search for: defaillant

> But with the DNS-Tool from Windows I can see a lot of entries for samba3, all of them for services like _gc, _kerberos, _ldap, _kpasswd. Cleaned the DNS manually with the DNS application, but still I can't join. Same error.

Add a new opaque owner field to struct dev_pagemap, which will allow the hmm and migrate_vma code to identify who owns ZONE_DEVICE memory, and refuse to work on mappings not owned by the calling entity. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 1 + include/linux/memremap.h | 4

On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 08:50:38 +0200 gizmo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Cleaned the DNS manually with the DNS application, but still I > > can't join. Same error. > > I thought it was the same error, but now I saw there is a small > difference. It seems like a deleted object causes the problem. > With "ldbsearch --cross-ncs --show-deleted

Add a new opaque owner field to struct dev_pagemap, which will allow the hmm and migrate_vma code to identify who owns ZONE_DEVICE memory, and refuse to work on mappings not owned by the calling entity. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 4 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 3 +++ include/linux/memremap.h

> Cleaned the DNS manually with the DNS application, but still I can't join. Same error. I thought it was the same error, but now I saw there is a small difference. It seems like a deleted object causes the problem. With "ldbsearch --cross-ncs --show-deleted .." I can see now that entry for "samba3" (beside all other demoted servers), which appears in the error message.

Hello, now with "ldbsearch --cross-ncs ..." I dont find entries of domain controllers anymore except samba1 and samba2. sam.ldb seems to be clean now. But with the DNS-Tool from Windows I can see a lot of entries for samba3, all of them for services like _gc, _kerberos, _ldap, _kpasswd. Can this be the reason for the error I get when I join samba5 ? Do I have to delete this entries ?

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18809 Summary: X w/ nouveau driver doesn't start on G86M [GeForce 8400M GT] chip Product: xorg Version: 7.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau

Add a flags field to struct dev_pagemap to replace the altmap_valid boolean to be a little more extensible. Also add a pgmap_altmap() helper to find the optional altmap and clean up the code using the altmap using it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 10 +--------- arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 8 ++------ drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 3 +--

> Get rid of samba3 by demoting it again as you did last time, search > through sam.ldb for any mention of samba3 and samba4 (you will > probably have to use '--cross-ncs' with ldbsearch or lbdedit), then > remove them. > Now start again with a new DC, but this time, call it anything but > samba3 or samba4. Getting worse and worse .... I demoted samba3 and then also

When acting on device private mappings a driver needs to know if the device (or other entity in case of kvmppc) actually owns this private mapping. This series adds an owner field and converts the migrate_vma code over to check it. I looked into doing the same for hmm_range_fault, but as far as I can tell that code has never been wired up to actually work for device private memory, so instead of

When acting on device private mappings a driver needs to know if the device (or other entity in case of kvmppc) actually owns this private mapping. This series adds an owner field and converts the migrate_vma code over to check it. I looked into doing the same for hmm_range_fault, but as far as I can tell that code has never been wired up to actually work for device private memory, so instead of

My response is below. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Carter [SMTP:gcarter@valinux.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 12:29 PM > To: Hawks, Steven L > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA > Subject: Re: Can Samba be Installed on a Solaris 2.6 operating > system? > > "Hawks, Steven L" wrote: > > > > Can Samba be Installed on a

Hi Dan, Jérôme and Jason, below is a series that cleans up the dev_pagemap interface so that it is more easily usable, which removes the need to wrap it in hmm and thus allowing to kill a lot of code Note: this series is on top of Linux 5.2-rc5 and has some minor conflicts with the hmm tree that are easy to resolve. Diffstat summary: 32 files changed, 361 insertions(+), 1012 deletions(-) Git

Hi Dan, Jérôme and Jason, below is a series that cleans up the dev_pagemap interface so that it is more easily usable, which removes the need to wrap it in hmm and thus allowing to kill a lot of code Note: this series is on top of the rdma/hmm branch + the dev_pagemap releas fix series from Dan that went into 5.2-rc5. Git tree: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git