search for: deluging

Hi all, Just switched my home computer from Windows 7 to CentOS 6.6 and I'm having a slight bit of trouble with the bittorrent-clients. * Transmission is fine but lacks "a bit" in features. * Vuze is my preferred bt-client but gives me horrendous gfx-artifacts, like not showing the torrent name (it's white text on a white background or some such...). * Deluge is better, and

It seems anyone posting to this list gets a deluge (and I mean a deluge) of virus infected windows garbage. It's basically enough to ruin any email address you sign up to the list with; it doesn't matter if you have a virus scanner integrated with your MTA, I really don't want to see 200 virus notifications a day because i posted to this list. I have been getting about 20MB of swen a

Hello! A few days ago I received a filesystem memory corruption notification from Debian's Linux kernel (2.6.20), which automatically unmounted my root partition. Upon closer investigation, I found that something had overwritten most of my data, XFS's superblocks and other metadata structures. That means from partition offset 0x200. At the time of the error, the only services I was using

Sorin, I recommend you stick to Transmission since it's in Base. I have however issued updated packages for Deluge in my nux-dextop repo if it helps you. Also check rtorrent out. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sorin Srbu" <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> > To: "(centos at

I'm new to Dovecot and will be using it with Postfix. I'm looking for recommendations regarding the use of Dovecot's LDA or LMTP for virtual mailbox delivery. Many of the simple examples on the wiki use LDA. So I've set that up initially. But apparently an advantage of LMTP is recipient verification. So, as I understand it, LMTP would let Postfix know whether or not the

Thanks Jan. I've been trying to obtain an English copy of the Dovecot book for months, prior to starting this project. So far, I just can't find a copy. It's too bad that the author/publisher won't do a second printing or, if they're not interested in making any more money, then release it to the public domain as a PDF. Very frustrating. Michael > -----Original

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just wondering to myself: What made you switch from Windows 7 to CentOS 6.6? Eliezer On 12/28/2014 10:36 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > Hi all, > > Just switched my home computer from Windows 7 to CentOS 6.6 and I'm > having a slight bit of trouble with the bittorrent-clients. > > * Transmission is fine but lacks "a bit"

On Tuesday 05 February 2008 17:22:36 Jaap Suter wrote: > if anybody has time, I would recommend putting a big disclaimer at the top > of the garbage collection page that explains that, for the most part, > garbage collection falls outside of LLVM's domain. Yes. However, I think it would also be extremely productive to have working examples showcasing what LLVM does provide, e.g.

Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> writes: > I recommend you stick to Transmission since it's in Base. For the record and the benefit of anyone reading the list archives, Transmission appears to be in EPEL, not Base.

Help! I have 10 nodes: Ocfs2 1.2.4 RHEL4 U4 (AMD64) Kernel 2.6.9-42.ELsmp While running fsck.ocfs2 I am getting a lot of these. o2fsck_mark_cluster_allocated: Internal logic faliure !! duplicate cluster <bunch of numbers> Then I get a deluge of "Bad magic number in inode while trying to verify the type of directory entry <filename>" Is fsck failing to

CentOS 6.3. *Just* updated, including most current selinux-policy and selinux-policy-targeted. I'm getting tons of these, as in it's just spitting them out when I tail -f /var/log/messages: Sep 13 15:20:51 <server> setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ps from search access on the directory @2. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l d92ec78b-3897-4760-93c5-343a662fec67

> LLVM currently lacks working examples demonstrating the use of garbage > collection... Hello, if anybody has time, I would recommend putting a big disclaimer at the top of the garbage collection page that explains that, for the most part, garbage collection falls outside of LLVM's domain. Right now LLVM advertises itself as "supporting garbage collecting", which although

Thanks again Jan. I appear to have basic LMTP working now (messages are delivered to virtual mailboxes of valid recipients and non-existent recipients are rejected). Cool. Still lots more work to do. But I think I could really use the Dovecot book. I find the wiki to be lacking in explanation. So, too often I'm just copying without knowing the reason why or how some things fit together.

...t sort of diagnostic info and can provide, but below is my build script, my console output, and the output of uname -r. I am currently dependent on the development version of a package, so I'd like to get R-devel up and running if possible. I am sure there is more info I can provide, but before deluging the list with unnecessary output, I thought I would ask first what would be helpfu. Mark #Make R cd ~/R_HOME wget ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/R-devel.tar.gz tar -xzf R-devel.tar.gz cd ~/R_HOME/R-devel mkdir R-build cd R-build ../configure --prefix=/home/mkimpel/R_HOME/R-devel/R-build ma...

Wow.. thanks for the deluge of responses! Aggregate seems like the way to go here. But, suppose that instead of integers in column V2, I actually have dates (and instead of keeping the minimum integer, I want to keep the earliest date): > df =

Hi all, I have a strange setup I am trying to get working. Initally I thought I could set it up by just setting up the correct routes. However after thinking about it I have convinced myself (maybe incorrectly) that I most likely need some sort of advanced NAT/routing setup. Below is a description of the networks involved: Local net (192.168.101.0/24) | | Linux machine eth1

Hi All, Producing release notes at the end of the release is a becoming more of a problem as the project grows. I've been doing this by going through all of the LLVM commits since the last release and pulling out things that I find interesting and potentially impactful to people. However, as the project grows and there are more commits, this has been becoming less and less practical. To

The most crucial difference is that LDA is intended for delivering email to a *real* user. Aki > On June 24, 2016 at 7:59 PM Jan B?ren <jan at kivitendo-premium.de> wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > I'd appreciate comments from experienced users of postfix with dovecot. > > Are > > you using Dovecot LDA or LMTP and why? > I have LMTP with dovecot

El 3/9/18 a les 17:48, Rowland Penny via samba ha escrit: >> >> It doesn't make sense: >> >> 1) why should I need to run smbd if I'm not providing cifs services >> to other computers? > > What are you using the computer for then, it surely isn't for > authentication, that is coming from the DC. I'm using it for what the winbindd man page

IF YOU USE DIRECT MAIL IN YOUR BUSINESS -- THEN READ ON. OTHERWISE, JUST DELETE THIS MESSAGE. Make Every Letter Count - Get Every Letter Opened! Did you know?? According to experts, today's deluged direct mail recipient throws away 26% to 88% of all their "junk mail" UNOPENED! Would you like to increase your responses by an average of 3 to 6 times?? If you would (and who