Displaying 20 results from an estimated 104 matches for "decentralizing".
Did you mean:
centralizing
2010 Feb 25
2
decentral vpn with 1 gateway host
Hello tinc users,
i have the follow configuration:
1 client/server called master, it is always reachable from internet
(with dyndns)
5 clients, that connects to the master and the other clients (all behind
a router (NAT))
master-hosts-file:
Address = ...
Port = ...
Subnet = ...
Compression = 0
---- key -----
client-hosts-files:
Compression = 0
Subnet = ...
----- key -----
tinc.conf
Name = ....
2004 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
On Sat, 1 May 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> I'd be happy to contribute more and in fact, there are lots of things I
> could and would contribute. Pretty much the only thing that stops me is
> the project's CVS policy.
Wow, I really had no idea that this was such a problem!
> (erm, perhaps I'm just over-booked? :)
Heh, I know a little bit of that feeling ;)
> I need
2011 Apr 15
2
source questions & intentions to patch: yp-timing & auth
Good Day,
Looking at the SVN repo: there's 30+ commits since the 2.6.2 release;
the last one from August 2009. Are there any intentions to roll a
release anytime soon? Are there any more recent branches?
I'm currently looking into extending icecast2 (more below) and am
wondering if I should base the patches on 2.6.2+debian-fixes or
work from svn-trunk?
We are using a cluster of icecast
2015 Sep 21
3
New software based on libvirt
Hello,
I'm introducing to you the decentralized cloud Cherrypop.
Combining libvirt and LizardFS (as of now) it becomes a cloud completely
without masters. Thus, any node is sufficient for the cloud to be up
and therefore no wasted resources and no single point of failure.
It's still pretty crude software but will work with some tinkering. Hope
you try it and like it!
For more
2004 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
Chris Lattner wrote:
> The more I've thought about this, the more that I'm beginning to realize
> that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to
> seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version
> control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've
> heard rumars that there are now several good
2008 Feb 15
17
centralized or decentralized puppet infrastructure
Hi All,
In my companies environment, we have multiple sites in multiple geographic
locations, sometimes with high latency between the sites.
I''m trying to come up with a solution that could provide puppet
infrastructure to all sites nodes.
----a few assumptions---
- puppet manifest / configuration is fetched from a centralized version
control system.
- store db is needed (ssh keys,
2012 Dec 04
5
[LLVMdev] Difficulties Getting a Bug Fix Committed
Hi all,
I've been waiting for almost three months now to get a patch committed to LLVM
that fixes what I consider to be a fairly significant bug in the JIT
(http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13678) but I've been having a hard time
getting traction on it. So far Duncan Sands is the only one who has given it
any attention, but as of the last time I checked it still wasn't committed
2016 Dec 04
2
Very very slow SAMBA sharing on Ubuntu (with StorjShare-CLI)
I’m using a decentralized data storage application named StorjShare-CLI :
https://github.com/Storj/storjshare-cli
This application store data into « nodes ». StorjShare-CLI can run 1 or
several « nodes » in order to store data located at different places.
On a given Ubuntu machine I’m running both nodes located on this machine
AND also nodes located on another machine (a Netgear ReadyNAS)
2014 Aug 11
3
Asterisk support for Bittorrent Bleep
Hello,
Full disclosure: my name is Farid Fadaie and I'm in charge of BitTorrent
Bleep (a private P2P SIP-based messaging application in early alpha)
http://blog.bittorrent.com/2014/07/30/building-an-engine-for-decentralized-communications/
I have personally been a fan of Asterisk and have been using it for years
and now that we have (kind of) released Bleep, I wanted to ask you guys to
let
2006 Mar 06
4
Wishlist - Give R a name that shows up in search engines...
Hi everyone,
I know this is a long shot but I just wanted to throw it out
there. I have lately been using R a lot and have found that it is
basically impossible to find any code help or answers via google
searching because the name "R" is simply not explicit enough. For
every other popular program or programming language a simple search
with the name of the program and your
2006 Aug 12
4
Several files's checksum change without reason
Hi list,
I'm a bit worried here. On a server, Centos 4.3 fully-patched SELinux
activated, Osiris (a decentralized scanner for files changes on distant
servers) signaled me several changes on files who were not (at first
sight) affected by a recent update (the list is below).
Is there a logic explanation for those changes to happen ? The "rpm -Va"
command does not output md5sum
2004 May 02
4
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 20:57, Chris Lattner wrote:
> > (b) move the CVS repository somewhere that doesn't have the University's
> > restrictions. That last option, however, may have additional
> > intellectual property issues.
>
> I don't think that there would be IP issues: LLVM is (effectively) BSD
> licensed, so it could be forked at any time without a
2004 May 01
5
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 10:57, Chris Lattner wrote:
> There is a chance, but as Vikram mentioned, it's not extremely likely to
> happen in the immediate future. However, if you or someone else wrote the
> makefiles neccesary to the suite to the llvm/test/Programs hierarchy, we
> would be happy to add them and have our automated testers run them. :)
>
> In particular, I'd
2011 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
To add to the social aspect, I can say from personal experience (as a
student/enthusiast developer) that contributing to open source projects that
use a decentralized SCM model (e.g. git) is easier than a centralized (e.g.
subversion) model. I can create a clone on github (or local, or wherever),
commit all that I want, then send pull requests or patches to the upstream
maintainers. With a
2015 Sep 22
1
Re: [libvirt] New software based on libvirt
On 09/22/2015 05:12 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 21.09.2015 21:28, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm introducing to you the decentralized cloud Cherrypop.
>>
>> Combining libvirt and LizardFS (as of now) it becomes a cloud completely
>> without masters. Thus, any node is sufficient for the cloud to be up
>> and therefore no
2004 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Open Source Contributions (was Re: Benchmarks)
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all
> > of the version control issues that we are facing, and supports
> > decentralized development in particular. From what I understand, you
> > would be able to do all of your development on your own "local" branch,
> > others
2024 Jun 11
5
Group Policy alternative (Looking for feedback on a project)
Hello all,
So I am working on a group policy-like system based around Ansible.
Essentially, I am going to use Ansible playbooks as a cross-platform
alternative to the Windows registry and Group Policy Objects (GPOs). In
Samba, the way the group policy is applied is that it reads the set
registry values and then tries to translate that into Linux language.
This is inefficient and limiting as
2011 Apr 19
0
source questions & intentions to patch: yp-timing & auth
Hi Robin,
First, please let me state that I'm not xiph, nor an IceCast maintainer,
all I'm saying here are my views, but, as nobody answered your mail, I
guess it's better than nothing.
Robin Gareus <robin at gareus.org> writes:
> Looking at the SVN repo: there's 30+ commits since the 2.6.2 release;
> the last one from August 2009. Are there any intentions to roll a
2011 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
On Sep 8, 2011, at 5:09 PM, David A. Greene wrote:
>> For me, the question is "why do we *need* to switch our versioning
>> system?". Nothing is broken with our current model.
>
> There are things broken with the current model, though you may not care
> about them. It is not possible to conveniently keep a private copy of
> LLVM and associated projects and sync
2016 Dec 05
4
Very very slow SAMBA sharing on Ubuntu (with StorjShare-CLI)
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 00:41:35 -0800
ToddAndMargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 12/04/2016 03:37 AM, Bernard Chabot via samba wrote:
> > I’m using a decentralized data storage application named
> > StorjShare-CLI : https://github.com/Storj/storjshare-cli
> >
> > This application store data into « nodes ». StorjShare-CLI can run
> > 1 or