search for: denable_polly

...y as a build dependency: are > you envisioning this to be tied into LLVM to the point where we can't > build LLVM without Polly? > I thought the approach would rather be that a default build of LLVM > would have Polly available but that there will "forever" be a > `-DENABLE_POLLY=OFF` option? > This seems like an important distinction to me, as making it more > integrated but still optional for the correct behavior of LLVM means > that people can continue to work and maintain "forever" an > optimization pipeline which operates without Polly, while s...

...Polly as a build dependency: are you > envisioning this to be tied into LLVM to the point where we can't build > LLVM without Polly? > I thought the approach would rather be that a default build of LLVM would > have Polly available but that there will "forever" be a > `-DENABLE_POLLY=OFF` option? > This seems like an important distinction to me, as making it more > integrated but still optional for the correct behavior of LLVM means that > people can continue to work and maintain "forever" an optimization pipeline > which operates without Polly, while star...

...are you envisioning this to be tied into LLVM to the point where >> we can't build LLVM without Polly? >> I thought the approach would rather be that a default build of >> LLVM would have Polly available but that there will "forever" be >> a `-DENABLE_POLLY=OFF` option? >> This seems like an important distinction to me, as making it more >> integrated but still optional for the correct behavior of LLVM >> means that people can continue to work and maintain "forever" an >> optimization pipeline which op...

...rite that we should take Polly as a build dependency: are you envisioning this to be tied into LLVM to the point where we can't build LLVM without Polly? I thought the approach would rather be that a default build of LLVM would have Polly available but that there will "forever" be a `-DENABLE_POLLY=OFF` option? This seems like an important distinction to me, as making it more integrated but still optional for the correct behavior of LLVM means that people can continue to work and maintain "forever" an optimization pipeline which operates without Polly, while starting to get more int...

On 09/12/2017 10:26 PM, Gerolf Hoflehner wrote: > > >> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >> On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >>> Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others, >>> *...* >>> >>> One thing that I’d