Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "define_transparent_operand_accessor".
Did you mean:
define_transparent_operand_accessors
2008 Apr 29
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] use-diet for review
...::op_end(this) -
GEPI.getNumOperands(),
+ GEPI.getNumOperands()) {
+ Use *OL = OperandList;
+ Use *GEPIOL = GEPI.OperandList;
+ for (unsigned i = 0, E = NumOperands; i != E; ++i)
+ OL[i].init(GEPIOL[i], this);
+}
Please just move methods like this out of line when possible.
+DEFINE_TRANSPARENT_OPERAND_ACCESSORS(CallInst, Value)
+//void CallInst::operator delete(void *it) {
+// OperandTraits<CallInst>::op_begin(static_cast<CallInst*>(it));
+//}
+
Please remove the commented out code.
+++ include/llvm/User.h (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -23,15 +23,203 @@
+/
*=
=
=
=
=
=
===========================...
2008 Apr 29
5
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] use-diet for review
Hi all,
I have reported more than enough about the space savings achieved
and the associated costs, here comes the current patch for review.
Since this one is substantially smaller than the previous one, I did
not cut it in pieces. The front part is about headers and the rest
the .cpp and other files.
Cheers,
Gabor
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified