search for: decresed

Dear All I'm trying to sort a matrix using function order, Some thing really odd: e.g. abc<-cbind(c(1,6,2),c(2,5,3),c(3,2,1))## matrix I want to sort if I do abc[ order(abc[,3]), increasing = TRUE] the result is correct [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 2 3 1 [2,] 6 5 2 [3,] 1 2 3 But if I want to sort in decresing order: abc[ order(abc[,3]), decreasing = TRUE] the

Hello all, I am trying out version 2.3RC3 but it seems it has the same bug as all versions before (including 2.2 KH9 which I used last) When trying to relay an on-demand stream with icecast and also limiting, I always find that icecast counts completely wrong. The first listener is not counted, but icecast connects to the master server, gets the stream and relays. If a second client

I've found the need to compute a version of order(x,y) where I want the sort order for *increasing* x and *decresing* y ... something we could imagine could be provided in the future as order(x,y, decreasing = c(FALSE, TRUE)) i.e., using a 'vectorized' decreasing argument. {No, I'm not volunteering right now!} I've found the following R-level solution and like to quiz

On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 18:07, Rene Gallati wrote: > Hello all, > > I am trying out version 2.3RC3 but it seems it has the same bug as all > versions before (including 2.2 KH9 which I used last) > > When trying to relay an on-demand stream with icecast and also limiting, > I always find that icecast counts completely wrong. The first listener > is not counted, but

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 09:06:51AM +0000, Sprencz, Pal Csongor (GE Healthcare) wrote: > In short we have a ScientificLinux7 base host OS system, on top of > that I would want to run a KVM/QEMU virtual machine. > The kvm version is used on the host OS is the following. > qemu-kvm-common-1.5.3-173.el7_8.1.x86_64 > libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu-4.5.0-23.el7_7.6.x86_64 >

What about running tasks/containers directly on the host? -----Original Message----- To: Daniel P. Berrangé Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com Subject: RE: EXT: Re: KVM/QEMU Memory Ballooning Hi Daniel, Thank you very much for the quick answer. Now it is clear how this memballooning driver works, and how it can be managed manually. I really appreciate your answer. Regards, Csongor -----Original

Hello friends I've problem with my Centos 4.3. On start some information: 1. serwer HP DL 380 x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz 2. RAM 4GB 3. HDD storage FC 4. kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP This serwer is working with another one (that some configuration) in RHEL cluster (locking by DLM), as a file serwer with samba-3.0.22. Samba have about 100 simultaneus sessions. Problem is with load

Hi, all. I just upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.1.1 in a test box(RHEL 5.2, x86_64). after upgrade, i got this warning msg: ----8< ---- # /etc/init.d/dovecot restart Stopping Dovecot Imap: [ OK ] Starting Dovecot Imap: Warning: fd limit 1024 is lower than what Dovecot can use under full load (more than 1280). Either grow the limit or change