Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "demarshallable".
2008 May 08
2
Testing render :text without has_text
...r
layout nil
def query
reports = StatisticsReporter.query params[:query_params]
render :text => Marshal.dump(reports)
end
end
And here''s the test:
describe StatsController do
before :each do
@query_params = { :foo => :bar }
end
it "should return a demarshallable string of the reports" do
reports = [
StatisticsReport.new(:date => nil),
StatisticsReport.new(:bytes_transferred => 0)
]
StatisticsReporter.should_receive(:query).and_return reports
get :query, :query_params => @query_params
# PROBLEM CODE (the equ...
2012 May 25
0
[LLVMdev] generating LLVM code that meets the C ABI
I want to generate LLVM functions that meet the C ABI for function
calls/returns (preferably on multiple platforms but x86_64 would be OK
for now).
I know that LLVM doesn't handle this completely automatically (e.g.
the type {i32,i32} should be passed as a single i64 on x86_64 linux).
Is there any library that automates the generation of function
declarations meeting the ABI and emit
2007 Jun 12
0
[PATCH][libxenapi] Fix segmentaion fault in libxenapi
When calling xen_vbd_set_mode(), libxenapi attempted to convert the enum
mode parameter to a string twice - resulting in segfault. Removed first
conversion since conversion is taking place in marshalling/demarshalling
layer. Fixed similar double enum conversion in other places as well.
Regards,
Jim
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
2006 Mar 23
15
Is Rails Appropriate for our Project?
I realize this subject is redundant for this community, but I''m hoping
the Rails community can provide me with some additional ammunition to
help push a rails project I''m pitching over the proverbial tipping point
at my company.
The Situation:
I''m the lead architect at a large bay area retailer. My team and I are
currently suffering through the process of paying
2016 Mar 28
0
RFC: atomic operations on SI+
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 02:22:11PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
> Hi Tom, Matt,
>
> I'm working on a project that needs few coherent atomic operations (HSA
> mode: load, store, compare-and-swap) for std::atomic_uint in HCC.
>
> the attached patch implements atomic compare and swap for SI+
> (untested). I tried to stay within what was available, but there are
> few issues
2016 Mar 25
2
RFC: atomic operations on SI+
Hi Tom, Matt,
I'm working on a project that needs few coherent atomic operations (HSA
mode: load, store, compare-and-swap) for std::atomic_uint in HCC.
the attached patch implements atomic compare and swap for SI+
(untested). I tried to stay within what was available, but there are
few issues that I was unsure how to address:
1.) it currently uses v2i32 for both input and output. This