search for: delicaci

This email isn't asking for assistance, but I thought R-help readers would find it interesting. This week we offered a half-day introduction to R for researchers at Augsburg University. The response was astonishing. Although Augsburg has no medical faculty and no engineers, there was far too much demand, with interest from every faculty (barring theology, "for one small

Hi Mon Ping, > If I remember correctly, I was also not fond of passing another > TargetAddrSpace reference to the TargetData object. I was hoping that we > could encode the information as a target description string like we do for > ABI information. I just don't want to end up with too many objects that > describe the machine. One can argue that we shouldn't pollute

Hi Matthijs, On Aug 11, 2008, at 4:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > >> I don't have a problem having another class, TargetAddrSpace, to >> store this >> information. However, I don't think it make sense being a >> standalone pass. >> Address spaces seems to part of the TargetData and it seems more >> natural >> to ask the TargetData to

On 8/5/19 3:00 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > The keyboard is USB attached and the external SSD disk is USB attached. WHY? Why would you do that? What's the point of SSD if you reduce the speed to USB? Or just use an old mechanical drive instead. Any issue with that drive will show up as IO Wait - my presumption is that you expect to see that so you're not mentioning it but it's going to

Hi Mon Ping, > I don't have a problem having another class, TargetAddrSpace, to store this > information. However, I don't think it make sense being a standalone pass. > Address spaces seems to part of the TargetData and it seems more natural > to ask the TargetData to return the TargetAddrSpace object (similar to > struct layout) to describe the relationships

fletcher said: > For any consensus to come about, > I think we need to agree on the > fundamental purpose and philosophy of > the consensus we claim to be interested in. it would be nice. > Otherwise many of these discussions will > continue to occur without much hope of > moving forward to any actual outcome/resolution. yep. > it's

Hi, I'm trying to use the solve() function in R to invert a matrix. I get the following error, "Lapack routine dgesv: system is exactly singular" However, My matrix doesn't appear to be singular. [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [1,] 0.99252358 0.93715047 0.7540535 0.4579895 [2,] 0.01607797 0.09616267 0.2452471 0.3088614 [3,] 0.09772828 0.58451468 1.4907090

Hi, The department of economics at our university (Budapest) is planning a course on numerical methods in economics. They are trying to decide which software to use for that, and I would like to advocate R. The other alternative is Matlab. I have found comparisons in terms of computational time for matrix algebra, but I don't think that is relevant: the bottleneck for economists is usually