search for: degen

...be placed > in a sieve_before script. > > For more information: > > [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-4.3 [1] > [2]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-2.10.2 [2] > [3]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3894 [3] > [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-degener-sieve-multiscript-00 [4] > > Regards, > > Stephan. Thanks Stephan, However still have one small issue: fileter.sieve ========== # rule:[amavis] if anyof (address :contains "From" "amavis", address :contains "Cc" "amavis-users at amavis.or...

...executed must be placed > in a sieve_before script. > > For more information: > > [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-4.3 > [2]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-2.10.2 > [3]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3894 > [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-degener-sieve-multiscript-00 > > Regards, > > Stephan. > Thanks Stephan, However still have one small issue: fileter.sieve ========== # rule:[amavis] if anyof (address :contains "From" "amavis", address :contains "Cc" "amavis-users at amavis.or...

Hello, i do some tests with sieve editheader extensions. deleteheader and addheader are working, but i noticed that new headerlines are always prepended to current header. So new lines can be found always on top. I am looking for a possibility to edit a headerline in place, without moving the new line to top of stack(replaceheader?). It is not looking good if a Subject-Line suddenly moves to

...l/rfc3894>] and >>>> without performing an explicit "keep" [2 >>>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-2.10.2>] >>>> anywhere, the subsequent sieve_after scripts are not executed [4 >>>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-degener-sieve-multiscript-00>]. >>>> >>>> Therefore sieve_after is only useful to provide default behavior for >>>> when the user has no explicit rule for what should happen to the >>>> e-mail. >>>> >>>>> `/home/vpopmail/domain...

...waysinline nounwind alignstack=4 } void @foo() #1 { ret void } An object may refer to more than one attribute group. In that situation, the attributes are merged. Attribute groups are important for keeping `.ll' files readable, because a lot of functions will use the same attributes. In the degenerative case of a `.ll' file that corresponds to a single `.c' file, the single `attrgroup' will capture the command line flags used to build that file. Target-Dependent Attributes in IR --------------------------------- The front-end is responsible for knowing which target-dependent o...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello guys, I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: So: plugin { quota = maildir quota_rule2 = INBOX.Trash:ignore quota_rule3 = INBOX.Sent:ignore sieve = ~/Maildir/sieve/dovecot1.sieve sieve_before = /etc/dovecot/sieve/global.sieve sieve_after =

...ide of > the Attributes class. The target's back-end is responsible for interpreting > target-dependent attributes. > > Attributes should be documented in the language reference document. Target specific attributes should probably be listed in the target-specific section of docs/CodeGenerator.rst. > The core of this proposal is the idea of an "attribute group". As the name > implies, it's a group of attributes that are then referenced by objects within > the IR. An attribute group is a module-level object. The BNF of the syntax is: > > attribute_gro...

...{ ret void } >> >> An object may refer to more than one attribute group. In that situation, the >> attributes are merged. >> >> Attribute groups are important for keeping `.ll' files readable, because a lot >> of functions will use the same attributes. In the degenerative case of a `.ll' >> file that corresponds to a single `.c' file, the single `attrgroup' will capture >> the command line flags used to build that file. > > A few comments on the new syntax: > > 1. I think most folks will understand what 'attrgroup...

...@foo() attrgroup(#1) { ret void } > > An object may refer to more than one attribute group. In that situation, the > attributes are merged. > > Attribute groups are important for keeping `.ll' files readable, because a lot > of functions will use the same attributes. In the degenerative case of a `.ll' > file that corresponds to a single `.c' file, the single `attrgroup' will capture > the command line flags used to build that file. A few comments on the new syntax: 1. I think most folks will understand what 'attrgroup' means, but it is a litt...

...l group called packages. Therefore i never install as root anymore, and i can uninstall a program simply by removing all files from that user. What's the best way to install wine on this system? Thanks in advance, cedric -- The only dumb question is the one omitted De enige domme vraag is degene die niet gesteld wordt

hello winers! has anyone a kind of debug channels documentation? i mean that parameters after "--debugmsg" like: "+relay,+loaddll,+reg"... i need to see network stuff in the debug messages. thanx, cheers! rxon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20040802/0b9fca0a/attachment.htm

...ator policies that always need to be executed must be placed in a sieve_before script. For more information: [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-4.3 [2]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-2.10.2 [3]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3894 [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-degener-sieve-multiscript-00 Regards, Stephan.

...in a sieve_before script. >> >> For more information: >> >> [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-4.3 >> [2]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5228#section-2.10.2 >> [3]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3894 >> [4]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-degener-sieve-multiscript-00 >> >> Regards, >> >> Stephan. >> > Thanks Stephan, > > However still have one small issue: > > fileter.sieve > ========== > > # rule:[amavis] > if anyof (address :contains "From" "amavis", >...

...ounwind, alignstack=4 } void @foo() attrgroup(#1) { ret void } An object may refer to more than one attribute group. In that situation, the attributes are merged. Attribute groups are important for keeping `.ll' files readable, because a lot of functions will use the same attributes. In the degenerative case of a `.ll' file that corresponds to a single `.c' file, the single `attrgroup' will capture the command line flags used to build that file. Target-Dependent Attributes in IR --------------------------------- The front-end is responsible for knowing which target-dependent o...

...school and enterprises that have to cooperate in a net of mutual exchange and responsibility. The WHO (Worl Health Organizition) has individualized in the promotion of the health the winning strategy to cope with the actual epidemiological conditions, that see to prevail as cause of death and the degenerative chronic illnesses, the tumors, and with finally, the road accidents. During these last 30 years a lot of our habits are changed: more comforts! We have learned to eat more, as consequence of the great quantity of food and medicines! We have learned to prefer softer foods, that do not tire...

I'm looking for a way to set the \Seen flag on certain mail no matter what. Currently I'm using a global sieve script to do this. From what I've read, there is no way to enforce the global script if the user creates their own sieve script. More details: I have a postfix transport that along with sender_bcc_maps and recipient_bcc_maps uses deliver to create a read only archive of

...utes class. The target's back-end is responsible for interpreting >> target-dependent attributes. >> >> Attributes should be documented in the language reference document. > > Target specific attributes should probably be listed in the target-specific section of docs/CodeGenerator.rst. > Okay, that makes sense. >> The core of this proposal is the idea of an "attribute group". As the name >> implies, it's a group of attributes that are then referenced by objects within >> the IR. An attribute group is a module-level object. The BNF...

...attrgroup(#1) { ret void } > > An object may refer to more than one attribute group. In that situation, > the > attributes are merged. > > Attribute groups are important for keeping `.ll' files readable, because a > lot > of functions will use the same attributes. In the degenerative case of a > `.ll' > file that corresponds to a single `.c' file, the single `attrgroup' will > capture > the command line flags used to build that file. > > Target-Dependent Attributes in IR > --------------------------------- > > The front-end is respo...

...ret void } >> >> An object may refer to more than one attribute group. In that situation, the >> attributes are merged. >> >> Attribute groups are important for keeping `.ll' files readable, because a lot >> of functions will use the same attributes. In the degenerative case of a `.ll' >> file that corresponds to a single `.c' file, the single `attrgroup' will capture >> the command line flags used to build that file. > > A few comments on the new syntax: > > 1. I think most folks will understand what 'attrgroup...

Hi Please CC me as I'm not on the list! I have a share mounted to my linux box using smbmount, I can create and read files okay. The share is exported from a Win2K server. On the share I have a ext2 filesystem image which I am mounting with "mount -o loop". This all worked like a charm under linux 2.4 but after upgrading to 2.6.1 it has stopped working, the mount command just