Displaying 20 results from an estimated 85 matches for "defattrs".
Did you mean:
defattr
2009 Jul 28
1
[PATCH ovirt-node] Removed subpackages, stateful, stateless, logos, and selinux for inclusuion in Fedora
rhbz#:51422
---
ovirt-node.spec.in | 149 +++++++++------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ovirt-node.spec.in b/ovirt-node.spec.in
index 3138011..b4e660d 100644
--- a/ovirt-node.spec.in
+++ b/ovirt-node.spec.in
@@ -43,76 +43,23 @@ Requires: nc
Requires: grub
Requires: /usr/sbin/crond
Requires: anyterm
2012 Jan 22
1
Packaging GObject for Fedora (was: [rjones@fedoraproject.org: New upstream version 1.15.19.])
These are the changes I made to the spec file related to gobject
bindings and gobject introspection. TBH I wasn't sure how to properly
package this.
Rich.
diff --git a/libguestfs.spec b/libguestfs.spec
index 095a848..1b6e43d 100644
--- a/libguestfs.spec
+++ b/libguestfs.spec
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
Summary: Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Name: libguestfs
Epoch:
2014 Jan 03
1
Need help with spec file for Apache-2.4.7
I am trying to build an RPM for Apache-2.4.7-1 on Centos-6.5-i86_64. I am
using mock.
The are three build dependencies that I am trying to resolve. One,
mod_socache_dc / distcache, I have simply removed from the spec file. The
other two are arp and apr-utils. Since httpd-2.4.7 needs arp >= 1.4 I got the
two latter requirements from
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.4.7-deps.tar.bz2
2015 Mar 18
2
Need help for write rpm spec
Hi
I am try to write rpm spec for install tomcat on a linux machine.But while
build the rpm i found following error
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id
/home/rpmbuild/BUILD/Install_tomcat-1.0
extracting debug info from
/home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/Install_tomcat-1.0-1.el6.x86_64/usr/local/jdk1.7.0_13/lib/visualvm/profiler/lib/deployed/jdk16/linux-amd64/libprofilerinterface.so
***
2001 Feb 28
1
patches to beta 4 spec files
Hi,
Attached are patches for the beta 4 distribution, fixing minor
problems in RPM spec files.
One question: are there any reasons not to include vorbiscomment
in the vorbis-tools binary package? I've added the long-awaited
utility program into the revised spec file, but I wonder if it
is a wrong change...
Regards,
--
KAJIYAMA, Tamito <kajiyama@grad.sccs.chukyo-u.ac.jp>
diff -ru
2000 Sep 03
1
installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2
I am taking the liberty of forwarding this message to the list. I am
not subscribed to it. If you want to reply to me, please send email to
faheem at email.unc.edu
Thanks, Faheem Mitha.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh
Subject: installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2
Dear people,
I tried
2011 Aug 12
0
Wrong directory permissions in RPMs build on CentOS6
Hi,
I have rebuilt all our source RPMs on CentOS 6 and found they sometimes
differ in directory permissions compared to those built on CentOS 3, 4 and
5.
The problem is that %defattr overrides %attr on directories. Have a look
at this example spec file:
--%<---------------------------------
Summary: foo
Name: mini
Version: 0.1
Release: 1%{?dist}
Group: System Environment/Daemons
License:
2008 Apr 08
3
Ruby RRDtool bindings and CentOS 5
For whatever reason, the RPMForge package ruby-rrdtool doesn''t play
nice on my CentOS 5.1 box with puppetmaster. It installs
site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/RRD.so, which puppetmaster is unable to find
(and the suggested test of ruby -rRRDtool -e ''puts :yep'' fails).
Using ln to link RRD.so to RRDtool.so works for the command line test,
but still fails for puppetmaster. This
2006 May 10
2
A minor patch to spec file
Hello,
in order to compile sppex on my Fedora, I had to do the following
changes. Please consider installing them to the main tree.
Thanks for your work,
Stepan Kasal
--- /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/Speex.spec 2006-02-15 13:13:48.000000000 +0100
+++ /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/Speex.spec.new 2006-05-10 11:00:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name: %name
Version: %ver
Release: %rel
-Copyright: BSD
2004 Sep 10
1
Problems with FLAC make
Hi,
I have been making an RPM of FLAC to bundle with GStreamer. In order to
get it working I had to make some rather hackish solutions in the SPEC
file. The flac Makefile does to build into the correct directories while
creating an RPM for some reason. I have attached the SPEC file I ended
up with if it is of interest. Of course it didn't help me much cause it
turned up we had a bug in the
2009 Jul 10
2
[PATCH: node 0/3] replace ovirt-identify-node with matahari
This patchset removes ovirt-identify-node and ovirt-listen awake.
It adds startup script support for the matahari qmf agent, which takes
over the responsibility for communicating node hardware capabilities
to the ovirt-server.
On the server side, host-browser has had its node identification
functionality replaced by a new script, host-register, which is what
interfaces with the matahari qmf agent
2017 May 11
2
R 3.4.0 RPMS
Dear Tom,
I see that RPMS for R 3.4.0 are not successfully built on Fedora, nor
on RHEL 7.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1230
When I build with mock on Fedora 25 I also get a build failure. R is
not able to establish the time zone inside the chroot and this triggers
a regression tests which is new in R 3.4.0. Specifically, in file
tests/reg-tests-1d.R this test
2009 Jul 08
1
[PATCH: ovirt-identify-node replacement 0/4] ovirt node patch to replace ovirt-identify-node with matahari qmf agent
The purpose of this patch is to add support for the matahari qmf agent
package (http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=matahari.git;a=summary) to the node.
The following actions are taken:
1. Deprecate ovirt-identify-node and ovirt-listen-awake by removing
them from the autotools scripts, the rpm spec and the node startup scripts.
2. Remove ovirt-listen-awake and ovirt-identify-node completely.
3. Add
2002 May 06
2
patch: contrib/redhat/openssh.spec updates for privsep
Hello!
Now that PrivSep stuff works for PAM too, I took the time to update
contrib/redhat/openssh.spec to create the sshd user and set up the
/var/empty dir when installing the packages.
These have been done the Red Hat style, the uid/gif 74 is currently free
in RHL.
The only minor issues I could think of were:
- I'm not sure if /var/empty should be owned by openssh-server package,
but
2007 Jul 11
1
RPM Build Question
Hi People,
I have just started building my own RPMS on both Fedora and CentOS and
generally things have gone well. Currently I am trying to create RPMS
for some commercial software that we have purchased.
Step 1 was install the software using its JAVA Based installer
ensuring that all files were installed into a particular directory in
/usr/local.
Step 2 was create a tar file of the
2005 Nov 24
2
FUSE/SSHFS RPM Packages.
Alle,
Does anyone know if there are any reputable repositories out there that
contain packages for fuse/sshfs?
Best Regards,
Camron
--
Camron W. Fox
Hilo Office
High Performance Computing Group
Fujitsu America, INC.
E-mail: cwfox at us.fujitsu.com
2011 Jul 27
4
Puppet RPM's
Does anyone know where I can get the latest puppet, 2.7.1 as RPM''s?
The spec file that comes with the puppet 2.7.1 source is broken again, and
only version 0.25.5 seems to be available via EPEL, which means that the
website''s assertion that you can get puppet as an RPM from there is somewhat
untrue.
Douglas.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
2015 Mar 24
2
error building php spec file
Hey all,
I'm attempting to build a spec file of php 5.6.7 - the latest stable -
into an rpm. And it's failing with this set of errors:
Processing files: php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64
warning: File listed twice: /etc/rc.d/init.d/php-fpm
error: Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/phar ->
/home/bluethundr/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64/usr/bin/phar.phar
warning: File listed twice:
2006 Sep 12
4
2.6.9-42.ELsmp kernel and 3ware 9550 tools
I have the latest kernel with the drivers for my 3ware 9550SX built in.
Where
can I find the tools and monitoring apps for this card? Are there rpms
hiding
somewhere, or do I need to build it from source?
--
Bowie
2006 Aug 26
0
[LLVMdev] Fedora Core 5 package
The rpm target was added after 1.8 was released so I guess you're not
using CVS version. I also made several changes to the spec file which
you might be interested in. The current version is attached.
Reid.
On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:02 +1200, David Kuestler wrote:
> There doesn't appear to be an rpm target in the Makefile.
> My spec file is derived from the included spec file