search for: demonic

Winbindd is supposed to have 2 processes running according to the documentation. When I start my samba server (security=ADS), I can see at least 4 Winbindd demons? (A) Is this intended? (B) How can I limit the number of winbindd processes? Kind regards, Jens

Hi guys, I must be missing something obvious with pessimistic locking. Here is what I do (Rails 2.3, mySQL): In my Foo model: def test Foo.transaction do lock = UpdateLockForFoo.find_by_foo_id(self.id, :lock => true) sleep 30 end end For each Foo model, I have an UpdateLockForFoo. This "lock" needs to be acquired before doing any changes to Foo. I believe it works,

I am running a Samba 2.x.x on a Solaris 9 and I get this when I start the demon at the command line. # /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D ld.so.1: /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd: fatal: libpopt.so.0: open failed: No such file or directory Killed Please help. Shreeraj Karulkar (650) 244 4375

Hey all, I've been testing a new release called Hunted - The Demons Forge. I have installed, via winetricks, DirectX9 and the vcrun suite. When running the game for the first time, there was an error concerning eihter Xact or Xinput, so I installed both. After this, the game's spash screen loaded. But shortly after, it quit. The following is the output of wine: Code:

From: Collins Richey <crichey at gmail.com> > It's a little more than that. I find few people who consider RedHat to > be a Demon Evil or that they can't do anything right, but I can > understand the concern about some of their decisions which have made > life difficult for (granted) a few, and it's not really helpful to > demonize those who complain, as Bryan has

Hi there, I'm having a problem with sshd demons not shuting down after connection is closed. The strange thing is that this is happening on both my Redhat 6.2 server and Redhat 7.0, both running OpenSSH_2.3.0p1. I'm positive that KeepAlive is set to yes ! Is this a common problem ? I'm suspecting that is has something to do with the client as well. Think we're all using

Dear experts, excuse me if my terminology is not quite exact, but: Is it possible to configure the AD/LDAP demon integrated in Samba4? Reason for my question is: I have succeeded to bulk insert contacts into the AD, I can edit them with the appropriate Windows 7 tools, and I can read them from Thunderbird and Outlook. Samba even seems to ship with a self-signed certificate for SSL encrypted

Hello Samba developers, First, thank you for your excellent work! I have a naive question, out of curiosity, why is there no samba server support in Linux kernel unlike the cifs client support? Wouldn't it be more easier to use if there is a samba server support in kernel and a corresponding user space demon to control it just like nfsd? Also, I think performance of a kernel space driver

I have now got the tinc demons (on network OFFICES) on BranchB and BranchA talking to each other, see below for log from BranchB. For some trouble shouting issues relating to OsX see at the end of my e-mail. However, I have not yet achieved the network connectivity/routing that I would like. The aim is: BranchB is a laptop I would like to connect it (via tinc) to my office network, so that

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > We would not build and distribute either of these things if they were > not released via the GPL. The RPMS/SRPMS that we are distributing are > indeed GPL. We firmly agree with RedHat on this issue (that only GPL > things should be distributed). The problem is that many distros are statically building MySQL 4 with some

From: "Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org>" > You are indeed correct (I must have been looking at the RHEL3 dir**) First off, that's now 2 strikes for me. Small ones considering the context well outside of the points, but still it hurts my credibility. This is one of the things I hate about meta-discussions, at least how I approach them. Sometimes I just need to learn

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Thanks - as you probably know, the long-winded discussion isn't > really about CIPE specifically so much as the philosophy behind > bundling a few thousand things together and then trying to > please anyone with a blanket policy about maintaining backwards > compatibility vs bug fixes vs new features. You just can't

From: R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> > Bryan - Please don't overstate this and make a problem where > none exists. There is an infinity of choices of which you > list three ... > Nor does one _have_ to 'get involved' with either the > RH-Fedora or Centos project to do effective distribution > building, or add-on packaging. There are independent

Hi all, Sorry if this is out of place, but I've seen people suggesting future functionality for Dovecot on here before. TBH I'm not completely sure if this would be possible in a LDA. Demon (an ISP) have extensions to POP3 they call "SDPS" - there's basically an extra command that can be called for an email and it gives the envelope rcpt and from addresses. I was

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > RHEL-4 shipped with MySQL 4.1.x (and has a 3.23.58 client to work with > older databases) ... the latest SRPMS are mysql-4.1.10a-1.RHEL4.1.src.rpm > and mysqlclient10-3.23.58-4.RHEL4.1.src.rpm. You are indeed correct (I must have been looking at the RHEL3 dir**):

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > If you believe that, you have to believe that Red Hat's programmers > are always better than the original upstream program author. How do you assert that? It has _nothing_ to do with my statement. You keep thinking there is this absolute "black/white" on why developers, vendors, etc... do this or that. There are reasons

On 27 June 2015 at 17:01, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > >> On 2015 Jun 26, at 17:02, Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> >> On 26 June 2015 at 22:53, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com <mailto:chisophugis at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> All of these seem to fall into the pattern of "The compiler

List, Thanks tremendously to JC and JHT for guiding (nay, kicking) me toward getting ACLs to work on RHAS3. Reading the RH sysadmin guide about ACLs and searching elsewhere, as well as thinking for myself, were also a pre. Now for something completely different: High school in Amsterdam Netherlands: - RHAS3 - Samba 3.0.11 RPC, not ADS (no way we're upgrading while the bug reports keep

[ context from the previous thread ] On Saturday 28 May 2005 14:41, Collins Richey wrote: > On 5/28/05, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > Sure. LVM. > I'm curious about this. At work we haven't finished our evaluation of > RHEL3/RHEL4 (CentOS is out of the question, since SLA is king here). > Most of our servers and desktops are RH9 legacy, and we use LVM

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > No, I am looking for a solution that provides what a typical user needs, > not what a particular vendor feels like supporting this week. I didn't > really want this to be about motives for vendor's business decisions but > I think Johnny Hughes nailed it in saying the push for 2.6 was because > SLES 9 had it. Their