search for: def0

Michael, Would you please give an example or two how these two flags DESC_DRIVER and DESC_WRAP are used together? Like others, I am confused by the description and still don?t quite grok it. Steven On 9/25/17, 3:24 PM, "virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Michael S. Tsirkin" <virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of mst at redhat.com> wrote: On Wed, Sep

...at id is valid. I sees id 1, therefore id 0 and 1 has been read and are safe to overwrite. So it writes it out. It wrapped around to beginning of ring, so it flips the WRAP bit to 0 on all descriptors now: DESC[0].addr = 9ABC DESC[0].id = 0 DESC[0].flags = DESC_DRIVER | DESC_NEXT DESC[0].addr = DEF0 DESC[0].id = 1 DESC[0].flags = DESC_DRIVER Next round wrap will be 1 again. To summarise: DRIVER bit is used by driver to detect device has used one or more descriptors. WRAP is is used by device to detect driver has made a new descriptor available. -- MST

Hi! For my network setup I need the following commands: sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.proxy_ndp=1 ip -6 neigh add proxy 1234:5678:9abc:def0::2 dev eth2 The first command goes to /etc/sysctl.conf to enable it after a reboot. But where do I put the "ip -6 neigh add proxy"? Best regards Franz

...has been read and are safe to overwrite. > > So it writes it out. It wrapped around to beginning of ring, so it flips the > WRAP bit to 0 on all descriptors now: > > DESC[0].addr = 9ABC > DESC[0].id = 0 > DESC[0].flags = DESC_DRIVER | DESC_NEXT > > > DESC[0].addr = DEF0 > DESC[0].id = 1 > DESC[0].flags = DESC_DRIVER > > > Next round wrap will be 1 again. > > > To summarise: > > DRIVER bit is used by driver to detect device has used one or more > descriptors. WRAP is is used by device to detect driver has made a new > descr...

...has been read and are safe to overwrite. > > So it writes it out. It wrapped around to beginning of ring, so it flips the > WRAP bit to 0 on all descriptors now: > > DESC[0].addr = 9ABC > DESC[0].id = 0 > DESC[0].flags = DESC_DRIVER | DESC_NEXT > > > DESC[0].addr = DEF0 > DESC[0].id = 1 > DESC[0].flags = DESC_DRIVER > > > Next round wrap will be 1 again. > > > To summarise: > > DRIVER bit is used by driver to detect device has used one or more > descriptors. WRAP is is used by device to detect driver has made a new > descr...

...> > So it writes it out. It wrapped around to beginning of ring, so it flips the > > WRAP bit to 0 on all descriptors now: > > > > DESC[0].addr = 9ABC > > DESC[0].id = 0 > > DESC[0].flags = DESC_DRIVER | DESC_NEXT > > > > > > DESC[0].addr = DEF0 > > DESC[0].id = 1 > > DESC[0].flags = DESC_DRIVER > > > > > > Next round wrap will be 1 again. > > > > > > To summarise: > > > > DRIVER bit is used by driver to detect device has used one or more > > descriptors. WRAP is is us...

Hi, I installed Dovecot on FreeBSD 4-STABLE machine and have a problem. MTA is postfix delivering to ~/Maildir, runs perfectly. Dovecot is configured to use plaintext auth, config file is at the end of this mail. When trying to get mail via IMAP, I'm getting the following errors: /var/log/dovecot.log > Aug 24 12:00:35 Info: Dovecot starting up > Aug 24 12:00:51 Info: Login: goshik

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:06 PM > > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: virtualization at

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:06 PM > > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: virtualization at

...d as output/high [ 4.678107] GPIO line 507 (m.2 devslp) hogged as output/low [ 4.684417] GPIO line 508 (sfp-los) hogged as input [ 4.690022] GPIO line 509 (sfp-tx-fault) hogged as input [ 4.696380] GPIO line 510 (sfp-tx-disable) hogged as output/low [ 4.703036] GPIO line 511 (sfp-mod-def0) hogged as input [ 4.709077] GPIO line 500 (pcie2.0-clkreq) hogged as input [ 4.714593] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300) [ 4.715619] GPIO line 503 (pcie2.0-w-disable) hogged as output/low [ 4.727055] pca953x 0-0020: interrupt support not compiled in [ 4.732871]...

The Geforce 9800GT also shows different behaviour without nvidiafb in the kernel. I get lengthy messages from nouveau, like the ones found in the email attachment. It also eventually gets into the lightdm login graphical screen, but with this card the screen is highly distorted, despite the mouse cursor being properly displayed and moving around properly. Luis On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 1:14 PM,

...d as output/high [ 4.668800] GPIO line 507 (m.2 devslp) hogged as output/low [ 4.675110] GPIO line 508 (sfp-los) hogged as input [ 4.680715] GPIO line 509 (sfp-tx-fault) hogged as input [ 4.687071] GPIO line 510 (sfp-tx-disable) hogged as output/low [ 4.693729] GPIO line 511 (sfp-mod-def0) hogged as input [ 4.699769] GPIO line 500 (pcie2.0-clkreq) hogged as input [ 4.706306] GPIO line 503 (pcie2.0-w-disable) hogged as output/low [ 4.712516] ata1: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300) [ 4.718776] pca953x 0-0020: interrupt support not compiled in [ 4.724621]...

...d as output/high [ 4.620937] GPIO line 507 (m.2 devslp) hogged as output/low [ 4.621667] GPIO line 508 (sfp-los) hogged as input [ 4.622398] GPIO line 509 (sfp-tx-fault) hogged as input [ 4.623437] GPIO line 510 (sfp-tx-disable) hogged as output/low [ 4.624167] GPIO line 511 (sfp-mod-def0) hogged as input [ 4.624896] GPIO line 500 (pcie2.0-clkreq) hogged as input [ 4.625935] GPIO line 503 (pcie2.0-w-disable) hogged as output/low [ 4.626014] pca953x 0-0020: interrupt support not compiled in [ 4.626438] IR NEC protocol handler initialized [ 4.626440] IR RC5(x/sz) protoc...

Hi Ben, Thanks for your reply. My replies follow in between. Luís On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 5:40 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 January 2018 at 06:19, Luís Mendes <luis.p.mendes at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Arnd, >> >> Sorry for sending this email directly to you, but maybe you can help >> me, or guide me where to look for. >>