search for: defuct

...ron (or for that matter, by hand) and when I 'rsync' a locally mounted samba filesystem (eg. to /mnt/smbfs), it successfully syncs the smbfs to the destination directory, but without reason hangs... and take all my cpu power... When i look at all the processes running, the rsync pid is defuct... and it's actually saying that the parent perl script that made the call is gobbling up all my cpu resources.... This ONLY happens (so far anyways) with the samba mounts... Any suggestions?? Thanks a bundle! -Chris

...really created standalone. e.g a function is added: f = Module.add_function(FTy, "foo") and the Function constructor is never used. That way having the policy "never use constructor" to create objects makes it consistent. Also this makes it consistent with the old defuct llvm-py bindings. (partially this also is a consequence of the fact that my bindings inherits from c_void_p making it a bit messier) * Directory layout Just minor thing. My bindings have python/bindings/lib/llvm /tests /tools I do like havin...

> > I don't necessarily mean the video - kernel panics are rarely to do > > with something that far removed from the CPU. I mean test the hardware > > of your computer. > > I'll do the testing suggested. The machine is rather old. > HP Compaq dc5800 sff (small form factor) > I would not be surprised if the kernel > just did not like my motherboard any

...e the number of named arguments is pretty overwhelming. I was probably going to create static methods for Module creation. Whether I was going to leave the named arguments on the constructor is an open issue. I don't think it matters too much. > Also this makes it consistent with the old defuct llvm-py bindings. > I'm not too concerned about this consistency. llvm-py began many years ago. Assumptions may be different now. I think we should do what makes sense today. If that is the same great. If not, oh well. > (partially this also is a consequence of the fact that my bindin...

On 3/17/2012 4:14 PM, Anders Waldenborg wrote: > FYI: > > I've also been working on new python bindings. > > My bindings are written using ctypes (just like the in-tree > clang/cindex bindings). Most of Core.h is bound, and stuff from > ExecutionEngine.h, Analysis, BitReader, BitWriter. The have fairly > good test coverage (using nosetests). The ctypes definitions are

At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:12:08 +0100, Christoph Grenz wrote: > > Hello, > > Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012, 21:15:02 schrieb Gregory Szorc: > > There was some talk on IRC last week about desire for Python bindings to > > LLVM's Object.h C interface. So, I coded up some and you can now find > > some Python bindings in trunk at bindings/python. Currently, the >