search for: defrho

...222 stack frames showing -- apparently in an > infinite recursion -- "as.character" shows up every 69 function calls: > > #64 0x080ea1ef in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x81c8b12 "as.character", obj=0x0, call=0x85a04f4, > args=0x8af8b00, rho=0x8af8b70, callrho=0x8af8b70, defrho=0x829d4c0, ans=0xbff042b8) > at objects.c:328 > > #133 0x080ea1ef in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x81c8b12 "as.character", obj=0x0, call=0x85a04f4, > args=0x8af35f0, rho=0x8af3660, callrho=0x8af3660, defrho=0x829d4c0, ans=0xbff08538) > at objects.c:328 > > #202 0x0...

...the stack, with 4222 stack frames showing -- apparently in an infinite recursion -- "as.character" shows up every 69 function calls: #64 0x080ea1ef in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x81c8b12 "as.character", obj=0x0, call=0x85a04f4, args=0x8af8b00, rho=0x8af8b70, callrho=0x8af8b70, defrho=0x829d4c0, ans=0xbff042b8) at objects.c:328 #133 0x080ea1ef in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x81c8b12 "as.character", obj=0x0, call=0x85a04f4, args=0x8af35f0, rho=0x8af3660, callrho=0x8af3660, defrho=0x829d4c0, ans=0xbff08538) at objects.c:328 #202 0x080ea1ef in Rf_usemethod (gene...

...the stack, with 4222 stack frames showing -- apparently in an infinite recursion -- "as.character" shows up every 69 function calls: #64 0x080ea1ef in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x81c8b12 "as.character", obj=0x0, call=0x85a04f4, args=0x8af8b00, rho=0x8af8b70, callrho=0x8af8b70, defrho=0x829d4c0, ans=0xbff042b8) at objects.c:328 #133 0x080ea1ef in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x81c8b12 "as.character", obj=0x0, call=0x85a04f4, args=0x8af35f0, rho=0x8af3660, callrho=0x8af3660, defrho=0x829d4c0, ans=0xbff08538) at objects.c:328 #202 0x080ea1ef in Rf_usemethod (gene...

..., name=0x81d19b8) at attrib.c:93 93 if (TAG(s) == name) { (gdb) backtrace #0 Rf_getAttrib (vec=0x8b50cd0, name=0x81d19b8) at attrib.c:93 #1 0x080c0a8f in Rf_usemethod (generic=0xbffff0c0 "print", obj=0x8b50cd0, call=0x880c5a0, args=0x81d1b08, rho=0x89dd900, callrho=0x81e6f68, defrho=0x81e6f14, ans=0xbffff0bc) at objects.c:271 #2 0x080c1058 in do_usemethod (call=0x880c5a0, op=0x81e4f80, args=0x880c5bc, env=0x89dd900) at objects.c:409 #3 0x0809cd29 in Rf_eval (e=0x880c5a0, rho=0x89dd900) at eval.c:404 #4 0x0809d26d in Rf_applyClosure (call=0x89de354, op=0x880c4c0,...

...0298, suppliedenv=0x1b2e99c8) at ../../../R/src/main/eval.c:667 #9 0x00000000004285b9 in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x67e8d7 "[", obj=<value optimized out>, call=<value optimized out>, args=<value optimized out>, rho=0xffffffffffffffff, callrho=0x1b690298, defrho=0x1a384f28, ans=0x7fffcaa8d5a8) at ../../../R/src/main/objects.c:311 #10 0x0000000000576a25 in Rf_DispatchOrEval (call=0x1a81d8d0, op=0x1a3622e8, generic=0x67e8d7 "[", args=0x1a81d908, rho=0x1b690298, ans=0x7fffcaa8d5a8, dropmissing=0, argsevald=0) at ../../../R/src/main/eval.c:...

..., name=0x81d19b8) at attrib.c:93 93 if (TAG(s) == name) { (gdb) backtrace #0 Rf_getAttrib (vec=0x8b50cd0, name=0x81d19b8) at attrib.c:93 #1 0x080c0a8f in Rf_usemethod (generic=0xbffff0c0 "print", obj=0x8b50cd0, call=0x880c5a0, args=0x81d1b08, rho=0x89dd900, callrho=0x81e6f68, defrho=0x81e6f14, ans=0xbffff0bc) at objects.c:271 #2 0x080c1058 in do_usemethod (call=0x880c5a0, op=0x81e4f80, args=0x880c5bc, env=0x89dd900) at objects.c:409 #3 0x0809cd29 in Rf_eval (e=0x880c5a0, rho=0x89dd900) at eval.c:404 #4 0x0809d26d in Rf_applyClosure (call=0x89de354, op=0x880c4c0,...

If anyone has a few extra CPU cycles to spare, I'd appreciate it if you could verify a problem that I have encountered. Run the code below and tell me if it crashes your R before completion. library(lme4) data(bdf) dump<-sapply( 1:50000, function(i) { fm <- lme(langPOST ~ IQ.ver.cen + avg.IQ.ver.cen, data = bdf, random = ~ IQ.ver.cen | schoolNR); cat("

...bd0) at eval.c:587 #19 0x0009a1a4 in applyMethod (call=0x86fc40, op=0x7d3f48, args=0x87015c, rho=0x8702ac, newrho=0x86fbd0) at objects.c:121 #20 0x0009a6f0 in Rf_usemethod (generic=0xffbed928 "plot", obj=0x9f61a8, call=0xffbed6a8, args=0x1bab20, rho=0x8702ac, callrho=0x1db408, defrho=0x1db3b4, ans=0xffbed924) at objects.c:340 #21 0x0009ac00 in do_usemethod (call=0x7d12f4, op=0x1d93c8, args=0x7d1310, env=0x8702ac) at objects.c:409 #22 0x00072444 in Rf_eval (e=0x7d12f4, rho=0x8702ac) at eval.c:404 #23 0x00072444 in Rf_eval (e=0x7d1284, rho=0x8702ac) at eval.c:404 #24 0x000735...

...eval.c:669 #17 0xb7d60a32 in applyMethod (call=0x89b1c9c, op=0x89b1ba0, args=0x89b1e24, rho=0x89b1d7c, newrho=0x89b1cd4) at objects.c:126 #18 0xb7d61223 in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x8069af8 "edit", obj=0x8a87868, call=0x89b1e94, args=0x8052110, rho=0x89b1d7c, callrho=0x8073f9c, defrho=0x828f2fc, ans=0xbfd10d00) at objects.c:291 #19 0xb7d61776 in do_usemethod (call=0x89b1e94, op=0x80711b8, args=0x89b1e78, env=0x89b1d7c) at objects.c:399 #20 0xb7d1f352 in Rf_eval (e=0x89b1e94, rho=0x89b1d7c) at eval.c:463 #21 0xb7d1fb67 in Rf_applyClosure (call=0x89b2230, op=0x89b2150, arg...

...xb7d60a32 in applyMethod (call=0x89b1c9c, op=0x89b1ba0, args=0x89b1e24, > rho=0x89b1d7c, newrho=0x89b1cd4) at objects.c:126 > #18 0xb7d61223 in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x8069af8 "edit", obj=0x8a87868, > call=0x89b1e94, args=0x8052110, rho=0x89b1d7c, callrho=0x8073f9c, > defrho=0x828f2fc, ans=0xbfd10d00) at objects.c:291 > #19 0xb7d61776 in do_usemethod (call=0x89b1e94, op=0x80711b8, args=0x89b1e78, > env=0x89b1d7c) at objects.c:399 > #20 0xb7d1f352 in Rf_eval (e=0x89b1e94, rho=0x89b1d7c) at eval.c:463 > #21 0xb7d1fb67 in Rf_applyClosure (call=0x89b2230, op...

...24) at eval.c:558 #23 0x000ac484 in applyMethod (call=0xec945c, op=0x8d7004, args=0xeca770, rho=0xeca968, newrho=0xec9424) at objects.c:119 #24 0x000acad8 in Rf_usemethod (generic=0x8cf918 "plot", obj=0x8d7004, call=0xffbee300, args=0xec9424, rho=0xeca968, callrho=0x227480, defrho=0x229388, ans=0xffbee57c) at objects.c:326 #25 0x000acf7c in do_usemethod (call=0x8d3bd8, op=0x2251a8, args=0x8d3bf4, env=0xeca968) at objects.c:389 #26 0x0007d6cc in Rf_eval (e=0x8d3bd8, rho=0xeca968) at eval.c:375 #27 0x0007d6cc in Rf_eval (e=0x8d3b68, rho=0xeca968) at eval.c:375 #28 0x0007e...

Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are: 1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula? 2. Why does the

Dear all, I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step by step. When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have "segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time. My questions are: 1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula? 2. Why does the