search for: deeppatel1987

What change did you need? deep 2009/3/17 Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com>: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Attached is the patch I've been building arm-eabi with, which might >> help with linux-gnueabi. I disable multilib to get around several bugs >> with thumb. I build cross binutils first, then llvm, then llvm-gcc >> with newlib mer...

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com>wrote: > What change did you need? Even with your change, it was still complaining about not having a definition of MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P somewhere, so I took the easy way out with inserting this in arm.h: /* Overridden by arm/darwin.h, whether it is included first or not....

2010/1/25 Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com>: > Assuming you're working with an ARM target, you may also hit a problem > with the alignment option on the .comm directive. > > Attached is a first-cut patch for this latter problem. I have updated your patch to reflect the recent changes. I have also updated the...

Forgot to reply all to include the list. deep ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> Date: 2010/11/17 Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Build Attributes Proposal To: Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> 2010/11/17 Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>: >> Another use for build attributes would be as a means to record the >> bui...

I have run the torture test again svn head rev 76522 (2009/07/20) there are now 2 compilation and 23 runtime failure. A tarball with reproducers is attached. Most problems are still vargs related. Robert On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com>wrote: > I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment, > but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that > there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in > LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS and what happens...

Is anybody actively working on additional ARM target support? I need Cortex support (ARMv7, VFPv3, and Neon). Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081205/3756d719/attachment.html>

...I will have to start at the beginning. One of the first changes I'd like to try is adding the additional registers and the AAPCS VFP variant calling conventions. Is there a reason why the ARM Target isn't using the CCState machinery? Deep On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Is anybody actively working on additional ARM target support? > > I need Cortex support (ARMv7, VFPv3, and Neon). > > Thank you.

...registers and the AAPCS VFP variant calling conventions. Is there a > reason why the ARM Target isn't using the CCState machinery? Please clarify. I am not sure what you mean by CCState machinery. Evan > > > Deep > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Sandeep Patel > <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Is anybody actively working on additional ARM target support? >> >> I need Cortex support (ARMv7, VFPv3, and Neon). >> >> Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev...

On Mar 17, 2009, at 1:52 PMPDT, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com > > wrote: > What change did you need? > > Even with your change, it was still complaining about not having a > definition of MACHO_DYNAMIC_NO_PIC_P somewhere, so I took the easy > way out with inserting this in arm.h: > > /* Overridden by arm/darwin.h,...

Hi Sandeep, On 17 September 2010 18:52, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> wrote: > * Only these few renamed libcalls are set as AAPCS because other > libcalls may still want to be AAPCS-VFP. Even the F32 ones? Anton, As discussed, we might better put the FP helpers first, then deal with the REM and Memset later. If Sandeep's patch passes all...

On 17 November 2010 23:13, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> wrote: > I suppose per-function is best. I'd argue that the ARM attributes are > all per-function as well. My favorite example is > __attribute__((pcs("aapcs-vfp"))) as a function attribute to select > the calling convention. > > Maybe these attribut...

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 17 November 2010 23:13, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> wrote: >> I suppose per-function is best. I'd argue that the ARM attributes are >> all per-function as well. My favorite example is >> __attribute__((pcs("aapcs-vfp"))) as a function attribute to select >> the calling convention. >> >&...

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com>wrote: > Attached is the patch I've been building arm-eabi with, which might > help with linux-gnueabi. I disable multilib to get around several bugs > with thumb. I build cross binutils first, then llvm, then llvm-gcc > with newlib merged in. > > The followin...

2009/10/4 Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com>: > Attached is the start of a patch to make the gold plugin work on > Darwin for use as a cross-compiler. Nice. I checked that it still builds correctly on linux. I think it is fine, but Nick should probably have a look. > There needs to be a build step > somewhere in...

...I have run the torture test again svn head rev 76522 (2009/07/20) > there are now > 2 compilation and 23 runtime failure. A tarball with reproducers is > attached. > Most problems are still vargs related. > > Robert > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com > > wrote: > I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment, > but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that > there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in > LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS and what...

...#39;ve > updated the patch to the top of trunk changes as well. Thanks for doing the hard work! Can you document your journey somewhere? :-) Bob, can you review Deep's patch and commit it for him? Thanks, Evan > > deep > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com > > wrote: >> I'm not currently setup to be able to run the A/B comparison tests >> that test-suite relies upon. >> >> Fhourstones-3.1 looks to be the simplest. If you can send me the two >> .o files from either EABI or Darwin, I can dig into wh...

...o I could reproduce your results, attached is a patch that fixes the small copy&paste error of having 8-byte alignment for stack-allocated f64s instead of the proper 4-byte. I've updated the patch to the top of trunk changes as well. deep On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not currently setup to be able to run the A/B comparison tests > that test-suite relies upon. > > Fhourstones-3.1 looks to be the simplest. If you can send me the two > .o files from either EABI or Darwin, I can dig into why this went > wrong for...

...gt; I have run the torture test again svn head rev 76522 (2009/07/20) there are > now > 2 compilation and 23 runtime failure. A tarball with reproducers is > attached. > Most problems are still vargs related. > > Robert > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com>wrote: > >> I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment, >> but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that >> there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in >> LowerFORMAL_ARGUME...

Attached is the patch I've been building arm-eabi with, which might help with linux-gnueabi. I disable multilib to get around several bugs with thumb. I build cross binutils first, then llvm, then llvm-gcc with newlib merged in. The following bugs need to be addressed for these non-Darwin ARM targets: 1388 2313 2545 2985 deep On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Misha Brukman <brukman at

...well. > > Thanks for doing the hard work! Can you document your journey > somewhere? :-) > > Bob, can you review Deep's patch and commit it for him? > > Thanks, > > Evan > >> >> deep >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com >> > wrote: >>> I'm not currently setup to be able to run the A/B comparison tests >>> that test-suite relies upon. >>> >>> Fhourstones-3.1 looks to be the simplest. If you can send me the two >>> .o files from either EABI or D...