search for: definiton

I could not find anything in the mailing list archive or bug tracker. In ssh2.h, the value (4) is re-used 148 #define SSH2_DISCONNECT_KEY_EXCHANGE_FAILED 3 149 #define SSH2_DISCONNECT_HOST_AUTHENTICATION_FAILED 4 150 #define SSH2_DISCONNECT_RESERVED 4 151 #define SSH2_DISCONNECT_MAC_ERROR 5 Is this intentional? Thanks, Noah Zalev

...ws > us to use the OpenSSL-1.1 API when using OpenSSL-1.0, so we don't have > to maintain a forest of #ifdefs. For obvious reasons this shim cannot exist. If the structure member is not visible anymore (and might not actually look the way you think it does), you cannot provide structure definitons that magically give you access to the members again. Also, you do not need to maintain a forest of #ifdef - as soon as you switch the code to only use accessor functions, the only #ifdef you have is "one for the whole shim" or possibly "one per compat accessor function" - nice...

...tion with the values of the coefficients in the model. See: > > ?predict > The ? details did not mention interpolation explicity; thanks. > The original question asked for a derivative (i.e. a "gradient"), but so far it's not clear that you understand the mathematical definiton of that term. We also remain unclear whether this is homework. > The motivation of this post was simple differentiation of a tangent point (dy/dx) manually, then wondering how to re-think in modern-day computing terms. Hence the original question about asking the appropriate functions/syntax t...

Hello, I am developing an LTO instrumentation of programs for fuzzing (for afl++) and I run into the following problem: a lot of open source program have multiple definitons of the same functions. In normal compile mode this is not a problem, however with LTO this only works with the linker option: -Wl,--allow-multiple-definition Now to be able to instrument (it is an "opt" pass") at link time I need to merge all bitcode files together, and this works...

...o, what are they meaning? It could be something that would show a threshhold above which the result is indicating different meanings then just random noise. But there is no description on the definition of those lines, so it means nothing, if it is not clearly defined. Where can I find a detailed definiton? Ciao, Oliver

...ou already have `predict`. It is capale of using the `newdata` values to do interpolation with the values of the coefficients in the model. See: ?predict The original question asked for a derivative (i.e. a "gradient"), but so far it's not clear that you understand the mathematical definiton of that term. We also remain unclear whether this is homework. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-p...

...ries of Samba. After that you might want to look into the options relating to "Oplocks" >>I am wondering if anybody has expected the same problem before? The only idea i have is that this error occures because i have a lot of file and directory, chown, chmod directives in my share definiton and that maybe the machine is too slow to workup all the requests. But the thing that speaks against that is that the total CPU usage normally doesnt go higher than 40%. In my experience Samba deals very well with seriously high loads even on reasonably modest hardware. I have a dual PIII 600 wit...

Leaving the body of the method the same as the default still throws the "stack level too deep" error. As a matter of fact, it only disappears if I comment out the ''require'' in line 1. As it turned out, it was the method definiton itself that caused problems. Ruby doesn''t have keyword arguments, but I tried calling the method as if it had. But when I changed the definiton to one with a hash that simulates keywords, it works just fine: --- module ActionView module Helpers module ActiveRecordHelper def er...

...fficients in the model. See: >> >> ?predict >> > > The ? details did not mention interpolation explicity; thanks. > >> The original question asked for a derivative (i.e. a "gradient"), but so far it's not clear that you understand the mathematical definiton of that term. We also remain unclear whether this is homework. >> > > The motivation of this post was simple differentiation of a tangent point (dy/dx) manually, then wondering how to re-think in modern-day computing terms. Hence the original question about asking the appropriate func...

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Klaus Hartnegg <hartnegg at uni-freiburg.de> wrote: > Not sure which email you mean. I don't think that this can happen. If the > Linux acls are modified, the Windows ACLs are destroyed and all is based on > the Linux permissions and acls (which looks strange when viewed from > Window). If the Windows ACLs are modified, Samba automatically

...>>> >>> ?predict >>> >> >> The ? details did not mention interpolation explicity; thanks. >> >>> The original question asked for a derivative (i.e. a "gradient"), but so far it's not clear that you understand the mathematical definiton of that term. We also remain unclear whether this is homework. >>> >> >> The motivation of this post was simple differentiation of a tangent point (dy/dx) manually, then wondering how to re-think in modern-day computing terms. Hence the original question about asking the appr...

...ersion is 2.2.3a. The host system is debian with kernel 2.4.20. The shares are laying on XFS filesystems. I am wondering if anybody has expected the same problem before? The only idea i have is that this error occures because i have a lot of file and directory, chown, chmod directives in my share definiton and that maybe the machine is too slow to workup all the requests. But the thing that speaks against that is that the total CPU usage normally doesnt go higher than 40%. Heres a share defintion example from my smb.conf. #< Share for FTP Data################################################...

> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 at 4:40 PM > From: "Jeff Newmiller" <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> > > the coef function. > For the benefit of other novices, used the following command to read the documentation: ?coef Then tried and obtained: > cvalue100<-coef(graphmodelp~100) > cvalue100 NULL Then looked at the model values which of course correspond

...o leave int as 32 bit, it doesn't seem wise to assume that is always the case. I got into this because I'm trying to extend the rsprng code; sprng returns its state as a vector of bytes. Converting these to a vector of integers depends on the integer length, hence my interest in the exact definiton of integer. I'm interested in lifetime because I believe those bytes are associated with the stream and become invalid when the stream is freed; furthermore, I probably need to copy them into a buffer that is padded to full wordlength. This means I allocate the buffer whose address is returne...

...t; Subject: [EXT] [llvm-dev] llvm-link has no --allow-multiple-definition >> >> Hello, >> >> I am developing an LTO instrumentation of programs for fuzzing (for >> afl++) and I run into the following problem: >> >> a lot of open source program have multiple definitons of the same >> functions. In normal compile mode this is not a problem, however with >> LTO this only works with the linker option: >> -Wl,--allow-multiple-definition >> >> Now to be able to instrument (it is an "opt" pass") at link time I need >&gt...

...formation in some lists and continue to the next drug. 5. When the iteration over all drugs is done, return the lists. ISSUE: So it is a very large function with many nested if statements. I have checked the code structure multiple times, but i run into some issues. When i try to run the function definiton, the command never "completes" in de console. Instead of ">", the console shows "+". No errors are raised. As I said, i have checked the structure multiple times, but cant find an error. I have tried rebuilding it and testing each time i add a part. Each part funct...

Hi. I''ve defined a virtual user "kenneth", and depending on a variable in the node definiton I''d like to add the users to different groups. Consider this example: ###### Code start node "server.example.com" { $server_type = "typeA" realize User[kenneth] } @user {"kenneth": ensure => present, uid => 1000, gid => 1000,...

...nsports[] = { &file_transport, NULL }; +#else extern transport_t http_transport; transport_t *transports[] = { &http_transport, &file_transport, NULL }; - +#endif transport_t *get_transport_by_name (char *name) { ogg123/Makefile needs to not use "-lm", it contains a definiton of getopt which collides with one included in share/libgetopt.a, I don't know how to make autoconf/configure do this though. On top of that obfuscation is the libtool script, in one place it discards a "-framework ___" that I need; in another place it adds a "-lm" I don&...

...nsports[] = { &file_transport, NULL }; +#else extern transport_t http_transport; transport_t *transports[] = { &http_transport, &file_transport, NULL }; - +#endif transport_t *get_transport_by_name (char *name) { ogg123/Makefile needs to not use "-lm", it contains a definiton of getopt which collides with one included in share/libgetopt.a, I don't know how to make autoconf/configure do this though. On top of that obfuscation is the libtool script, in one place it discards a "-framework ___" that I need; in another place it adds a "-lm" I don&...

Am 15.05.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Reindl Harald: > the real problem in that thread is that the ordinary chmod/chown > permissions are called repeatly "acls" which is not wrong by the > definiton of "access control list" but mixing that with "windows ACLs" > and "posix ACLs" where on the FS layer we just have ACLs set with > "setfacl" it leads to total confusion and nobody knows what people are > talking about Let's use the term access r...