search for: def'ing

...build on R-forge, "https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=235&log=build_src&pkg=sos&flavor=patched", ends as follows: Error in texi2dvi(file = file, pdf = TRUE, clean = clean, quiet = quiet, : Running 'texi2dvi' on 'sos.tex' failed. LaTeX errors: ! Undefined control sequence. l.1 \Sconcordance {concordance:sos.tex:sos.Rnw:% The control sequence at the end of the top line of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have Calls: -> texi2pdf -> texi2dvi Execution halted I stepped through the vignette line by li...

...a Sweave file (see below). when I want to convert tex file generated from it into pdf, I get error message as follows: > texi2dvi("test.tex", pdf=TRUE) Error in texi2dvi("test.tex", pdf = TRUE) : Running 'texi2dvi' on 'test.tex' failed. LaTeX errors: ! Undefined control sequence. l.8 \begin {Schunk} ? ! Interruption. ! Interruption. <to be read again> { l.8 \begin{ Schunk} ! Undefined control sequence. l.9 \begin {Sinput} The control sequence at the end of the top line of your error message was...

Hello: I could use help understanding an error reported by "R CMD build sos" that's new with R 3.3.0: Error in texi2dvi(file = file, pdf = TRUE, clean = clean, quiet = quiet, : Running 'texi2dvi' on 'sos.tex' failed. LaTeX errors: ! Undefined control sequence. l.1 \Sconcordance {concordance:sos.tex:sos.Rnw:% The control sequence at the end of the top line of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have Calls: -> texi2pdf -> texi2dvi [http://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=235&log=build_src&a...

...in python "del obj") and all is well, however I was looking in libquestfs code and saw: #if 0 /* Set up a new process group, so we can signal this process * and all subprocesses (eg. if qemu is really a shell script). */ setpgid (0, 0); #endif Any reason this is "if def'ed" out? this was done in commit 88f69eb03160a62d38 I was thinking this might prevent my problem from occuring in the first place? Chris: Any special reason you are using kill_subprocess()? def kill_subprocess (self): u"""This kills the qemu subprocess. You s...

...have to be changed from long's to int's. http://www.aarongray.org/LLVM/Patches/stdint.h.diff The alternative is to add some disambiguation functions to LLVM, these would be inline and transparent with no overhead. And 'lib/System/Unix/Program.inc' has to have three lines #def'ed out on the Cygwin build. http://www.aarongray.org/LLVM/Patches/Program.inc.diff This is because Cygwin does not support RLIMIT_RSS. There are 'make check' results here :- http://www.aarongray.org/LLVM/check.txt The summary :- === Summary === # of expecte...

.../r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=235&log=build_src&pkg=sos&flavor=patched", > ends as follows: > > > Error in texi2dvi(file = file, pdf = TRUE, clean = clean, quiet = quiet, : > Running 'texi2dvi' on 'sos.tex' failed. > LaTeX errors: > ! Undefined control sequence. > l.1 \Sconcordance > {concordance:sos.tex:sos.Rnw:% > The control sequence at the end of the top line > of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have > Calls: -> texi2pdf -> texi2dvi > Execution halted > > >...

Hi, I am trying to convert a colleague from using SPSS to R, but am having trouble generating a result that is similar enough to a bootstrapped cox regression analysis that was run in SPSS. I tried unsuccessfully with bootcens, but have had some success with the bootcov function in the rms package, which at least generates confidence intervals similar to what is observed in SPSS. However, the

...atex" <pkg>_<version>.tar.gz I.e., at this command, when checking the pdf version of the manual, pdflatex throws an error of type === * checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found: ! Undefined control sequence. l.37 \inputencoding ?????????????????? {utf8} The control sequence at the end of the top line of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have === This is certainly not an urgent issue. Option --install-args="--latex" can be removed without harm for me, it...

Do you know whether it has been fixed on the 8.0.1 release? Scott On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:45 AM Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com>> wrote: The one blocking issue that existed in the past has been fixed. I haven’t had time to do any work on it lately, but I’m not aware of any fundamental problems that would make it not work on x86. --

...ld up state, it must do so for a "unit" of IR at a time (using the new PM's terminology). 2) Per-IR-unit invalidation from the pass manager is the primary mechanism to clear out stale (and thus invalid) state from any alias analysis. That means that most passes will not preserve AA by default (unlike today). 3) To be reasonably scalable, most alias analyses which retain state will need to handle these invalidation events in a way that gracefully degrades their results rather than wiping out all state. I think everything in-tree but GlobalsModRef fits these requirements already. Not...

Hi Scott, That #1073741833 is a register mask. They are treated as aggregate registers (essentially sets of registers), so if it includes R9D and R11D, it will be treated as being aliased with both. These separate defs are there because they reach disjoint registers. -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com> AI tools development From: Scott Douglas Constable <sdconsta at syr.edu> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 2:10 PM To: Scott Douglas Constable <sdconst...

Hi Scott, Sorry for the late reply, I was out of office during the holidays. 1. A def node can reach either a use node, or another def node. In the highlighted phi node (p3224), the def (d3225) reaches another def (1598) in statement (s1597), that’s why it’s needed. 2. The reason why the def of R11 in s1578 is not connected directly to the use in s1725 is that there may be an in...

...ease feel free to point that out. :) > > Great. > >> After (2) and before (3), we want to have the following invariant: >> >> ''' >> Given any location "L" in the CFG of a function, let the set of all >> values of type GCREF whose defs dominate "L" be "G": >> >> A. "G" is a superset of the references that need to be reported to >> the GC if we put a safepoint at "L". References need to be >> reported to the GC if the GC may want to scan through them...

...hink the overall design can be simplified by changing (3), (4) or (5), please feel free to point that out. :) After (2) and before (3), we want to have the following invariant: ''' Given any location "L" in the CFG of a function, let the set of all values of type GCREF whose defs dominate "L" be "G": A. "G" is a superset of the references that need to be reported to the GC if we put a safepoint at "L". References need to be reported to the GC if the GC may want to scan through them or rewrite them to point to the n...