search for: decode_only

Is anybody interested in cleanly separating encode and decode in vorbis? I'm trying to take a stab at it myself from the head of cvs as of this morning, but it looks like a lot of files contain both encode-only and decode-only functions. An obvious one is mdct.c, which contains mdct_forward and mdct_backward (which isn't that big of a deal, since both are pretty well-contained, but it

...double tot_samples=0; opus_uint64 tot_in, tot_out; - int bandwidth=-1; + int bandwidth=OPUS_AUTO; const char *bandwidth_string; int lost = 0, lost_prev = 1; int toggle = 0; opus_uint32 enc_final_range[2]; opus_uint32 dec_final_range; int encode_only=0, decode_only=0; - int max_frame_size = 960*6; + int max_frame_size = 48000*2; int curr_read=0; int sweep_bps = 0; int random_framesize=0, newsize=0, delayed_celt=0; @@ -336,15 +336,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) /* defaults: */ use_vbr = 1; - bandwidth = OPUS_AUTO;...

I am wont to decode a speex 11kbps 8kHz 16bit to a raw data 8kHz 16bit LSB on a c5509. Trying to understand the "testenc-TI-C5x.c" exsample, but it looks to me wary complicated. Is there more documentation for the exsample or a decoder exsample available? Can somebody help? Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi; I have a question about speex on TMS320C54X: I have build and run the related project on Code Composer Studio IDE (ver. 3.1) and the male.snd (93.7KB) was its input file and malebits5x.dat (5.85KB) and maleout5x.snd (93.5KB) are output files. What is malebits5x.dat file? if it is encoded file, why I could'nt decode it? Also if maleout5x.snd is output recoverd file why after

...e. Is it correct that you have modeled your main loop after testenc-TI-c5x.c? If you look at encoded silence with a binary editor, you should be able to see the 20-byte repetition pattern. You can also use the sample simulator build, if you can capture your encoder output to a file. There is a DECODE_ONLY switch in that build, that lets you run just that portion. - Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Jacobson To: Jim Crichton ; speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Shoehorning speex is confusing a newbie Jean-Marc was correct i...

.... Is it correct that you have modeled your main loop after testenc-TI-c5x.c? If you look at encoded silence with a binary editor, you should be able to see the 20-byte repetition pattern. You can also use the sample simulator build, if you can capture your encoder output to a file. There is a DECODE_ONLY switch in that build, that lets you run just that portion. - Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Jacobson To: Jim Crichton ; speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:48 PM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Shoehorning speex is confusing a newbie Jean-Marc was correct in that the...

Hello all, after FOMS I decided to take a look at the opus library and I found that I could improve a bit the build system and cleanup the code a little bit. Most of the changes to the code has been suggested by my two tools cowstats and missingstatic (part of the ruby-elf gem if you care). HTH, Diego