search for: decrementing

I have a Person model with a points attribute. For the most part, points values will be incremented and decremented via user votes. However, I''d also like to decrement a Person''s points by half a point each day. How do I automatically decrement the value once per day? Your help is greatly appreciated :) Becky -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this

I'm relatively new to LLVM so apologies in advance if this is a dumb question. I've been experimenting with re-targeting LLVM onto a 16-bit micro which has pre and post increment and decrement addressing modes. I've been using llvm-gcc to generate llvm bitcode and llvm 2.7 to go from here to my target assembly code. I've got the Combine pass to deal with

When virtio device is removed, dev_index does not get decremented. The next device hotplug event results in consuming the next pci to the one that is suppose to be available. Signed-off-by: Takuma Umeya <tumeya at redhat.com> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c index efb35aa..67fe71d 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c @@ -216,6

When virtio device is removed, dev_index does not get decremented. The next device hotplug event results in consuming the next pci to the one that is suppose to be available. Signed-off-by: Takuma Umeya <tumeya at redhat.com> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c index efb35aa..67fe71d 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c @@ -216,6

When virtio block device is removed, index does not get decremented. When another virtio disk is attached it uses the next device letter to the one that is suppose to be available. Signed-off-by: Takuma Umeya <tumeya at redhat.com> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 6ecf89c..730e7af 100644 --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++

When virtio block device is removed, index does not get decremented. When another virtio disk is attached it uses the next device letter to the one that is suppose to be available. Signed-off-by: Takuma Umeya <tumeya at redhat.com> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 6ecf89c..730e7af 100644 --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c +++

Commit-ID: 4bfffb1572c9d1b77538b5a3e92c27f91bd2ee99 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=4bfffb1572c9d1b77538b5a3e92c27f91bd2ee99 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:00:31 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:55 +0000 [klibc] dash: expand: Fix

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer > from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in > virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the > 'next_avail_idx' to the previous correct index after an unused buffer > is detatched from the vq. >

On 2019/8/9 ??2:48, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer > from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in > virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the > 'next_avail_idx' to the previous correct index after an unused buffer > is detatched from the vq. > > Signed-off-by:

When detaching a buffer from a vq, the avail.idx value should be decremented as well. This was noticed by hot-unplugging a virtio console port and then plugging in a new one on the same number (re-using the vqs which were just 'disowned'). qemu reported 'Guest moved used index from 0 to 256' when any IO was attempted on the new port. CC: stable at kernel.org Reported-by:

When detaching a buffer from a vq, the avail.idx value should be decremented as well. This was noticed by hot-unplugging a virtio console port and then plugging in a new one on the same number (re-using the vqs which were just 'disowned'). qemu reported 'Guest moved used index from 0 to 256' when any IO was attempted on the new port. CC: stable at kernel.org Reported-by:

PyObject_CallObject is powerful, but awkward - we have to wrap all arguments into a temporary tuple before using it. Let python do more of the work by using PyObject_CallFunction anywhere that all arguments can be described by a Py_BuildValue() format string, instead of creating one-shot arguments ourselves. In fact, for our py_config(), this makes it easier to not worry about python 2 String vs.

> The predecrement / decrement operators *do* exist on this iterator: > https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/include/ > llvm/ADT/ilist_iterator.h#L153 > > Maybe you meant: > > llvm::Function *f; > foo(&*--f->arg_end()); > > ? > Correct, I mean exactly this. Though &* is not important in this case. This code doesn't work anymore, as

Hey all, The frequency count returned by my ferret reader doesn''t decrement after I remove a documents with those terms. Using the example from http://ferret.davebalmain.com/api/classes/Ferret/Index/TermEnum.html the frequency increments after a document is added but stays the same after a document is deleted. index.reader.terms(:tags).each do |term, freq| "#{term} appears

As soon as the application starts, a window pops up that (normally under windows) would say "this is a trial version demo, click okay to start the trial", or something along those lines. The window is blank and clicking randomly on it (to find the "ok") does not work either. The following output from wine during this test is as follows : err:iphlpapi:getRouteTable Received

This patch decrements 'next_avail_idx' count when detaching a buffer from vq for packed ring code. Split ring code already does this in virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split function. This updates the 'next_avail_idx' to the previous correct index after an unused buffer is detatched from the vq. Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta at redhat.com> ---

Is overriding ActiveRecord#save verboten? Doing this causes increment! and decrement! to break (1 for 0 argument error): def save create_or_update # also tried ''super'' # do stuff end Joe -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I read section 5, oop, of the R lang doc, and I am still not sure I understand how to build a class in R for oop. I thought that since I understand the oop syntex of Java and VB, I am wondering if the R programmig experts could help me out by comparing and contrasting the oop syntex in R with that of Java. For example, the basic class structure in Java is like this: public class Bicycle {

Reid, After your recent redefinition of arg_iterator, it's missing increment/decrement operators (which people typically expect to be defined for iterators). So some external code relying on this is broken. If it's not intentional, would be nice to have it fixed. Specific code that I is broken looks like this: llvm::Function f; foo(--f->arg_end()); // passing the last argument to the

vhost checked the counter within the refcnt before decrementing. It really wanted to know that it is the one that has the last reference, as a way to batch freeing resources a bit more efficiently. Note: we only let refcount go to 0 on device release. This works well but we now access the ref counter twice so there's a race: all users might see a high co...