search for: decentral

Hello tinc users, i have the follow configuration: 1 client/server called master, it is always reachable from internet (with dyndns) 5 clients, that connects to the master and the other clients (all behind a router (NAT)) master-hosts-file: Address = ... Port = ... Subnet = ... Compression = 0 ---- key ----- client-hosts-files: Compression = 0 Subnet = ... ----- key ----- tinc.conf Name = ....

...ked at any time without a problem. This would obviously be very bad for LLVM, but it's possible. The more I've thought about this, the more that I'm beginning to realize that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've heard rumars that there are now several good options. Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all of the version control issues that we are facing, and supports d...

...09. Are there any intentions to roll a release anytime soon? Are there any more recent branches? I'm currently looking into extending icecast2 (more below) and am wondering if I should base the patches on 2.6.2+debian-fixes or work from svn-trunk? We are using a cluster of icecast servers as decentralized stream-servers for theartcollider.org project and rely on the yellow-pages protocol to gather information about available streams/servers. Basically I'm interested in (1) making YP timing configurable (more frequent updates <30sec) (2) adding a decentralized authentication mechanism...

Hello, I'm introducing to you the decentralized cloud Cherrypop. Combining libvirt and LizardFS (as of now) it becomes a cloud completely without masters. Thus, any node is sufficient for the cloud to be up and therefore no wasted resources and no single point of failure. It's still pretty crude software but will work with some tinker...

Chris Lattner wrote: > The more I've thought about this, the more that I'm beginning to realize > that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to > seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version > control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've > heard rumars that there are now several good options. > > Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all > of the version control issues that we ar...

...nd mainly build your configuration to detect from where you are connecting...) --- Centralized option --- + easiest to manage. + can use store config centrally - one location for the db. + one global CA + can scale up with Mongrel (or others). - Slow for remote clients - possible WAN cut off --- Decentralized option 1 - local puppet server + local sql db --- + fast local response time + no dependency to any other remote services. - store config db has to be exported to centralized db in order to have a global view. --- Decentralized option 2 - local puppet server + centralized remote db --- + fast...

...9;t committed and the bug is still open. Right now we ship our code with a patch to fix this in 3.1, I really don't want to have to do that again for 3.2. I appreciate the difficulties in running a project as large as LLVM, and it looks like there are some recent structural changes that might decentralize some of the review/commit burden, but it doesn't speak well for your project when you have a bug with a fix and a unit test just ready to go that's not getting into the next release. Can anyone help me move this forward? =================================================================...

I’m using a decentralized data storage application named StorjShare-CLI : https://github.com/Storj/storjshare-cli This application store data into « nodes ». StorjShare-CLI can run 1 or several « nodes » in order to store data located at different places. On a given Ubuntu machine I’m running both nodes located on th...

Hello, Full disclosure: my name is Farid Fadaie and I'm in charge of BitTorrent Bleep (a private P2P SIP-based messaging application in early alpha) http://blog.bittorrent.com/2014/07/30/building-an-engine-for-decentralized-communications/ I have personally been a fan of Asterisk and have been using it for years and now that we have (kind of) released Bleep, I wanted to ask you guys to let us know what you think. Considering that Bleep is built on an engine (think of it as a distributed SIP proxy) that supports S...

...ind out how to program something in most languages and programs. You can't do this in R because its name is not unique enough, and that seriously hampers the ability of both new and expert users to accomplish things quickly. I realize that there is the R-project website and so on, but the decentralized nature of the web assures that not not everyone will post their answers there and people such as me who search google first rather than going straight to a single site will have a hard time finding answers. So seriously, has there ever been any discussion about renaming R so that people...

Hi list, I'm a bit worried here. On a server, Centos 4.3 fully-patched SELinux activated, Osiris (a decentralized scanner for files changes on distant servers) signaled me several changes on files who were not (at first sight) affected by a recent update (the list is below). Is there a logic explanation for those changes to happen ? The "rpm -Va" command does not output md5sum change for those...

...code base. But we can change the source code control repository without forking. > > The more I've thought about this, the more that I'm beginning to realize > that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to > seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version > control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've > heard rumars that there are now several good options. > > Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all > of the version control issues that we a...

On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 10:57, Chris Lattner wrote: > There is a chance, but as Vikram mentioned, it's not extremely likely to > happen in the immediate future. However, if you or someone else wrote the > makefiles neccesary to the suite to the llvm/test/Programs hierarchy, we > would be happy to add them and have our automated testers run them. :) > > In particular, I'd

To add to the social aspect, I can say from personal experience (as a student/enthusiast developer) that contributing to open source projects that use a decentralized SCM model (e.g. git) is easier than a centralized (e.g. subversion) model. I can create a clone on github (or local, or wherever), commit all that I want, then send pull requests or patches to the upstream maintainers. With a subversion repository, I have to create a separate local checkout f...

On 09/22/2015 05:12 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 21.09.2015 21:28, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm introducing to you the decentralized cloud Cherrypop. >> >> Combining libvirt and LizardFS (as of now) it becomes a cloud completely >> without masters. Thus, any node is sufficient for the cloud to be up >> and therefore no wasted resources and no single point of failure. >> >> It's still p...

On Wed, 5 May 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > Take 'arch' for example: its approach seems like it would solve almost all > > of the version control issues that we are facing, and supports > > decentralized development in particular. From what I understand, you > > would be able to do all of your development on your own "local" branch, > > others could have access to it, and when it's ready, we could pull it in > > as one big patch or set of changes. > > Ther...

...ich makes them portable and flexible. Additionally, Ansible has a large community backing it with lots of plugins, so doing administration with Ansible should be easier. With this approach, you could even have a domain-joined machine run playbooks on other machines. I envision this to be a more decentralized approach to administration that takes advantage of the nature of Active Directory. For the design, the Ansible playbooks will be stored in the sysvol folder. On each host, Ansible will be set up by a daemon and then it will run the playbooks against the local host based on the objects in L...

...mailing list history) on current SVN (and so think you should too =D, maybe even on my un-applied patches ?). I've kept working a bit on IceCast, and am thinking of putting up a git tree somewhere soon (as soon as I can clean my current state). > We are using a cluster of icecast servers as decentralized > stream-servers for theartcollider.org project and rely on the > yellow-pages protocol to gather information about available > streams/servers. nice, btw, neewbie question, is there an OpenSource generic, prefered implementation of a yp server ? I googled a bit and didn't find an...

...lat > out sucks. This is because the svn model is fundamentally opposed to > the idea of private repositories. There's One True Repository and > that's it. David, You need to separate "what is good for David" from "what is good for the project". Encouraging decentralized development and long-lived branches is not actually in the best interest of the project. I agree that there are some (quite minor IMO, like offline commits) advantages that git can provide over SVN for the preferred llvm development workflow. However, there are also large costs to switch (bot...

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 00:41:35 -0800 ToddAndMargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 12/04/2016 03:37 AM, Bernard Chabot via samba wrote: > > I’m using a decentralized data storage application named > > StorjShare-CLI : https://github.com/Storj/storjshare-cli > > > > This application store data into « nodes ». StorjShare-CLI can run > > 1 or several « nodes » in order to store data located at different > > places. > > >...