search for: dec04342

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dec04342".

2008 Jul 03
2
[LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
...Hello World esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c -o hello.bc esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ ls hello hello.bc hello.c esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ lli hello.bc Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4) esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-dis < hello.bc[ bash: hello.bc[: No such file or directory esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-dis < hello.bc llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4) Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM...
2008 Jul 03
0
[LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
> Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions of > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this. If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same rev number to be safe. For llvm-gcc 2.3, you should use llvm 2.3. You can't use llvm-gcc 2.3 with llvm svn TOT for example. What version of llvm and llvm-gcc
2008 Jul 03
2
[LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1 2008/7/3 Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org>: > > > Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions > of > > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this. > > If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same > rev number
2008 Jul 03
0
[LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
> I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1 And llvm-gcc is also from the 2.3 release? If so, I'm guessing you have an older version of llvm or llvm-gcc in your path somewhere and that is being used instead. Ciao, Duncan.