search for: defamed

On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 15:17 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > The answer is clear to me: general security principles. By the time EL8 comes out, we?ll have had ~3 years of warnings under EL7 that weak passwords would not be tolerated, and they?re finally disallowing them. Good! > > (More like 6 years, actually, because EL6 gives a red warning bar for weak passwords.) > > Let?s flip

It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm simply more familiar with the format I use on my own websites. Have you guys ever considered making a less formal wiki for LLVM documentation - a place where tiny

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org>wrote: > >> It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. >> It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a >> starving bee. I

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > It wouldn't take me more than an hour or two to do the format conversion. > It is rather trivial, actually. Just say the word and I'm on to it like a > starving bee. I guess I should get used to using the Sphinx layout; I'm > simply more familiar with the format I use on my own

On 03/02/15 10:31, Always Learning wrote: > Remember machines should be working for the convenience of Humanity - > not for the convenience of anonymous nutters who know absolutely nothing > about the user's work situation ! 'anonymous nutters'? I guess those people on the cited mail lists are using fake names. Given you're carrying on about being English, maybe you

I tried to run FAR manager under wine. Installation process was successful, but when I run FAR, my keyboard and mouse don't work (under wine). Can anybody help me solving this problem, please ? Thanks, Michal

StackOverflows says two things: 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= http://example.com/" />. 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends server redirects. It seems that LLVM.org is served by Apache 2.2.22 running on Ubuntu. In that case, the .htaccess file should make it possible to do server redirects:

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > StackOverflows says two things: > > 1. An example is: <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url= > http://example.com/" />. > 2. This apparently discouraged by the WWW Consortium who recommends > server redirects. > > It seems that LLVM.org is served by

i folk warning from diegoviola from paragway he say working for bridgecomm then teliax then flowroute isn't that a lie only? he need free morocco mobile traffic from me i refuse him i say to him if you help me with some web developement i can provide you lowered rate because was a friend of mine but now i am avoiding him step by step the asterisk folk may allready know him 190.23.0.0/16 he

We are researchers from different parts of the world and conducted a study on the world’s biggest bogus computer science conference WORLDCOMP ( http://sites.google.com/site/worlddump1 ) organized by Prof. Hamid Arabnia from University of Georgia, USA. We submitted a fake paper to WORLDCOMP 2011 and again (the same paper with a modified title) to WORLDCOMP 2012. This paper had numerous

Hi everybody, Recently I was ripped off by this company named Callcheap Networks Inc, and so did one of the carriers I recommended to them. Now I am perusing legal action against them, a mess in which I never wanted to get into. Based on my bad experience, I wanted to let everybody know if this guy named Mike Low from Call Cheap Networks Inc. (callcheap.com) contacts you, please be careful. If

Hi List I need a quality US 800 DID over IAX for my Asterisk server, preferably one that doesn't cost the earth. Any suggestions please? Thanks -- Chris Blunt Entropy IT Ltd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061220/4919f3cb/attachment.htm

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8