search for: deliniated

...ant to avoid spaghetti config, not only is it poor practice, but also nigh on impossible to maintain properly without breaking stuff. Assuming it is possible, how would I go about changing the Centos "dump" based config into a more sensible one where local site customisations are clearly deliniated ?

...ries, and infrastructure in the primary project. 3) A Clang FAQ for the FE-specific stuff. The current FAQ is mostly #2, with a bit of #1, and a lot of out-of-date or flat out wrong information. The current FAQ could probably stay as one page, or be two pages, but it should have a clear and well deliniated split between #1 and #2. We should discuss creating #3 on cfe-dev in a separate thread if you're interested. If you're proposing patches, here are some suggestions as the standard process may not work as well... which others may contradict if they disagree... ;] - Patches to fix the form...

..., not only is it > poor practice, but also nigh on impossible to maintain properly > without breaking stuff. > > Assuming it is possible, how would I go about changing the Centos > "dump" based config into a more sensible one where local site > customisations are clearly deliniated ? > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hadley, With all due respect, I'm not sure what exactly your deliniation between author and contributor is, but from what I can tell I don't agree with it. >From the blogpost regarding your new purrr package: "Purrr wouldn?t be possible without Lionel Henry <https://github.com/lionel->. He wrote a lot of the package and his insightful comments ..." And yet he is

...t;> 3) A Clang FAQ for the FE-specific stuff. >> >> >> The current FAQ is mostly #2, with a bit of #1, and a lot of out-of-date >> or flat out wrong information. The current FAQ could probably stay as one >> page, or be two pages, but it should have a clear and well deliniated split >> between #1 and #2. We should discuss creating #3 on cfe-dev in a separate >> thread if you're interested. >> >> >> If you're proposing patches, here are some suggestions as the standard >> process may not work as well... which others may contradi...

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > >> [...] >> >> At the very least, this is seems to be a flagrant violation of the >> *spirit* of the CRAN policy, which AFAIK is intended to enforce >>

...primary project. > > 3) A Clang FAQ for the FE-specific stuff. > > > The current FAQ is mostly #2, with a bit of #1, and a lot of out-of-date > or flat out wrong information. The current FAQ could probably stay as one > page, or be two pages, but it should have a clear and well deliniated split > between #1 and #2. We should discuss creating #3 on cfe-dev in a separate > thread if you're interested. > > > If you're proposing patches, here are some suggestions as the standard > process may not work as well... which others may contradict if they > disagree...

...Q for the FE-specific stuff. >>> >>> >>> The current FAQ is mostly #2, with a bit of #1, and a lot of out-of-date >>> or flat out wrong information. The current FAQ could probably stay as one >>> page, or be two pages, but it should have a clear and well deliniated split >>> between #1 and #2. We should discuss creating #3 on cfe-dev in a separate >>> thread if you're interested. >>> >>> >>> If you're proposing patches, here are some suggestions as the standard >>> process may not work as well... w...

Guys, that was very interesting and useful stuff you preached there. Mind if I make a patch to the FAQ and include it somewhere? "Q: When should I develop against a branch? A: Only if you are making really big or controversial changes. ... blah blah I am thinking that it would be highly useful for the project, if somebody (yours sincerely) took it upon himself to hunt and gather the very

An example from the sos package: Its DESCRIPTION file says Author: Spencer Graves, Sundar Dorai-Raj, and Romain Francois. However, the package includes a findFn function, whose help file includes an Author(s) section, which reads, "Spencer Graves, Sundar Dorai-Raj, Romain Francois. Duncan Murdoch suggested the "???" alias for "findFn" and contributed the code for

...;>> >>>>> The current FAQ is mostly #2, with a bit of #1, and a lot of >>>>> out-of-date or flat out wrong information. The current FAQ could probably >>>>> stay as one page, or be two pages, but it should have a clear and well >>>>> deliniated split between #1 and #2. We should discuss creating #3 on >>>>> cfe-dev in a separate thread if you're interested. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you're proposing patches, here are some suggestions as the standard >>>>> proces...

...>> >>>> >>>> The current FAQ is mostly #2, with a bit of #1, and a lot of >>>> out-of-date or flat out wrong information. The current FAQ could probably >>>> stay as one page, or be two pages, but it should have a clear and well >>>> deliniated split between #1 and #2. We should discuss creating #3 on >>>> cfe-dev in a separate thread if you're interested. >>>> >>>> >>>> If you're proposing patches, here are some suggestions as the standard >>>> process may not work as we...

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Again, this is branch code, but if I can see something wrong in platform > independent portion, I'll track it on the trunk. > > > I hate to be the one to start this thread, but I have to say it at