16
> increases 20-fold while the number of calls stays the same.
> Could this be a bug?
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denormal_number#Performance_issues> ?
Try something like this:
void FLAC__window_gauss(FLAC__real *window, const FLAC__int32 L, const FLAC__real stddev)
{
static const double anti_denormal = 0.88817841970012523233890533447266e-15; /* 2e-50 */
const FLAC__int32 N = L - 1;
const double N2 = (double)N / 2.;...
2019 Nov 19
2
Why is matrix product slower when matrix has very small values?
Hi,
I experience surprisingly large timing differences for the
multiplication of matrices of the same dimension. An example is given
below. How can this be explained?
I posted the question on Stackoverflow:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58886111/r-why-is-matrix-product-slower-when-matrix-has-very-small-values
Somebody could reproduce the behavior but I did not get any useful
explanations