search for: demanl

...o suitable demangler, I'd like to write one. Currently, we are using `UnDecorateSymbolName` function, but the function is available only on Windows (which is problematic when you are doing a cross-build), and the function is not thread-safe. These two seem to be an enough reason to have our own demanler. Rui -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170619/a0c0eb62/attachment.html>

...d like to write one. Currently, we > are using `UnDecorateSymbolName` function, but the function is > available only on Windows (which is problematic when you are doing a > cross-build), and the function is not thread-safe. These two seem to > be an enough reason to have our own demanler. > I'm not aware of a suitable one, currently. I agree it would be very useful to have. -- Davide "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more or less solved" -- Henri Poincare _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers...

...ing `UnDecorateSymbolName` function, but the function is >> >> > available only on Windows (which is problematic when you are doing a >> >> > cross-build), and the function is not thread-safe. These two seem to >> >> > be an enough reason to have our own demanler. >> >> > >> >> >> >> I'm not aware of a suitable one, currently. I agree it would be very >> useful to have. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Davide >> >> >> >> "There are no solved problems; the...