search for: defraging

Two files in the different subvolumes may have the same inode id, so The rb-tree which is used to manage the defragment object must take it into account. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c

While exploring some btrfs maintenance with respect to defragmenting I ran the following commands: # filefrag /path/to/34G.file /path/to/5.7G.file /path/to/34G.file: 2406 extents found /path/to/5.7G.file: 572 extents found Thinking those mostly static files could be less fragmented I ran: # btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/34G.file # btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/5.7G.file and

...unted file systems, neither can it guarantee data integrity. For that case, I mean, when the machine is booted into repair mode and file system is not in use, We can use gtar to save|restore data without data loss, so the commercial tool can not do almost no help for us. Anyone have any ideas on defraging ext3 file systems on-line? Thanks a lot. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following is the defragment reported by e2fsck.. arc158.example.com guolin 135% sudo e2fsck -f -n -d...

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 03:30 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I use btrfs on most of my volumes on my laptop, and I''ve always felt >> booting was very slow, but definitely sure is slow, is starting up >> Google Chrome: >> >> encrypted ext4: ~20s >> btrfs: ~2:11s

Kernel 3.1-rc8 btrfs-progs-0.19 mount options: noatime,autodefrag (space_cache is enabled) There are snapshots present on the filesystem. When I do a btrfs fi defrag on a file, the file becomes much more fragmented. The end result can be a file with 20k times more fragments than before. Initially I thought the extents were just smaller but were next to each other, so I checked with both

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:12:58PM +0100, Olivier Hault wrote: > For a while, I wonder if it would be possible to defrag guest fs > from the host. I can see two flavors a) offline defrag, b) online > defrag of the guest fs > > I there already solutions of works in progress to support those > operations ? We don't support this right now. However it is certainly something we

Hi, first of all, apologies if this isn't the right mailing list but it was the best I could find. If you know a better mailing list, please tell me. Today I tried to defrag one of my filesystems. It's a 3.5T large filesystem that has 6 software-raids in the bottom and then merged together using lvm. I was running ext3 but removed the journal flag with thor:~# tune2fs -O ^has_journal

The patch titled Subject: ocfs2: fix non-auto defrag path not working issue has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch This patch

Hey folks, Does anybody know if any of these are on the roadmap for ZFS, or have any idea how long it''s likely to be before we see them (we''re in no rush - late 2008 would be fine with us, but it would be nice to know they''re being worked on)? I''ve seen many people ask for the ability to expand a raid-z pool by adding devices. I''m wondering if it

Hello everybody, reading about the speed improvements possible with (on boot) preloaded files (which should be continuous on disk) I searched for a ext3 defrag program. I found an ext2 defrag program (http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/system/filesystems/defrag-0.70.tar.gz, available in debian as defrag) which would have an optimal feature (moving files by a list) but refuses to work on ext3.

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix non-auto defrag path not working issue to the 6.2-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.2 subdirectory.

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix non-auto defrag path not working issue to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix non-auto defrag path not working issue to the 5.15-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.15

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix non-auto defrag path not working issue to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix non-auto defrag path not working issue to the 4.19-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.19

The quilt patch titled Subject: ocfs2: fix non-auto defrag path not working issue has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ocfs2-fix-non-auto-defrag-path-not-working-issue.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm ------------------------------------------------------ From:

- Add incompat flag, otherwise btrfs-progs will report error when operating on btrfs filesystems mounted with lzo option. - Allow to turn on lzo compression for defrag operation: # btrfs filesystem defragment -c[zlib, lzo] <file> Note: "-c zlib" will fail, because that''s how getopt() works for optional arguments. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan

I set the C (NOCOW) and z (Not_Compressed) flags on a folder but the extent counts of files contained there keep increasing. Said files are large and frequently modified but not changing in size. This does not happen when the filesystem is mounted with nodatacow. I''m using this as a workaround since subvolumes can''t be mounted with different options simultaneously. ie. one with

This fixes three issues on move extents ioctl without auto defrag: a) In ocfs2_find_victim_alloc_group(), we have to convert bits to block first in case of global bitmap. b) In ocfs2_probe_alloc_group(), when finding enough bits in block group bitmap, we have to back off move_len to start pos as well, otherwise it may corrupt filesystem. c) In ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents(), set me_threshold both for

The patch titled Subject: ocfs2: fix defrag path triggering jbd2 ASSERT has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is ocfs2-fix-defrag-path-triggering-jbd2-assert.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ocfs2-fix-defrag-path-triggering-jbd2-assert.patch This patch will later