search for: degenerates

If there is no free space, the free space allocator will try to get space from the block group with the degenerated profile. For example, if there is no free space in the RAID1 block groups, the allocator will try to allocate space from the DUP block groups. And besides that, the space reservation has the similar behaviour: if there is no enough space in the space cache to reserve, it will reserve

Recently, I ran rsync and got the following message: skipping non-regular file "981005_plteph-de405s.bsp" It turns out that the file in question is really a degenerate link that points back to itself. lrwxr-xr-x 1 18450 other 24 May 9 20:38 981005_plteph-de405s.bsp -> 981005_PLTEPH-DE405S.bsp The confusing this is that although rsync printed what looks like an

Hello: [Kindly Cc when replying] The question in a nutshell is this: Is there a more robust alternative to Ecdf ()? The details: I've used Ecdf () _a lot_ over the past few years and I have learned to live with its warnings. But I am running short on time and patience now [*] Here is a reproducible example: > library (Hmisc) > x <- read.csv ( file =

RPART doesn't seem to handle the degenerate case when all training samples are drawn from a single class: > TrainType [1] 0 0 0 0 > TrainDat V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 1 0.6434392 0.5105860 0.3048803 0.3161728 0.5449632 2 0.1710005 0.5973921 0.1267061 0.6146834 0.7299928 3 0.6919125 0.8880789 0.9123243 0.9061885 0.9553663 4 0.3094843 0.6475508

Hi I am a new R user and I did try elrm package to do Exact Logistic regression for my dataset ( about 170 patients with a binary dependent variable against age and 6 other binary covariates), I did not have n column because it was about individuals, I made n column with 1 for each individual, here is my code and result: > > #### Libraries needed #### > >

> > As long as the committee remains unimportant, things will be fine. > > As soon as the committee becomes important, the LLVM project has already > > degenerated into a snake pit, and is likely to fork anyway. > > This sounds like an oxymoron, as if this policy only makes sense if > the non-representative foundation never tries to enforce it in a way > that the

Hello everybody! We have a interesting issue about dovecot behavior here. First, the scenario: We have 2 server running with the same load, one with our old pop3 solution (out of date) and other with Dovecot. We realized that dovecot are comsuming more CPU, and this consumption is growing day by day. When we starts dovecot, it runs between 40%-45% of CPU consumption and our old

What should findInterval(x,vec,all.inside=TRUE) return when length(vec)<=1, so there are no inside intervals? R-3.3.0 gives a decreasing map of x->output when length(vec)==1 and -1's when length(vec)==0. Would '0' in all those cases be better? > findInterval(x=c(10, 11, 12), vec=11, all.inside=TRUE, rightmost.closed=FALSE, left.open=FALSE) [1] 1 0 0 >

Hi Hadley, Thanks for the counterpoint. Response below. On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:59 PM Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > The existing behaviour seems inutitive to me. I would consider these > invariants for n vector x_i's each with size m: > > * nrow(rbind(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n)) equals n > Personally, no I wouldn't. I would consider m==0 a degenerate

Greetings. At the moment, I'm applying R to some AIX 'nmon' output, trying to get a handle on some disk performance metrics. In case anyone's interested: http://docs.osg.ufl.edu/tsm/pdf/ some of them are more edifying than others. (ahem) I'm trying to develop a somewhat general framework for plotting these measures, in the hopes that it's of some use to people other

I'm a big fan of both Weka and R (quite new at R :) ), and jumped at the chance to use them together. Unfortunately, I'm running into what is probably a dumb error when trying to view info about my model. A Google search turned up 0 hits for the actual error I got (last line), but you all are smarter! My code is below, but basically my data frame (q) is imported via RODBC and has 1586

On 21 May 2015, at 12:49 , Martin Maechler <maechler at lynne.stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> >>>>>> on Thu, 21 May 2015 11:03:05 +0200 writes: > >> On 21 May 2015, at 10:35 , Martin Maechler <maechler at lynne.stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > >>>> >>>> I noticed that

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:27 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:23 AM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Alternatively we can really say this header is a textual header - it's >> included generally only once in a whole program, the functions are called >> only once, etc. Though

FWIW, I've just imported my mng-over-ogg code into xiph.org cvs. There are currently too tools, both under the new 'ogg-tools' module: 'oggmerge' is intended to multiplex files of various formats into a single ogg bitstream. Currently it only creates degenerate mng-over-ogg files. Next step is to add support for multiplexing with ogg vorbis files, and jack will likely be

My only alternate ideas are: a) To heck with this only a single target thing. b) Autogenerate the entire file and library support as part of the build and have the various functions "defined" in the appropriate libraries. I don't really think a) is feasible, and b) is a bit of a stretch too. :\ -eric On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:37 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>

On Mar 11, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> I think the test case is bogus in terms of language correctness, > > Why? My gut. I listen to my gut. More seriously, C99 section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 has: > When a value is stored in an object of structure or union type, > including in a member > object, the bytes of the object representation that correspond to

I want to maximize a conditional likelihood function that is basically logistic conditional on the number of successes within strata. What would be a good starting place for this? A complication is that the denominator includes a term that is the sum over all permutations. Although there is no time dimension to the problem, it's possible a degenerate use of the Cox proportional hazards

Could you guys clarify one thing for me? It sounds like the idea is that the current model of configuring the selection of targets would go away, to be replaced by an all-or-native-only switch. Sometimes I like to configure X86+ARM because that reduces rebuild time and still gets me the vast majority of debug-info tests. Or maybe you're using "all" as a shorthand for "all

Hi Fellows, I notice an unexpected behavior in RegionInfo's block_iterator. Consider the following situation: a user creates her own region containing just a single basic block TheBB, then tries to have the block_iterator to print a DFS traversal of the region. The expected behavior should be that only the single basic block TheBB will be printed, but the real behavior is that

Hiya everyone, Is there a way to disable a thread that has degenerated into flaming? The recent "discussion" on /var/run descended into some quite nasty places and perhaps a lid should have been put on it. This seems to happen every few weeks and is somewhat embarrassing when I'm trying to persuade people of the "active and friendly Centos community" It was a shame that