search for: deliberate

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1662 matches for "deliberate".

2010 Sep 27
1
rsync as a deliberately slow copy?
I'm looking for a way to deliberately copy a large directory tree of files somewhat slowly, rather than as fast as the hardware will allow. The intent is to avoid killing the hardware, especially as I copy multi-gigabyte disk image files. If I copy over the network, say via ssh, I can use --bwlimit. But I'm asking myself if I c...
2003 Mar 17
2
scoping rules; summary
Hi everyone thanks for the replies. The issue was NOT a font problem; I deliberately chose ll1 and l11 as examples of easily confused variable names (evidently these were too easily confused ;-). The code snippet was written as intended, and increment() contained a deliberate, highlighted, bug. I was asking for guidance on avoiding/finding this sort of coding error. That was w...
2017 Apr 26
2
Is there any real downside to constructing the new SimplifyQuery once
..."CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp: // FIXME: Provide TLI, DT, AT to SimplifyInstruction. CorrelatedValuePropagation.cpp: if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(P, DL)) { " (This is because it uses LVI, which requires those things, but it doesn't ask for them itself) Assuming this is not deliberate, it would seem to me to just be easiest to set up the query structure once in the pass and use it everywhere, which would hopefully avoid these issues in the future, besides making most of the call strings dramatically shorter :) Is there any real downside (compile time performance, etc) to this v...
2016 Jun 15
2
Sincos for X86_64's GNUX32 and ARM's GNUEABI/GNUEABIHF enviroments
...does because the guarding condition for this is 'TT.getEnvironment() == Triple::GNU'. The comment in canCombineSinCosLibcall() in LegalizeDAG.cpp suggests that it's intending to use sincos for all GNU environments so I'm wondering whether the exclusion of GNUX32/GNUEABI/GNUEABIHF is deliberate or not. Can anyone confirm? Thanks.
2012 Jan 15
1
[LLVMdev] Unreachable code in Mutex.cpp
...from Mutex.cpp) I've attached a patch containing some other fixes to remove unreachable code in LLVM - this isn't comprehensive, but a start based on -Wunreachable-code. Is this sort of thing OK to commit as I work through it? About the most noteworthy parts are: 1) two instances of code deliberately if(false)ed out with comments explaining that developers can bring it back in once something works or to aid in debugging. I switched these to #if 0 instead - I realize this means those code snippets may bitrot since they won't be compiled anymore. Is this the right thing? Should we have some...
2003 Apr 14
3
Progress Bar
Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.6p1 and 3.6.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version:?Solaris 8 Problem: When copying files between networked systems using "scp", no asterisk characters are displayed on the progress bar as in previous versions of OpenSSH. Is this a deliberate change to "scp"? John Durkin ______________________________________________________________________ Unless expressly stated to the contrary, the views expressed in this email are not necessarily the views of National Grid Transco plc or any of...
2013 Jan 11
3
locating element in distance matrix
Dear useRs, I have a very basic question. I have a distance matrix and i skipped the upper part of it deliberately. The distance matrix is 1000*1000. Then i used "min" command to extract the lowest value from that matrix. Now i want to know what is the location of that lowest element? More precisely, the row and column number of that lowest element. Thanks in advance elisa [[alternati...
2015 Apr 01
2
os-release file doesn't match upstream?
...com/" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=7.1 REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Red Hat Enterprise Linux" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="7.1" Here the version ID is 7.1; different to CentOS. Is this a bug or is it deliberate? -- rgds Stephen
2016 May 17
6
Systemd and VirtualBox
..., John Hodrien wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016, Rob Kampen wrote: > >> No idea where to from here, so if there is anyone that has a working >> systemd autostart VirtualBox setup on a headless CentOS 7 server - >> please advise what you have done to get it working. > > I deliberately bailed on VirtualBox when we moved to C7, as KVM offered > everything I needed with less hassle. > > I take it you've considered switching? > Considered, very briefly. I have had great success and stability with running VirtualBox on both CentOS 5 & 6 for the few Windoze apps...
2010 Feb 26
3
Preserving lists in a function
...uld be the default unless the user impute a different value while executing the function. But a problem arises when a variable in the list is left out completely (not imputed at all). An example is shown below: myfunction( list1=list (variable1=1, variable2=2), #variable 3 deliberately left out list2=list (variable1="variable1", variable3="position changed", variable2="variable2"), list3=list (variable1="character", variable2=24,...
2009 Apr 09
3
vdev_disk_io_start() sending NULL pointer in ldi_ioctl()
Hi All, I have corefile where we see NULL pointer de-reference PANIC as we have sent (deliberately) NULL pointer for return value. vdev_disk_io_start() ... ... error = ldi_ioctl(dvd->vd_lh, zio->io_cmd, (uintptr_t)&zio->io_dk_callback, FKIOCTL, kcred, NULL); ldi_ioctl() expects last parameter as an integ...
2012 Sep 25
3
error on uneven recycling?
...) : longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length can't be made into an error? I realise it was there in S-PLUS, but since it produces a warning there can't be many examples on CRAN or Bioconductor using it, and I can't think of any situation where it would be used deliberately. -thomas -- Thomas Lumley Professor of Biostatistics University of Auckland
2022 Jan 19
3
Ping as regular user not allowed (CentOS Stream 8)
Following some update or the other (I think) on my CentOS Stream 8 system, I'm no longer able to use ping as a regular user; I get $ ping www.centos.org ping: socket: Operation not permitted Does anyone else see this? It it a bug, or were the system/default permissions deliberately changed? Can anyone suggest a fix/workaround? Actually, I can find several different ones via a simple web search, but they are generally related to other distributions, I'm not quite sure which would be the most appropriate for CentOS... Thanks. - Toralf
1999 Nov 08
1
loading precedence in requires()
It appears that requires(), when it appears in the .First.lib of a package, will load the required package *after* the package requiring it, i.e. the 'required' package appears earlier in the search list than the package requiring it. This will cause problems if a package (deliberately) masks any of the functions in the required package. I.e. the expected masking does not occur. Apart from expecting the end-user to issue a library() call for the required package before the requiring package, are there any workarounds for this, or is such deliberate masking considered to be a n...
1999 Nov 08
1
loading precedence in requires()
It appears that requires(), when it appears in the .First.lib of a package, will load the required package *after* the package requiring it, i.e. the 'required' package appears earlier in the search list than the package requiring it. This will cause problems if a package (deliberately) masks any of the functions in the required package. I.e. the expected masking does not occur. Apart from expecting the end-user to issue a library() call for the required package before the requiring package, are there any workarounds for this, or is such deliberate masking considered to be a n...
2016 May 31
2
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau/acpi: fix lockup with PCIe runtime PM
...on, May 30, 2016 at 06:13:51PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote: > Do you have any suggestions for the case where the pcieport driver > refuses to put the bridge in D3 (because the BIOS is too old)? In that > case the nouveau driver needs to fallback to the DSM method (but not > when runtime PM is deliberately disabled by writing control=on). Do you know what Windows does then? I think we should do the same if possible. If user has disabled runtime PM from the root port deliberately, there might be good reason to do so. Why we want to fallback to something that could cause problems? I mean _DSM on su...
2016 Jun 04
1
RProfmem output format
...", TYPEOF(fun) == SYMSXP ? CHAR(PRINTNAME(fun)) : "<Anonymous>"); } } if (newline) fprintf(file, "\n"); } Thomas, your last comment was: > Yes. It's obviously better to always print a newline, and so clearly > deliberate not to, that I suspect there may have been a good reason. > If I can't work it out (after my grant deadline this week) I will just > assume it's wrong. When I search the code and the commit history (https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/3d5eb2a09f2d75893efdc8bbf1c72d17603886a0), it...
2024 Jan 23
2
ntlm_auth not returning "STATUS_OK"
...us version, then the new version ought to have a different name or a switch enabling the new/changed feature. Since the 4.18.9 ntlm_auth output has an oddly placed colon (:) in the string, as if some text was supposed to come before that, I'll assume this was an inadvertant omission and not a deliberate change to the output response of this program, espcially given that the other responses (full text): NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER: The specified account does not exist. (0xc0000064) NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD: When trying to update a password, this return status indicates that the value provided as the cu...
2015 May 04
2
Why is the diag function so slow (for extraction)?
(I asked this question on StackOverflow <http://stackoverflow.com/q/30035939/1191259> a short time ago; sorry if you're seeing it again. Feel free to answer there as well if you like. The code formatting and such on that site can be nice.) I benchmarked matrix and vector subsetting to extract the diagonal of a square matrix against the diag() function, and the latter lost by a wide
2015 May 05
3
Why is the diag function so slow (for extraction)?
...I'm still wondering why diag() uses c()...? With it being so slow, I'd >> be inclined to write a qdiag() without the c() and just use that the next >> time I need matrix algebra. Any insight would be appreciated; thanks! > > Well, there are two possibilities: Either it is deliberate or it isn't. > > The latter isn't too unlikely, given that the effect is seen for large matrices. I would appear to be a matter of O(n) (picking out n items) vs. O(n^2) (copying an n x n matrix), but this might drown out in a context involving matrix multiplication and/or inversion, b...