search for: decalre

I have just some vague and thus probably wrong ideas about when to use model() in controllers, and by now I err on being redundant. I don''t post them here to avoid leaving anything that may be false in the archives. Can anyone explain exactly in which cases one should use model()? -- fxn

...pass I have some variable named "expr" which is being declared as :- string expr; // or char *expr; // Now I want to pass this "expr" to some external function. How can I do this?? Similarly, How can I pass variable "var" to an external function which is being decalred as :- Vector<int> var; Any help will be appreciated.............. -- View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/Passing-String-to-an-external-function-in-llvm-tp59798.html Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

This patch adds the MTRR MSRs save/restore support. Signed-off-by: Disheng Su <disheng.su@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...e clear now. The insn with incoming flag basically reuses the outflag of another insn. If I understand correctly, any intruction that can change status (usually a status register, or are there any other examples???) should/can produce an OutFlag. And any instruction that can need a flag, should be decalred with InFlag. What about instructions that use status, but do not change it (like conditional jumps) - should they also have an outFlag to indicate that they propagate a status? And what about such instructions like jumps or calls, where chains are used. What is the exact meaning of the chain? W...

...with a limited amount of user, I'm willing to take a performance hit. 3. Migrate my parents &c to use the new server. 4. When all users have been moved on to using the new server, upgrade MX records for the domain to point at the new server. 5. When all MX records are updated, decalre success. Is this feasible, and what would the risks be. For instance, during step 4, mails are bound to arrive at bothe the old and new server for some time. Will this cause problems? Is there a simpler solution to the problem? -- /Wegge Leder efter redundant peering af dk.*,linux.debian.*

Greetings, I inherited a samba based domain at my work with two domain controllers running Zentyal 3.4.8 with samba version 4.1.6-Zentyal. I don't know if it's modified by the Zentyal team but they don't support this version anymore, that's why I'm writing to this list. The previos sysadmin told me that replication stopped working a while back, but only in one direction. PDC

...hat is something that would need to be fixed then. > > I had a quick look on that PR(thanks for sharing). A verifier(if implemented) at LLVM level would invalidate this too. Would that be good ? > That brings up one other question, After SROA(like in present case) there can be mix of *dbg.decalre* and *dbg.value* of the same variable left out. > Snippet from PR > [.] > call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i64* %arr.sroa.0, metadata !15, metadata DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 64)), !dbg !23 > store i64 0, i64* %arr.sroa.0, align 16, !dbg !23 > call void @llvm.dbg.val...

> On Mar 30, 2020, at 11:57 PM, Sourabh Singh Tomar <sourav0311 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > My understanding is that this isn't correct: dbg.declare specifies the >> memory address of a variable for the whole lifetime of the function, >> whereas dbg.value (and dbg.addr) specify the value/address until the >> next debug intrinsic. Mixing these two kinds

...pass this "expr" to some external function. > How can I do this?? Have you tried compiling some code with Clang to see what IR it produces for different types, calls, and passing? > > Similarly, How can I pass variable "var" to an external function which is > being decalred as :- > Vector<int> var; > > Any help will be appreciated.............. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/Passing-String-to-an-external-function-in-llvm-tp59798.html > Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabbl...

Before digging into the whole stack of what composed an AD, I would try to replace this second DC (the one you called SDC). When joining a DC to a Samba AD domain,if this DC was already decalred as DC, Samba first demote that DC to then start a the whole process to join that DC to the domain. And that whole process includes re-creation of the AD database locally with full synchronisation. Not sure that solves your issue, but it could. In fact I would first test using a third (virtual) m...

We have severla samba servers which we've just tried to upgrade to using the domain based security. Most things seem to be fine but there is one problem which is causing some trouble. Roaming profiles are decalred on the PDC to be: logon path = \\ufs.%G\%U\Profiles which resolves to a folder called Profiles in the users home directory. The server ufs.%G is not the same server as the PDC. When we try to log in we get a message telling us that there is a security problem with the Roaming profile...

> Basically, flag operands are a hack used to handle resources that are not > accurately modeled in the scheduler (e.g. condition codes, explicit > register assignments, etc). The basic idea of the flag operand is that > they require the scheduler to keep the "flagged" nodes stuck together in > the output machine instructions. >From an user point of view, flags have

One of the things that turned me on to BDD and RSpec was speccing views first, that the desired end would drive the development. In previous projects while using Test::Unit I would try to make educated guesses as to what would be needed in the model and controllers to derive the view without actually writing the view until afterwards. This is all because testing relied on each previous

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > But your previous explanations were so good that I implemented in my > backend last week almost the same that you've done now in the > X86InstrSSE.td. I even introduced isCommutable parameter to indicate > this property, just as you did. So, by now integer arithmetic and > general purpose instructions are implemented. I'm working

I'm afraid I am at a loss. If the three files, app_cbmysql.c, app_meetme2.c and Makefile all exist in ../apps then a patch -p1 from the ../asterisk directory should work. The -p1 tells patch to ignore the first directory in the path to the file in the patch, -p2 ignores two directories. Another option is to just edit the apps-meetme-cbmysql.txt and split it into three patchs and apply