search for: decentralization

Hello tinc users, i have the follow configuration: 1 client/server called master, it is always reachable from internet (with dyndns) 5 clients, that connects to the master and the other clients (all behind a router (NAT)) master-hosts-file: Address = ... Port = ... Subnet = ... Compression = 0 ---- key ----- client-hosts-files: Compression = 0 Subnet = ... ----- key ----- tinc.conf Name = ....

On Sat, 1 May 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > I'd be happy to contribute more and in fact, there are lots of things I > could and would contribute. Pretty much the only thing that stops me is > the project's CVS policy. Wow, I really had no idea that this was such a problem! > (erm, perhaps I'm just over-booked? :) Heh, I know a little bit of that feeling ;) > I need

Good Day, Looking at the SVN repo: there's 30+ commits since the 2.6.2 release; the last one from August 2009. Are there any intentions to roll a release anytime soon? Are there any more recent branches? I'm currently looking into extending icecast2 (more below) and am wondering if I should base the patches on 2.6.2+debian-fixes or work from svn-trunk? We are using a cluster of icecast

Hello, I'm introducing to you the decentralized cloud Cherrypop. Combining libvirt and LizardFS (as of now) it becomes a cloud completely without masters. Thus, any node is sufficient for the cloud to be up and therefore no wasted resources and no single point of failure. It's still pretty crude software but will work with some tinkering. Hope you try it and like it! For more

Chris Lattner wrote: > The more I've thought about this, the more that I'm beginning to realize > that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to > seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version > control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've > heard rumars that there are now several good

Hi All, In my companies environment, we have multiple sites in multiple geographic locations, sometimes with high latency between the sites. I''m trying to come up with a solution that could provide puppet infrastructure to all sites nodes. ----a few assumptions--- - puppet manifest / configuration is fetched from a centralized version control system. - store db is needed (ssh keys,

Hi all, I've been waiting for almost three months now to get a patch committed to LLVM that fixes what I consider to be a fairly significant bug in the JIT (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13678) but I've been having a hard time getting traction on it. So far Duncan Sands is the only one who has given it any attention, but as of the last time I checked it still wasn't committed

I’m using a decentralized data storage application named StorjShare-CLI : https://github.com/Storj/storjshare-cli This application store data into « nodes ». StorjShare-CLI can run 1 or several « nodes » in order to store data located at different places. On a given Ubuntu machine I’m running both nodes located on this machine AND also nodes located on another machine (a Netgear ReadyNAS)

Hello, Full disclosure: my name is Farid Fadaie and I'm in charge of BitTorrent Bleep (a private P2P SIP-based messaging application in early alpha) http://blog.bittorrent.com/2014/07/30/building-an-engine-for-decentralized-communications/ I have personally been a fan of Asterisk and have been using it for years and now that we have (kind of) released Bleep, I wanted to ask you guys to let

Hi everyone, I know this is a long shot but I just wanted to throw it out there. I have lately been using R a lot and have found that it is basically impossible to find any code help or answers via google searching because the name "R" is simply not explicit enough. For every other popular program or programming language a simple search with the name of the program and your

Hi list, I'm a bit worried here. On a server, Centos 4.3 fully-patched SELinux activated, Osiris (a decentralized scanner for files changes on distant servers) signaled me several changes on files who were not (at first sight) affected by a recent update (the list is below). Is there a logic explanation for those changes to happen ? The "rpm -Va" command does not output md5sum

On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 20:57, Chris Lattner wrote: > > (b) move the CVS repository somewhere that doesn't have the University's > > restrictions. That last option, however, may have additional > > intellectual property issues. > > I don't think that there would be IP issues: LLVM is (effectively) BSD > licensed, so it could be forked at any time without a

On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 10:57, Chris Lattner wrote: > There is a chance, but as Vikram mentioned, it's not extremely likely to > happen in the immediate future. However, if you or someone else wrote the > makefiles neccesary to the suite to the llvm/test/Programs hierarchy, we > would be happy to add them and have our automated testers run them. :) > > In particular, I'd

To add to the social aspect, I can say from personal experience (as a student/enthusiast developer) that contributing to open source projects that use a decentralized SCM model (e.g. git) is easier than a centralized (e.g. subversion) model. I can create a clone on github (or local, or wherever), commit all that I want, then send pull requests or patches to the upstream maintainers. With a

On 09/22/2015 05:12 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 21.09.2015 21:28, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm introducing to you the decentralized cloud Cherrypop. >> >> Combining libvirt and LizardFS (as of now) it becomes a cloud completely >> without masters. Thus, any node is sufficient for the cloud to be up >> and therefore no

On Wed, 5 May 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all > > of the version control issues that we are facing, and supports > > decentralized development in particular. From what I understand, you > > would be able to do all of your development on your own "local" branch, > > others

Hi Robin, First, please let me state that I'm not xiph, nor an IceCast maintainer, all I'm saying here are my views, but, as nobody answered your mail, I guess it's better than nothing. Robin Gareus <robin at gareus.org> writes: > Looking at the SVN repo: there's 30+ commits since the 2.6.2 release; > the last one from August 2009. Are there any intentions to roll a

On Sep 8, 2011, at 5:09 PM, David A. Greene wrote: >> For me, the question is "why do we *need* to switch our versioning >> system?". Nothing is broken with our current model. > > There are things broken with the current model, though you may not care > about them. It is not possible to conveniently keep a private copy of > LLVM and associated projects and sync

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 00:41:35 -0800 ToddAndMargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 12/04/2016 03:37 AM, Bernard Chabot via samba wrote: > > I’m using a decentralized data storage application named > > StorjShare-CLI : https://github.com/Storj/storjshare-cli > > > > This application store data into « nodes ». StorjShare-CLI can run > > 1 or

Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> writes: >>> It's my understanding that the upcoming new version of SVN will have >>> off-line commits available. >> >> Frankly, that's the least important feature git has. >> > And yet it's the first one that people point out. :-) It is? I think you may be confusing offline operation with private