Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "defjsqen".
2016 Apr 18
2
Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
...EH/01QLHrK59zUEiOuBCpDIXtX
1R6NwHp+9wDait8fx1nCydtZN+FSaXLeiOZC1JG+cT8ItOOj5c5iD6pIxp2FJkg1
psBl/Ym6MMJkhTH3ZlRdy6+jsJANy04lfQz4mdkcYqMI6x9++pfoCHLEajatZlPm
Aq9CbUtvxvb8Vu3vnhdYbS5JvqTN2InIoGh62BJRuPVApMMkQgS1eQOfBnBk34dT
4zJT2t9afMHlr29s5gqWa8jh/LAx7BuNJu64m6k4wraku9sIqb4WlGDCK9Chq3zQ
5zbEHviYRF6N+DEfjsqEN+xxbrvanjEG140TXxmnplNdbLORFL7KsJg4P/U49js=
=hGM4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2016 Apr 18
2
Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 18/04/16 13:34, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> Unfortunately, I have neither the time, nor expertise to partake in
> such a project.
is there someone else on here who can help ? I think if we can
demonstrate some traction, it would go a long way in both the upstream
engagement and the conversation with Red Hat - since we can then
demonstrate a