search for: definitons

I could not find anything in the mailing list archive or bug tracker. In ssh2.h, the value (4) is re-used 148 #define SSH2_DISCONNECT_KEY_EXCHANGE_FAILED 3 149 #define SSH2_DISCONNECT_HOST_AUTHENTICATION_FAILED 4 150 #define SSH2_DISCONNECT_RESERVED 4 151 #define SSH2_DISCONNECT_MAC_ERROR 5 Is this intentional? Thanks, Noah Zalev

...ws > us to use the OpenSSL-1.1 API when using OpenSSL-1.0, so we don't have > to maintain a forest of #ifdefs. For obvious reasons this shim cannot exist. If the structure member is not visible anymore (and might not actually look the way you think it does), you cannot provide structure definitons that magically give you access to the members again. Also, you do not need to maintain a forest of #ifdef - as soon as you switch the code to only use accessor functions, the only #ifdef you have is "one for the whole shim" or possibly "one per compat accessor function" - nicel...

> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 at 5:55 AM > From: "David Winsemius" <dwinsemius at comcast.net> > > > Not correct. You already have `predict`. It is capale of using the `newdata` values to do interpolation with the values of the coefficients in the model. See: > > ?predict > The ? details did not mention interpolation explicity; thanks. > The

Hello, I am developing an LTO instrumentation of programs for fuzzing (for afl++) and I run into the following problem: a lot of open source program have multiple definitons of the same functions. In normal compile mode this is not a problem, however with LTO this only works with the linker option: -Wl,--allow-multiple-definition Now to be able to instrument (it is an "opt" pass") at link time I need to merge all bitcode files together, and this works...

Hello, what are they meaning? It could be something that would show a threshhold above which the result is indicating different meanings then just random noise. But there is no description on the definition of those lines, so it means nothing, if it is not clearly defined. Where can I find a detailed definiton? Ciao, Oliver

> On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:00 PM, g l <gnulinux at gmx.com> wrote: > >> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 at 4:40 PM >> From: "Jeff Newmiller" <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> >> >> the coef function. >> > > For the benefit of other novices, used the following command to read the documentation: > > ?coef > > Then tried and

At the risk of stating the obvious but 2.2.3a is rather old - try updating to the latest stable 2.2.x series of Samba. After that you might want to look into the options relating to "Oplocks" >>I am wondering if anybody has expected the same problem before? The only idea i have is that this error occures because i have a lot of file and directory, chown, chmod directives in my

Leaving the body of the method the same as the default still throws the "stack level too deep" error. As a matter of fact, it only disappears if I comment out the ''require'' in line 1. As it turned out, it was the method definiton itself that caused problems. Ruby doesn''t have keyword arguments, but I tried calling the method as if it had. But when I changed

> On Apr 6, 2018, at 3:43 AM, g l <gnulinux at gmx.com> wrote: > >> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 at 5:55 AM >> From: "David Winsemius" <dwinsemius at comcast.net> >> >> >> Not correct. You already have `predict`. It is capale of using the `newdata` values to do interpolation with the values of the coefficients in the model. See:

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Klaus Hartnegg <hartnegg at uni-freiburg.de> wrote: > Not sure which email you mean. I don't think that this can happen. If the > Linux acls are modified, the Windows ACLs are destroyed and all is based on > the Linux permissions and acls (which looks strange when viewed from > Window). If the Windows ACLs are modified, Samba automatically

> On Apr 6, 2018, at 8:03 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > >> On Apr 6, 2018, at 3:43 AM, g l <gnulinux at gmx.com> wrote: >> >>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018 at 5:55 AM >>> From: "David Winsemius" <dwinsemius at comcast.net> >>> >>> >>> Not correct. You already have

Hi all, first i want to say a big "Hello" to the list, since this is my first posting here. Yesterday i just installed another SAMBA server on a middle class (K6-2 500, 128MB) machine. All shares are accessable like expected but i often get an "Can't move file. File in use." error from my W2K client when moving large amount of files to the SAMBA server. This error

> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 at 4:40 PM > From: "Jeff Newmiller" <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> > > the coef function. > For the benefit of other novices, used the following command to read the documentation: ?coef Then tried and obtained: > cvalue100<-coef(graphmodelp~100) > cvalue100 NULL Then looked at the model values which of course correspond

?Random.user says (in svn trunk) Optionally, functions \code{user_unif_nseed} and \code{user_unif_seedloc} can be supplied which are called with no arguments and should return pointers to the number of seeds and to an integer array of seeds. Calls to \code{GetRNGstate} and \code{PutRNGstate} will then copy this array to and from \code{.Random.seed}. And it offers as an example void

...t; Subject: [EXT] [llvm-dev] llvm-link has no --allow-multiple-definition >> >> Hello, >> >> I am developing an LTO instrumentation of programs for fuzzing (for >> afl++) and I run into the following problem: >> >> a lot of open source program have multiple definitons of the same >> functions. In normal compile mode this is not a problem, however with >> LTO this only works with the linker option: >> -Wl,--allow-multiple-definition >> >> Now to be able to instrument (it is an "opt" pass") at link time I need >>...

Hello list, I want to make a large rulebased algorithm, to provide decision support for drug prescriptions. I have defined the algorithm in a function, with a for loop and many if statements. The structure should be as follows: 1. Iterate over a list of drug names. For each drug: 2. Get some drug related data (external dataset). Row of a dataframe. 3. Check if adaptions should be made to

Hi. I''ve defined a virtual user "kenneth", and depending on a variable in the node definiton I''d like to add the users to different groups. Consider this example: ###### Code start node "server.example.com" { $server_type = "typeA" realize User[kenneth] } @user {"kenneth": ensure => present, uid => 1000,

happy new year. a day off is a day to pick up a new project, so I wrestled my way through making ogg vorbis work on macosx. first, libao (not entirely a proper patch, but 2 source file diffs and a diff of a configure'd Makefile to one that works.): http://bolson.org/pub/libao-0.8.2-diff.tar.gz libogg and libvorbis compiled without incident. vorbis-tools were more complicated. I think

happy new year. a day off is a day to pick up a new project, so I wrestled my way through making ogg vorbis work on macosx. first, libao (not entirely a proper patch, but 2 source file diffs and a diff of a configure'd Makefile to one that works.): http://bolson.org/pub/libao-0.8.2-diff.tar.gz libogg and libvorbis compiled without incident. vorbis-tools were more complicated. I think

Am 15.05.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Reindl Harald: > the real problem in that thread is that the ordinary chmod/chown > permissions are called repeatly "acls" which is not wrong by the > definiton of "access control list" but mixing that with "windows ACLs" > and "posix ACLs" where on the FS layer we just have ACLs set with > "setfacl" it