Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "decl_function_cod".
Did you mean:
decl_function_code
2006 Sep 01
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
...working copy)
@@ -713,7 +713,11 @@
TREE_PUBLIC (decl) = 1;
if (library_name)
SET_DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (decl, get_identifier (library_name));
+#ifndef ENABLE_LLVM
make_decl_rtl (decl);
+#else
+ make_decl_llvm (decl);
+#endif
pushdecl (decl);
DECL_BUILT_IN_CLASS (decl) = class;
DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (decl) = function_code;
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c (revision 160)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c (working copy)
@@ -1334,7 +1334,11 @@
}
/* Create RTL for function definition. */
+#i...
2006 Sep 01
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote:
> Hi, I have a first quick patch and a question. The patch links f951
> with g++ when LLVM is enabled. It's at the end of this email.
Thanks, applied!
> I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them
> like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to
> the tree. I'd like to
2006 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
Hi, I have a first quick patch and a question. The patch links f951
with g++ when LLVM is enabled. It's at the end of this email.
I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them
like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to
the tree. I'd like to make it as easy as possible to apply these, so
let me know any rules I should be following.