Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "decrese".
Did you mean:
decrease
2011 Apr 06
3
function order
Dear All
I'm trying to sort a matrix using function order,
Some thing really odd:
e.g.
abc<-cbind(c(1,6,2),c(2,5,3),c(3,2,1))## matrix I want to sort
if I do
abc[ order(abc[,3]), increasing = TRUE]
the result is correct
[,1] [,2] [,3]
[1,] 2 3 1
[2,] 6 5 2
[3,] 1 2 3
But if I want to sort in decresing order:
abc[ order(abc[,3]), decreasing = TRUE]
the
2005 Sep 18
2
Icecast cannot count users for relay stream
...cast and also limiting,
I always find that icecast counts completely wrong. The first listener
is not counted, but icecast connects to the master server, gets the
stream and relays.
If a second client connects, the stream count increases to 1.
If either of the two clients disconnect, the count decreses to 0,
kicking out the other client by disconnecting from the source.
If I only connect with one client, then later disconnect, then icecast
does never disconnect from the source and logs the following line into
the log:
.. INFO sources/process_listeners listener count on /testrelay now
42949...
2008 Aug 21
1
order(x,y, decreasing = c(FALSE, TRUE)) - how / elegantly?
I've found the need to compute a version of order(x,y)
where I want the sort order
for *increasing* x and *decresing* y ...
something we could imagine could be provided in the future as
order(x,y, decreasing = c(FALSE, TRUE))
i.e., using a 'vectorized' decreasing argument.
{No, I'm not volunteering right now!}
I've found the following R-level solution and
like to quiz
2005 Sep 18
0
Icecast cannot count users for relay stream
...ays find that icecast counts completely wrong. The first listener
> is not counted, but icecast connects to the master server, gets the
> stream and relays.
>
> If a second client connects, the stream count increases to 1.
>
> If either of the two clients disconnect, the count decreses to 0,
> kicking out the other client by disconnecting from the source.
>
> If I only connect with one client, then later disconnect, then icecast
> does never disconnect from the source and logs the following line into
> the log:
>
> .. INFO sources/process_listeners list...
2020 Sep 17
0
Re: KVM/QEMU Memory Ballooning
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 09:06:51AM +0000, Sprencz, Pal Csongor (GE Healthcare) wrote:
> In short we have a ScientificLinux7 base host OS system, on top of
> that I would want to run a KVM/QEMU virtual machine.
> The kvm version is used on the host OS is the following.
> qemu-kvm-common-1.5.3-173.el7_8.1.x86_64
> libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu-4.5.0-23.el7_7.6.x86_64
>
2020 Sep 17
0
RE: EXT: Re: KVM/QEMU Memory Ballooning
What about running tasks/containers directly on the host?
-----Original Message-----
To: Daniel P. Berrangé
Cc: libvirt-users@redhat.com
Subject: RE: EXT: Re: KVM/QEMU Memory Ballooning
Hi Daniel,
Thank you very much for the quick answer. Now it is clear how this
memballooning driver works, and how it can be managed manually.
I really appreciate your answer.
Regards,
Csongor
-----Original
2006 Aug 17
5
Big load
Hello friends
I've problem with my Centos 4.3.
On start some information:
1. serwer HP DL 380 x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz
2. RAM 4GB
3. HDD storage FC
4. kernel 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP
This serwer is working with another one (that some configuration) in
RHEL cluster (locking by DLM), as a file serwer with samba-3.0.22. Samba
have about 100 simultaneus sessions. Problem is with load
2008 Jun 29
2
fd limit 1024 is lower in dovecot-1.1.1
Hi, all.
I just upgrade from 1.0.15 to 1.1.1 in a test box(RHEL 5.2, x86_64).
after upgrade, i got this warning msg:
----8< ----
# /etc/init.d/dovecot restart
Stopping Dovecot Imap: [ OK ]
Starting Dovecot Imap: Warning: fd limit 1024 is lower than what Dovecot
can use under full load (more than 1280). Either grow the limit or
change