Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "dec04342".
2008 Jul 03
2
[LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
...Hello World
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-gcc -O3 -emit-llvm hello.c -c
-o hello.bc
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ ls
hello hello.bc hello.c
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ lli hello.bc
Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342
(Vers=0, Pos=4)
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-dis < hello.bc[
bash: hello.bc[: No such file or directory
esbox at embedded2i:~/llvm/projects/teste$ llvm-dis < hello.bc
llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM...
2008 Jul 03
0
[LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
> Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions of
> llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this.
If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same
rev number to be safe. For llvm-gcc 2.3, you should use llvm 2.3. You
can't use llvm-gcc 2.3 with llvm svn TOT for example.
What version of llvm and llvm-gcc
2008 Jul 03
2
[LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1
2008/7/3 Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org>:
>
> > Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions
> of
> > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this.
>
> If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same
> rev number
2008 Jul 03
0
[LLVMdev] Error loading program 'hello.bc': Invalid bytecode signature: DEC04342 (Vers=0, Pos=4)
> I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1
And llvm-gcc is also from the 2.3 release? If so, I'm guessing
you have an older version of llvm or llvm-gcc in your path somewhere
and that is being used instead.
Ciao,
Duncan.