search for: deleglis

On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Hi, > > in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on > your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of > write operations. > > If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, > this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot >

Hi, Just out of curiosity what is in nfsv4 delegation that you think would give a benefit on your configuration? If I read back the thread you seem to have dovecot configured with director ring in front of the backends. In that case Dovecot already manages storage in a way that only one of the backends is accessing each users data at a time. So I can?t see anything but problems form enabling

2016-05-19 19:06 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 19/05/16 17:37, lejeczek wrote: > >> >> >> On 19/05/16 16:49, Rowland penny wrote: >> >>> On 19/05/16 15:50, lejeczek wrote: >>> >>>> fellow users >>>> >>>> I'd like to ask is it possible, and if yes what's the correct way to

Hi, in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of write operations. If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR, this means that NFS/Dovecot clients are caching data (mainly dovecot index files) but they have to revalidate the cache frequently asking to the NFS

Hi all, Playing with delegation today we delegated rights to some user on some OU and its contents for it can modify users inside that OU and children. We used "advanced view" in ADUC then "properties" on our delegated OU, then "security" tab, and finally we gave rights to our user. Perhaps this process is not correct but we believe it is a valid process to delegate

just a quick update: no issues with NFSv4.0 (load is slowly growing, currently ~7k mailboxes) instead, bad news from delegation front, we enabled it for a couple of days but we ran in ugly issues: processes went in "uninterruptible sleep" state, load average gets huge, reboot was the only escape :-( -brd Alessio Cecchi wrote: > Il 12/06/2015 13:02, brd ha scritto: > >Alessio

List: Sorry for posting to this list but could not find step by step instructions anywhere nor get any concerned list to respond. Newbie to DNS technicals but can work with instructions if given in ./configure for complete idiots ;-) 1. I have taken a static IP from my ISP 203.134.221.162 and the ISP has put up an entry in APNIC whois (please check the same)...to me it seems incomplete, as it

On 2015-10-29 12:23, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 09:47, Davor Vusir wrote: >> On 2015-10-29 09:52, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 29/10/15 08:34, Davor Vusir wrote: >>>> Hi all! >>>> >>>> We have got many delegations in our AD. To add a certain >>>> administrator group to the local Administrators group you can use

mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: > I'm thick :D > I don't really understand more :( > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more enlightning: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg123646.html. > Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also

hi all, i'm managing a large installation of a dovecot cluster in director + NFS backend architecture and we are moving from NFSv3 to NFSv4. Our NFS server is a Netapp in clustered mode and reading technical specs of NFSv4 delegation feature it seems that enabling delegation in this type of dovecot architecture should bring great benefits: only one backend server access a specific mailbox at a

Il 18/08/2015 17:25, Tom Talpey ha scritto: > On 8/18/2015 10:46 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> in this tipical setup (Dovecot/Director thate share Maildir via NFS) on >> your NFS Server you have (about) 90% of read operations and only 10% of >> write operations. >> >> If you see detailed stats for NFS operations you have 40-50% of GETATTR,

On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >> >> >> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>> I'm thick :D >>> I don't really understand more :( >>> >> >> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more >> enlightning: >>

On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: > > > mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >> I'm thick :D >> I don't really understand more :( >> > > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more > enlightning: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and >

Hi, Following that link https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/932455 we created a delegation to permit some group to add computers into AD. That works except if some computer with same name was already added (even if this computer with same name was previously cleanly removed from AD). Anyone who has idea what we missed? Cheers, M.

ZFS Fans, Here''s a list of features that we are proposing for Solaris 10u5. Keep in mind that this is subject to change. Features: PSARC 2007/142 zfs rename -r PSARC 2007/171 ZFS Separate Intent Log PSARC 2007/197 ZFS hotplug PSARC 2007/199 zfs {create,clone,rename} -p PSARC 2007/283 FMA for ZFS Phase 2 PSARC/2006/465 ZFS Delegated Administration PSARC/2006/577 zpool property to

I'm thick :D I don't really understand more :( Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also acting as a users database. All that can be managed from Windows side or Linux side. Delegation on Windows is quiet well documented I expect by Microsoft itself and in the Samba Wiki. According to that I expect your question is about how to delegate Samba management

On 2015-10-30 09:07, Davor Vusir wrote: > On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >>> >>> >>> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>>> I'm thick :D >>>> I don't really understand more :( >>>> >>> >>> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these

On 2015-10-29 09:52, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 08:34, Davor Vusir wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> We have got many delegations in our AD. To add a certain >> administrator group to the local Administrators group you can use GPO >> for Windowsservers. As Samba does not understand GPO I have initially >> used the "username map" feature to add a

This is not a big deal, but DelegateClass fails with rspec when methods are defined in the the delegating class. Here''s code that demonstrates: require ''delegate'' gem ''rspec'' # Version 1.0.5 ############################################################ # CONTROL EXAMPLE: Works FINE. ############################################################ class

Hi all! We have got many delegations in our AD. To add a certain administrator group to the local Administrators group you can use GPO for Windowsservers. As Samba does not understand GPO I have initially used the "username map" feature to add a domain account to become root. After the appropriate group is added via Computer Management MMC by the delegated administrator, the line