search for: delivered_to

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "delivered_to".

2011 Jan 12
0
Refilter Mailboxes via Sieve - Missing delivered-to header
...uot;INBOX.REFILTER",) move_on_delete = INBOX.trash [destination] type = MDA_external path = /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver arguments = ("-e", "-f", "%(sender)", "-d", "%(recipient)") user = vmail group = vmail [options] delete = true recieved = false delivered_to = false verbose = 2 I'm using virtual users, so i must use Multidrop. Thanks
2018 Oct 26
0
SIGABRT when fetching encrypted mail with getmail
...befeld at gmx.de')", command="deliver", group="vmail", ignore_stderr="False", path="/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver", unixfrom="False", user="vmail") ? options: ??? delete : True ??? delete_after : 0 ??? delete_bigger_than : 0 ??? delivered_to : False ??? fingerprint : False ??? logfile : logfile(filename="~/.getmail/log") ??? max_bytes_per_session : 0 ??? max_message_size : 0 ??? max_messages_per_session : 0 ??? message_log : ~/.getmail/log ??? message_log_syslog : False ??? message_log_verbose : False ??? read_all :...
2018 Oct 28
2
Panic: file istream-crlf.c: line 24 (i_stream_crlf_read_common): assertion failed: (ret != -2)
Hello, cannot fetch mails from an IMAP folder because of the error in the subject - fetching always stops with SIGABRT. Could anybody help me, please? Kind regards Peter
2018 Oct 30
1
Panic: file istream-crlf.c: line 24 (i_stream_crlf_read_common): assertion failed: (ret != -2)
...befeld at gmx.de')", command="deliver", group="vmail", ignore_stderr="False", path="/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver", unixfrom="False", user="vmail") ? options: ??? delete : True ??? delete_after : 0 ??? delete_bigger_than : 0 ??? delivered_to : False ??? fingerprint : False ??? logfile : logfile(filename="~/.getmail/log") ??? max_bytes_per_session : 0 ??? max_message_size : 0 ??? max_messages_per_session : 0 ??? message_log : ~/.getmail/log ??? message_log_syslog : False ??? message_log_verbose : False ??? read_all :...
2013 Oct 02
1
Dovecot namespace solved while writing; preparing to refilter
Hi! My plea to readers: =================== Pls., people who only want strictly technical issues to read, and frown at any broader context regardless how intrinsically related, but not strictly technically related, it might be, skip all the way, all the way to, search for exact words: "strictly technical" or visually, find two lines of sole "===" characters. Thank you!