search for: delaylog

...ch none used. If I change quota to x, windows explorer reports 2x space of which none used. So I assume samba is somehow getting (albeit incomplete and incorrect) xfs quota info from operating system. disks are as follow: /dev/mapper/storage-samba_home on /samba_home type xfs (rw,relatime,attr2,delaylog,usrquota) /dev/mapper/storage-samba_share on /samba_share type xfs (rw,relatime,attr2,delaylog,usrquota) sudo xfs_info /samba_home/ meta-data=/dev/mapper/storage-samba_home isize=256 agcount=24, agsize=32768000 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2 data =...

W dniu 2014-12-01 o 18:19, Alessio Cecchi pisze: > > Il 01/12/2014 17:24, absolutely_free at libero.it ha scritto: >> Hi, >> I'm going to set up a new storage for our email users (about 10k). >> It's a network attached storage (Coraid). >> In your opinion, what is the best file system for mail server >> (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? >> Thank you

...e when it comes to NFS access. Even though files are visible in a terminal and can be accessed with standard shell tools and vi, this software typically complains that the files are empty or not syntactically correct. The NFS filesystems in question are 8TB+ XFS filesystems mounted with "delaylog,inode64,logbsize=32k,logdev=/dev/sda2,nobarrier,quota" options, and I suspect that inode64 may have to do with the observed behaviour. The server is running CentOS 6.3 + all patches. The clients exhibiting the problem are running CentOS 5.4 and CentOS 5.8 x84_64. Interesting enough, the a...

...39;m unable to pinpoint at the moment. For some reason I am simply unable to get xfs_quotas to report correctly on a freshly installed, fully patched CentOS 6 box. I have specified all the same options as on another machine which *is* reporting quota LABEL=TEST /exports/TEST xfs inode64,nobarrier,delaylog,usrquota,grpquota 0 0 xfs_quota -xc 'limit -u bsoft=900m bhard=1g user' /exports/TEST however xfs_quota -xc 'report -hu' /exports/ reports back nothing pertaining to the user but if a do a quota user I get information back Disk quotas for user user (uid 67876): Filesyste...

Hello, I'm in the process of finalizing the spec for my new dovecot VM, and this is the last question I need to address... I've read until I'm just about decided on XFS, but I have no experience with it (been using reiserfs on my old box (@ 8 yrs old now), and never had a problem (knock on wood), but considering its current situation (little to no development support for reasons

...;> (pop3/imap/webmail) purpose? >>> Thank you >> Hi, >> >> XFS, if you can use RHEL/CentOS 6, ext4 with others distro. > Hi! > Does XFS works better on RHEL than on others distro?;) Yes, because in the kernel of RHEL (>= 6) there are some patchs/options (like delaylog) not present in others distro (like Debian 6) with default kernel.

...een rock-solid and fast since 2008 for me, but it has an > achilles heel of its own: if I need to remove lots of files from a huge > directory tree, the delete performance is quite sucky compared to other > file systems. This has been improved in the later kernel versions with > the new delaylog parameter, but how much, I've not yet tested. > > All this said, the performance of ext3 should not be THAT bad you are > describing. Is the bonnie result done while the server is idle or while > it has mail clients accessing it all the time? If you have hardware > RAID, is there...