search for: deepeddi

> From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-bcc@deepeddy.com> > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 > > [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) > ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N > o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base="ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com"

Brad, I found your posting of 2/20/2004 with the subject line of "upgraded to 3.0.2 -> funkyness in machine accounts" while investigating a similar problem. I upgraded to 3.0.2 last week from 3.0.0. I have a system which I just added to the domain successfully. However, when I attempt to log a domain user onto that machine, I get this error: The system cannot log you on to

I can't figure out how to quote a colon in a filename that I'm trying to push so that it doesn't think everything in front of the colon is a hostname. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 4314 Avenue C Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500 My email address is an

I followed the directions for getting ldap support in samba that I'd found at http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-HEAD-howto.html and was perfectly happy with that until I discovered that win2000 wouldn't work with that code.... ...so, is there a version of samba that supports both ldap and win2K? Chris -- Chris Garrigues virCIO http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/

It seems that nothing else has everything that I need working, so I'm diving in to alpha territory. Chris -- Chris Garrigues virCIO http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ http://www.virCIO.Com +1 512 432 4046 +1 512 374 0500 4314 Avenue C O- Austin, TX 78751-3709 My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For

Hi all, I'd like to ask to make a version number change for the next stable release. Currently we're planning to release something we're planning to call 2.0.8. However, what I'm actually busyly creating in the CVS tree is HEAD minus vfs and dfs and some of the TNG mods. This is a very big change to call 2.0.8, which implies a minor rev. on 2.0.7. Now I still want to

Well, as Andrew shouted at me again this weekend it's getting to be about that time.... :-) :-). Yep, we're thinking we should do an official 2.2 Samba release early next week, so if you have anything you can't live with, now would be a good time to tell us.... :-). It's been gestating longer than an elephant, so it's really time to let it out into the world and do its own

nmbd has been dying on me occasionally. I'm running mandrake 9.2 with samba3-server-3.0.0-2mdk. We've got our users in ldap but I'd seen this symptom previously when I was using an earlier version of samba that didn't support ldap. There is nothing useful in the logs and a PS shows a nmb process still running. This last time around, I had a ptrace running on both nmbd

What does it mean if a windows XP consistently doesn't show up in findsmb even when it does show up in smbstatus? Also, I don't know if this is related or not, but the same machine sometimes shows up in smbstatus with two different PIDs. We've seen this with two different machines, both running XP. Here's smbstatus output (the machine in question is accountingiii): Samba

I'm seeing some very slow setup times. Here's what I did. I started ethereal while things were running fine and then I waited until my windows box didn't show up in findsmb (I have keepalive set to "yes", so I don't see why it times out at all). I then went into "My computer" which was very slow. When I look in ethereal, I see some interesting nubmers in

I'm concerned about the machine known as accountingii in the below smbstatus: Samba version 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1326 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2727 bbeerman users bbeerman1 (10.2.240.172) 30957 llawrence users df2x1121 (10.2.240.190) 28942

While I wait for an answer to my last question, allow me to ask another. When we upgraded a samba server from 2.x to 3.0.0-2mdk using LDAP, we managed to change the domain SID. Instead of fixing the SIDs on the sever, I re-added the hosts to the domain. Although it was a lot of work, it was successful on most of the systems on the network. However, we have one old NT4 box on the network

Hi, I'm running 3.0.4 and have had several reports from users both using Office and Lotus where the application tells them that the file is already in use when we know it isn't. (BTW, there's a typo on the man page under "lock spin count". "acquired", not "aquired".) Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Trinsic

A user who had not been using the server for about half an hour had to wait for over a minute before the samba server would respond. This is using samba3-server-3.0.2a-2mdk. I hope to upgrade to 3.0.4 as soon as Buchan has the RPM ready. In the below log, the user tried to log in at about 10:27 or so. I think I'm not learning anything from this log, so I've also attached part of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well. See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates. Common bugs fixed in Samba 3.0.3 include:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well. See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates. Common bugs fixed in Samba 3.0.3 include:

Rsync looks like a good tool for keeping files synchronized between two computers, such as a desktop and laptop. However, Mac OS uses a forked file system, with the second fork storing data critical to some files (such as applications) as well as type and creator information matching files up with the appropriate apps and file types. Mac OS X comes with a command-line utility called ditto

I'm not getting inbound audio from bandwidth.com. Their engineer said the invite that they're sending me looks like this: INVITE sip:+15129616808 at 67.198.16.18:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:216.82.224.202;lr;ftag=VPSF506071629460>. Record-Route: <sip:4.79.212.229;lr;ftag=VPSF506071629460>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.82.224.202;branch=z9hG4bK6314.4f7b5d05.0. Via: