search for: debug_label

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "debug_label".

Did you mean: dbg_label
2019 Jan 30
2
[RFC] Generate Debug Information for Labels in Function
...t; I also see that there has been some talk about loop unrolling etc. when > discussing this RFC. Was there a consensus on what should happen if we > end up with multiple dbg.label intrinsics for the same label due to > code duplication? > > Here is an example where we get two "#DEBUG_LABEL: main:foo" but only one > DW_TAG_label for "foo": https://godbolt.org/z/oTpHQp > > Maybe that is as expected, or is it allowed to have multiple DW_TAG_label > for the same label name? > > /Björn > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev <...
2018 Mar 30
4
[RFC] Generate Debug Information for Labels in Function
> On Mar 30, 2018, at 9:25 AM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > >> On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:29 PM, Hsiangkai Wang <hsiangkai at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I agree with you. Attach debug metadata to basic block will be a >> better solution. I will change my design to convey debug metadata >> through basic block