Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "debughint".
Did you mean:
debugint
2006 Sep 28
1
[LLVMdev] Bug in WritingAnLLVMPass.html
I find a bug in document llvm/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#debughints
Since the PassManager class is in the namespace llvm, we should use command
(gdb) break llvm::PassManager::run
to set breakpoint. Otherwise we get error message:
(gdb) break PassManager::run
Can't find member of namespace, class, struct, or union named "PassManager::run"
Hint: tr...
2006 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Name of Function's original module during link-time optimization
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Bram Adams wrote:
>
> A limitation here is that only Functions' debug data can be kept, as
> other Values (i.e. Instructions) are not Annotable. Is this an explicit
> design decision?
Yes, we intentionally do not want things to be annotatable. In fact,
Function being annotatable is a wart due to the way the code generator
currently works. In general, we
2006 Sep 26
2
[LLVMdev] Name of Function's original module during link-time optimization
Hi,
Chris Lattner wrote:
> I'd suggest writing a little pass that strips out debug intrinsics.
>
OK, I did this and it works (the strange seg fault also disappears after
all declared debug variables are gone)! In a first phase, all intrinsic
instructions are discarded after extracting their data into annotations
attached to the relevant Function. Then, a second phase wipes out the