Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "defens".
Did you mean:
defense
2009 Sep 27
5
[LLVMdev] A basicblock iterator bug in llvm
...call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias
getelementptr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32>
[#uses=0]
IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias
getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32>
[#uses=0]
opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173:
llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>&
llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy =
llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off
the beginning of an ilist!"' failed.
0 opt...
2009 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] A basicblock iterator bug in llvm
...tr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32>
> [#uses=0]
> IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias
> getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32>
> [#uses=0]
> opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173:
> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>&
> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy =
> llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off
> the beginning of an ilist!"' fail...
2009 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] A basicblock iterator bug in llvm
...tr ([40 x i8]* @.str2, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32>
> [#uses=0]
> IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias
> getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ; <i32>
> [#uses=0]
> opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173:
> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>&
> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy =
> llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off
> the beginning of an ilist!"' fail...
2009 Sep 27
1
[LLVMdev] A basicblock iterator bug in llvm
...nd
>> ; <i32>
>> [#uses=0]
>> IsFirst First Inst: %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias
>> getelementptr ([42 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind
>> ; <i32>
>> [#uses=0]
>> opt: /home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:173:
>> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>&
>> llvm::ilist_iterator<NodeTy>::operator--() [with NodeTy =
>> llvm::Instruction]: Assertion `Traits::getNext(NodePtr) && "--'d off
>> the beginning of an ilist!...
2009 Jun 28
3
[LLVMdev] Error when running llc to compile .bc to .s
..., and
x=1,2,3. I use the version in svn to compile an httpd.bc file
succefully with dbgstoppoint() functions. However, when I use llc to
compile the bc file to .s file (llc -f -o httpd.s httpd.bc), I met
this error (the httpd.bc file will be attached at the next email):
llc:
/home/heming/defens/llvm-2.5/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp:1235: void
llvm::DwarfDebug::ConstructCompileUnit(llvm::GlobalVariable*):
Assertion `!MainCU && "Multiple main compile units are found!"' failed.
0 llc 0x00000000011c0f6c
1 llc 0x00000000011c148a
2...
2002 Jun 27
2
openssh-3.4p1-1.src.rpm & RH 6.2
When trying to compile openssh3.4 to Redhat 6.2 I get following error:
#rpm --rebuild openssh-3.4p1-1.src.rpm
Installing openssh-3.4p1-1.src.rpm
error: failed build dependencies:
db1-devel is needed by openssh-3.4p1-1
Please advice about the recommend way to proceed. There is no (official)
db1 rpm package for RH6.2.
I did not have any db1 dependency problems with previous versions of
2009 Jun 27
0
[LLVMdev] Patch for llvm::DepthFirstIterator.h and llvm::PostOrderIterator.h
Hi Olaf,
This patch looks good to me. I just have a few minor comments:
> + inline df_iterator() { CurrentTopNode = 0; /* End is when stack
is empty */ }
Should the comment here be updated to say that the End
is reached when the stack is empty and when CurrentTopNode
is null?
> + inline void toNext()
> + {
LLVM style puts the open brace on the same line as the function name.
2009 Jun 26
3
[LLVMdev] Patch for llvm::DepthFirstIterator.h and llvm::PostOrderIterator.h
Hi @clang and @llvm,
attached you'll find a patch dealing with some iterator issues I already
mentioned in both lists. Since there was no reaction I cross-post again
- now IMHO production-ready code.
The patch is considered to get checked-in out of the box. It should not
affect the behavior of existing and working code. I really need it for
clang AST processing.
Changes:
1. Both