search for: deception

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 104 matches for "deception".

Did you mean: reception
2017 Feb 14
1
[Bug 1122] New: --list command can be deceptive in some cases.
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122 Bug ID: 1122 Summary: --list command can be deceptive in some cases. Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee: netfilter-buglog at
2008 Mar 07
2
[LLVMdev] Pass::runPass?
The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used anywhere. Can someone explain what runPass is for? Thanks, Dan
2012 Sep 23
3
Confused by code?
x<-matrix(c(1,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,1),nrow=3) > y<-matrix(c(0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0),nrow=3) > z<-matrix(c(0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0),nrow=3) > x[z]<-y[z] The resultant matrix x is all zeros except for the last two diagonal cells which are 1's. While y is lower triangualr 0's with the remaining cells all ones. I really don't understand how this deceptively simple looking piece of
2008 May 02
2
barplot with log base 2 scale or shift the x-axis
Hi, I have data that is on a log base 2 scale. It goes from negative factors of 2 to positive ones. I am using barplot. However, I don't want the data centered at 0 - I want the min of the yaxis to be just below the lowest value in the data. The plots are kind of deceptive switching between positive and negative. I see that barplot has a log option, but that doesn't seem to be
2012 Mar 19
5
[LLVMdev] recognizing DTORs and vptr updates in LLVM.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > Hello, > > While instrumenting LLVM IR in ThreadSanitizer (race detector), I need > to distinguish between a store to vtable pointer (vptr) and any other > regular store. > This special treatment should be limited to class
2012 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] recognizing DTORs and vptr updates in LLVM.
>> Using instruction level metadata for this would be appropriate. However, I >> also don't understand why a race on this is truly benign. > > It isn't, really; calling it "benign" is deceptive. It's just that > storing a pointer which is equal to the existing pointer stored at a > given address almost always makes the optimizer/codegen generate code
2013 Jun 26
1
dumb slave
Hi list, I?ve been struggling with nut some time to get it to do as I wish without any succes. Nut configured as a "client": Can upsmon catch events and do actions in upssched-cmd? Like " onbatt) shutdown blabla" After a reload configs of upsmon syslog gives me: Jun 26 16:06:44 pascal-desktop upsmon[1037]: Reloading configuration Jun 26 16:06:44
2005 May 17
3
validates_associated / error_messages_for
When a validates_asssociated fails... I get something like Address is invalid is there a way, preferably on a per-association basis to have the error messaage include the actual error like Zipcode is too long (max is 10 characters) _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org
2005 Aug 01
2
function.prototype.bind return value?
Quick question - how come the function.prototype.bind doesn''t allow for return values? Am I missing some basic understanding of how this works? I searched and couldn''t find an answer. Specifically, I''m binding an object method to an existing form''s onSubmit, but it still actually submits the form, refreshing the page - which is not what I want. If change
2008 Mar 07
0
[LLVMdev] Pass::runPass?
On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that > isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a > PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass > does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used anywhere. > Can someone explain what runPass is for? Only BasicBlockPass
2008 Mar 07
1
[LLVMdev] Pass::runPass?
On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > >> The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that >> isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a >> PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass >> does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used
2005 Jun 29
2
Unit testing
Recently, I''ve started to write unit tests for some of my scripts. In general,it''s no worse in JavaScript than in Ruby or Java. I didn''t have the courage to try Selenium, but had a look at JsUnit. Unfortunately, in Konqueror it produces unfathomable errors and in Firefox it is slow beyond imagination. Anyway, writing tests for functions that are computational or
2003 Dec 15
1
Yet another vf question...
Should I ov_clear a failed ov_open/test/test_open call? The xmms plugin does an fclose on failure, and that seems to work, but I thought I ought to know for certain. (An observation: I think the quantity of questions and bugs raised along the lines of "I did open file, ov_open, ov_read, close file, open another file, ov_read, and it exploded", or "I tried to make vorbisfile go
2012 May 07
0
[LLVMdev] Discussion of eliminating the void type
On May 7, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Lyu Mitnick <mitnick.lyu at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am willing to do "eliminating the void type" project. Is this really a good idea? I'm not going to argue at length about it, but it is worth thinking about. The only practical downsides of void are when newcomers take C's syntax for functions with no arguments a little
2005 Nov 26
1
(no subject)
...g network, the database application runs slowly (access data) in this client machine and in others NT machines that are added to the LAN. If i substitute this samba server with a Win2k3 Standard Server, the application latency backs to the original (or close), before the NT clients. This was a big deception to me and since then, i'm trying to find why this happens but i'm specialist. I have observed in the ethereal sniffer that exists a lot of "Locking AndX Request" and "Locking AndX Response" that is highly "ping pong" communication between the server and the cl...
2001 Dec 05
1
Non-linear random variables
...MATLAB). There are two fixed parameters and a random environmental effect that is linked to a first order lagged correlation fixed parameter. Are there any examples of fitting this model I could follow? Cheers Norm Good Fisheries Biologist (Mathematician) Southern Fisheries Centre PO Box 76, Deception Bay Q 4508 telephone 3817 9588, fascimile 3817 9555 ********************************DISCLAIMER**************************** The information contained in the above e-mail message or messages (which includes any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for...
2012 Mar 20
2
[LLVMdev] recognizing DTORs and vptr updates in LLVM.
On Mar 20, 2012, at 12:51 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Using instruction level metadata for this would be appropriate. However, I >>> also don't understand why a race on this is truly benign. >> >> It isn't, really; calling it "benign" is deceptive. It's just that >> storing a pointer which is equal to the existing pointer stored at a
2013 Oct 18
1
Feedback regarding the ssh(1) Match directive
Hi, I noticed the recent commit adding Match support to ssh(1). I look forward to giving it a try, but I have some initial feedback based on ssh_config.5 and an examiniation of match_cfg_line(). First, the "command" keyword could be a little deceptive. Although the man page makes the use of this keyword quite clear, my initial assumption was that the intent was to match against the
2024 Oct 24
1
Could .Primitive("[") stop forcing R_Visible = TRUE?
Hello, The "[" primitive operator currently has the 'eval' flag set to 0 in src/main/names.c. This means that the result of subsetting, whether R-native or implemented by a method, will never be invisible(). This is a very reasonable default: if the user goes as far as to subset a value, they probably want to see the result. Unfortunately, there also exists at least one
2010 Dec 01
3
RFC: sapply() limitation from vector to matrix, but not further
sapply() stems from S / S+ times and hence has a long tradition. In spite of that I think that it should be enhanced... As the subject mentions, sapply() produces a matrix in cases where the list components of the lapply(.) results are of the same length (and ...). However, it unfortunately "stops there". E.g., if you *nest* two sapply() calls where the inner one produces a matrix, very