Displaying 20 results from an estimated 34 matches for "deletenod".
Did you mean:
deletenode
2014 May 12
1
errors in replication after adding dns records. ( 4.1.7 )
Hai,
?
Im getting errors now im filling the dns ( through windows tools and samba-tool )
( OS : Debian wheezy, Sernet samba 4.1.7 )
?
On my AD DC, im seeing the following in the log file when i restart samba.
?
May 12 10:59:36 dc1 samba[2170]:?? enteddnsserver: zone operation 'DeleteNode' not implementeddnsserver: zone operation 'DeleteNode' not implementeddnsserver: zone operation 'DeleteNode' not implementeddnsserver: zone operation 'DeleteNode' not implementeddnsserver: zone operation 'DeleteNode' not implementedDsCrackNames: Unsupported oper...
2017 Oct 03
1
Deletion in Binary Search Tree
...code snippet below for an usecase where the node to be
deleted would have a leftnode and no rightnode. I am stuck up at how to
release the node pertaining to the key value given by the function
call and then
assigning the leftnode in place of the deleted note.
Any help would be appreciated .
deletenode<-function(node,key)
{
if(identical(node,NULL)==TRUE)
{
return(node)
}
else
{
if(key<node$key)
{
node$leftnode<-deletenode(node$leftnode,key)
}
if(key>node$key)
{
node$leftnode<- deletenode(node$rightnode,key)...
2011 Aug 26
2
[LLVMdev] Dead node removal in DAGCombiner
Is this piece of code in DAGCombiner::visitLOAD removing a dead node?
06155 if (N->use_empty()) {
06156 removeFromWorkList(N);
06157 DAG.DeleteNode(N);
06158 }
If it is, is there a reason it doesn't push its operands to the work
list as done in line 974-975?
00970 // If N has no uses, it is dead. Make sure to revisit all
N's operands once
00971 // N is deleted from the DAG, since they too may now be dead
or may have...
2012 Jan 12
3
[LLVMdev] 'opt' Aborted "While deleting: void %"
...f6a5b1ec llvm::Value::~Value() + 58
7 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf66ee041 llvm::User::~User() + 93
8 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf6a00d89 llvm::Instruction::~Instruction() + 121
9 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf6a0351f llvm::CallInst::~CallInst() + 57
10 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf68d9671
llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode(llvm::Instruction*)
+ 30
11 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf68d8c80 llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction>
>::erase(llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>) + 48
12 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf696ac37 llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instructi...
2011 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Dead node removal in DAGCombiner
Hi Akira,
> Is this piece of code in DAGCombiner::visitLOAD removing a dead node?
>
> 06155 if (N->use_empty()) {
> 06156 removeFromWorkList(N);
> 06157 DAG.DeleteNode(N);
> 06158 }
yes.
> If it is, is there a reason it doesn't push its operands to the work
> list as done in line 974-975?
>
> 00970 // If N has no uses, it is dead. Make sure to revisit all
> N's operands once
> 00971 // N is deleted from the DAG, si...
2012 Jan 12
0
[LLVMdev] 'opt' Aborted "While deleting: void %"
...lue() + 58
> 7 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf66ee041 llvm::User::~User() + 93
> 8 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf6a00d89 llvm::Instruction::~Instruction() + 121
> 9 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf6a0351f llvm::CallInst::~CallInst() + 57
> 10 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf68d9671
> llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode(llvm::Instruction*)
> + 30
> 11 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf68d8c80 llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
> llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction>
>> ::erase(llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>) + 48
> 12 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf696ac37 llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
> llvm::i...
2012 Jan 25
2
[LLVMdev] PLEASE help with Alias Analysis initialization assertion at the end of my pass
...ized
out>) at /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/lib/VMCore/Instruction.cpp:54 #11
0xf7275461 in ~GetElementPtrInst (this=0x8147000, __in_chrg=<value
optimized out>) at
/x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/Instructions.h:285 #12 0xf7136671 in
llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode (V=0x8147000) at
/x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:112 #13 0xf7135c80 in
llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction, llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction>
>::erase (this=0x8145d14,
where=...)
at /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:463 #14
0xf71c7c37 in llvm::...
2012 Jan 13
1
[LLVMdev] 'opt' Aborted "While deleting: void %"
...7 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf66ee041 llvm::User::~User() + 93
>> 8 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf6a00d89 llvm::Instruction::~Instruction() + 121
>> 9 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf6a0351f llvm::CallInst::~CallInst() + 57
>> 10 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf68d9671
>>
llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode(llvm::Instruction*)
>> + 30
>> 11 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf68d8c80 llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
>> llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction>
>>> ::erase(llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>) + 48
>> 12 libLLVM-2.9.so 0xf696ac37 llvm::iplist<llvm::Instr...
2012 Jan 25
1
[LLVMdev] PLEASE help with Alias Analysis initialization assertion at the end of my pass
....9/lib/VMCore/Instruction.cpp:54
#11
>> 0xf7275461 in ~GetElementPtrInst (this=0x8147000, __in_chrg=<value
>> optimized out>) at
>> /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/Instructions.h:285 #12 0xf7136671
>> in
>> llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode (V=0x8147000) at
>> /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:112 #13 0xf7135c80 in
>> llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction, llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction>
>>> ::erase (this=0x8145d14,
>>
>> where=...)
>>
>> at /x/grwright/llvm/l...
2012 Jan 25
0
[LLVMdev] PLEASE help with Alias Analysis initialization assertion at the end of my pass
...t /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/lib/VMCore/Instruction.cpp:54 #11
> 0xf7275461 in ~GetElementPtrInst (this=0x8147000, __in_chrg=<value
> optimized out>) at
> /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/Instructions.h:285 #12 0xf7136671 in
> llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode (V=0x8147000) at
> /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:112 #13 0xf7135c80 in
> llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction, llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction>
>> ::erase (this=0x8145d14,
>
> where=...)
>
> at /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ili...
2012 Jan 23
1
[LLVMdev] Assertion `AA && "AA didn't call InitializeAliasAnalysis in its run method!"' failed.
...optimized
out>) at /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/lib/VMCore/Instruction.cpp:54
#11 0xf7275461 in ~GetElementPtrInst (this=0x8147000, __in_chrg=<value
optimized out>) at
/x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/Instructions.h:285
#12 0xf7136671 in llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode
(V=0x8147000) at /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:112
#13 0xf7135c80 in llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction> >::erase (this=0x8145d14, where=...)
at /x/grwright/llvm/llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:463
#14 0xf71c7c37 in llvm::iplist&...
2012 Feb 03
3
[LLVMdev] How can I see what opt tries to delete at the end of a pass?
...5655d1ec llvm::Value::~Value() + 58
7 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x561f0041 llvm::User::~User() + 93
8 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x56502d89 llvm::Instruction::~Instruction() + 121
9 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x5650551f llvm::CallInst::~CallInst() + 57
10 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x563db671
llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode(llvm::Instruction*)
+ 30
11 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x563dac80 llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction>
>::erase(llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>) + 48
12 libLLVM-2.9.so 0x5646cc37 llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instructi...
2010 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] Illegal optimization in LLVM 2.8 during SelectionDAG? (Re: comparison pattern trouble - might be a bug in LLVM 2.8?)
...t; Tmp.getNode()->dump(&DAG);
>> dbgs()<< '\n');
>> WorkListRemover DeadNodes(*this);
>> DAG.ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith(N1, Tmp,&DeadNodes);
>> removeFromWorkList(TheXor);
>> DAG.DeleteNode(TheXor);
>> return DAG.getNode(ISD::BRCOND, N->getDebugLoc(),
>> MVT::Other, Chain, Tmp, N2);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> if (Op0.getOpcode() != ISD::SETCC&& Op1.getOpcode() != ISD::SETCC) {
>> b...
2018 Nov 27
2
GlobalVariable::eraseFromParent
I am confused by GlobalVariable::eraseFromParent's declaration:
/// This method unlinks 'this' from the containing module and deletes it.
void eraseFromParent();
In Globals.cpp the unlinking is done and SymbolTableListTraits cleans up
the symbol table but I don't see anything that actually deletes the
object. Is the comment misleading or am I missing something?
2006 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Testing a register allocator
...ource/Applications/Burg test.
I run bugpoint and it gives me bugpoint-reduced-simplified.bc.
I run llc on this file with all LLVM register allocators and it gives the
same result (under gdb):
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00634572 in (anonymous namespace)::X86DAGToDAGISel::DeleteNode (
this=0x4c3b710, N=0x4c3e5c0)
at /llvm/obj/lib/Target/X86/X86GenDAGISel.inc:77
77 SDNode *Operand = I->Val;
SEGFAULT seems to come before register allocation pass is being run.
Thanks.
--
Three things are certain:
Death, taxes, and lost data.
Guess which has occurred.
----...
2011 Feb 24
2
[LLVMdev] Valgrind memcheck errors in llvm
...Reader.cpp:2660)
==24227== Mismatched free() / delete / delete []
==24227== at 0x4025504: operator delete(void*) (vg_replace_malloc.c:387)
==24227== by 0x9C69C09: llvm::BasicBlock::~BasicBlock() (BasicBlock.cpp:83)
==24227== by 0x9C6B509:
llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::BasicBlock>::deleteNode(llvm::BasicBlock*) (in
/usr/local/llvm/svn-r126022.dbg/lib/libLLVM-2.9svn.so)
==24227== by 0x9C6B103: llvm::iplist<llvm::BasicBlock,
llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::BasicBlock>
>::erase(llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::BasicBlock>) (ilist.h:463)
==24227== by 0x9C69D1E: llvm::Basi...
2010 Sep 30
4
[LLVMdev] Illegal optimization in LLVM 2.8 during SelectionDAG? (Re: comparison pattern trouble - might be a bug in LLVM 2.8?)
...dbgs() << "\nWith: ";
Tmp.getNode()->dump(&DAG);
dbgs() << '\n');
WorkListRemover DeadNodes(*this);
DAG.ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith(N1, Tmp, &DeadNodes);
removeFromWorkList(TheXor);
DAG.DeleteNode(TheXor);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::BRCOND, N->getDebugLoc(),
MVT::Other, Chain, Tmp, N2);
}
}
if (Op0.getOpcode() != ISD::SETCC && Op1.getOpcode() != ISD::SETCC) {
bool Equal = false;
if (ConstantSDNode *RHSCI = dyn_cast...
2011 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace
...e2
> llvm::Instruction::~Instruction() + 114
> 9 opt 0x0000000000ccbf68 llvm::CallInst::~CallInst() + 58
> 10 opt 0x0000000000ccbf9a llvm::CallInst::~CallInst() + 24
> 11 opt 0x00000000008db456
> llvm::ilist_node_traits<llvm::Instruction>::deleteNode(llvm::Instruction*)
> + 42
> 12 opt 0x00000000008d9ffd llvm::iplist<llvm::Instruction,
> llvm::ilist_traits<llvm::Instruction>
> >::erase(llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::Instruction>) + 43
> 13 opt 0x0000000000cca004
> llvm::Instruction::e...
2010 Oct 01
0
[LLVMdev] Illegal optimization in LLVM 2.8 during SelectionDAG? (Re: comparison pattern trouble - might be a bug in LLVM 2.8?)
..."\nWith: ";
> Tmp.getNode()->dump(&DAG);
> dbgs() << '\n');
> WorkListRemover DeadNodes(*this);
> DAG.ReplaceAllUsesOfValueWith(N1, Tmp, &DeadNodes);
> removeFromWorkList(TheXor);
> DAG.DeleteNode(TheXor);
> return DAG.getNode(ISD::BRCOND, N->getDebugLoc(),
> MVT::Other, Chain, Tmp, N2);
> }
> }
>
> if (Op0.getOpcode() != ISD::SETCC && Op1.getOpcode() != ISD::SETCC) {
> bool Equal = false;
> if...
2006 Sep 03
7
[LLVMdev] Testing a register allocator
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>> BTW, how can I run all tests only on LLC to reduce the amount of time to
>> wait until tests are finished, if it's possible?
>
> In my previous reply to your question, I suggested you look at
> TEST.llc.Makefile and TEST.llc.report in the test directory. Modifying
> those makefile/report files to use your register allocator