search for: defautlipsitelink

Hi all, Using 4.3.4 + Bind DLZ @ Centos 7. Regarding AD sites, I have several questions: 1° Is it possible with Samba4 to rename Default-First-Site-Name? 2° samba-tool sites create <name> does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, is it the correct behaviour? 3° When a DC is not in Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS records related to that DC should exists in Default-First-Site-Name related DNS records. Is that true? ex: _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.samba.domain.tld should not exist. 4° When a DC is moved from o...

...the right one, perhaps that patch would have broken part of this packaged samba... Of course the issue can come from me, but as I used RSAT to rename the site, I can't see how I could do a mistake... > > >> 2° samba-tool sites create <name> >> does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, is it the correct behaviour? >> > > Probably not. > OK > > 3° When a DC is not in Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS records related to >> that DC should exists in Default-First-Site-Name related DNS records. Is >> that true? >> ex: _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Si...

...en part of this packaged samba... >> Of course the issue can come from me, but as I used RSAT to rename the >> site, I can't see how I could do a mistake... >> >> >> >> 2° samba-tool sites create <name> >> does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, is it the correct >> behaviour? >> >> >> Probably not. >> >> >> OK >> >> >> 3° When a DC is not in Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS records >> related to >> that DC should exists in Default-F...

.... >> Of course the issue can come from me, but as I used RSAT to >> rename the site, I can't see how I could do a mistake... >> >> >> >> 2° samba-tool sites create <name> >> does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, is it the >> correct >> behaviour? >> >> >> Probably not. >> >> >> OK >> >> >> 3° When a DC is not in Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS >> records >>...

...infractory at gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > Using 4.3.4 + Bind DLZ @ Centos 7. > > Regarding AD sites, I have several questions: > > 1° Is it possible with Samba4 to rename Default-First-Site-Name? > > 2° samba-tool sites create <name> > does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, is it the correct behaviour? > > 3° When a DC is not in Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS records related to > that DC should exists in Default-First-Site-Name related DNS records. Is > that true? > ex: _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.samba.domain.tld should not > exist....

...ns: > > 1° Is it possible with Samba4 to rename Default-First-Site-Name? Depends on what you mean, if you mean can it be changed, then the answer is yes. If you mean can it be changed with samba-tool, then no. > > 2° samba-tool sites create <name> > does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, is it the correct behaviour? Probably not. > 3° When a DC is not in Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS records related to > that DC should exists in Default-First-Site-Name related DNS records. Is > that true? > ex: _ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.samba.domain.tld should not &...

...patch would have broken part of this packaged > samba... > Of course the issue can come from me, but as I used RSAT to rename the > site, I can't see how I could do a mistake... > > > > 2° samba-tool sites create <name> > does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, is it the correct > behaviour? > > > Probably not. > > > OK > > > 3° When a DC is not in Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS records > related to > that DC should exists in Default-First-Site-Name related DNS > records....

...art of this packaged samba... > Of course the issue can come from me, but as I used RSAT to > rename the site, I can't see how I could do a mistake... > > > > 2° samba-tool sites create <name> > does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, is it the > correct > behaviour? > > > Probably not. > > > OK > > > 3° When a DC is not in Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS > records > related to > that DC...

...Of course the issue can come from me, but as I used > RSAT to > rename the site, I can't see how I could do a mistake... > > > > 2° samba-tool sites create <name> > does not link new site to DEFAUTLIPSITELINK, > is it the > correct > behaviour? > > > Probably not. > > > OK > > > 3° When a DC is not in > Default-First-Site-Name, no DNS >...